0% chance of that happening. I don’t live in NY, and I’m willing to bet they’re gonna go extra tough on weeding out people even slightly knowledgeable about jury nullification.
That’s not the type of info that someone would necessarily volunteer unless they had no intnention of using it. The beautiful thing about it is that even if a person perjured themself about knowing of jury nullification, the one time they’d realisticly make use of it couldn’t actually be used as evidence/testimony against them.
-They may weed out the young and educated, though.
To all the people who say he’s just a suspect, unfortunately they have good evidence against him, our only hope now is a jury of our peers.
okay…
the second one with a comment could be any fedi commenter… people use word parasite here every other comment lol
Nah, doesn’t look like the picture.
that’s what I’m sayin; unrelated let’s get you on that jury
0% chance of that happening. I don’t live in NY, and I’m willing to bet they’re gonna go extra tough on weeding out people even slightly knowledgeable about jury nullification.
That’s not the type of info that someone would necessarily volunteer unless they had no intnention of using it. The beautiful thing about it is that even if a person perjured themself about knowing of jury nullification, the one time they’d realisticly make use of it couldn’t actually be used as evidence/testimony against them.
-They may weed out the young and educated, though.
Isn’t the picture not even confirmed to be the shooter? So comparing a sus picture to a suspect seems like it’s getting pretty far removed.
All the more reason to doubt they got the right guy.