• teft
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5021 hours ago

    The san in sandisk is a replacement for sun not for sans. They basically didn’t want to be confused with Sun Microsystems so they renamed themselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      that is true, it was originally ‘sundisk’. the ‘new’ name (from 1995), though, is a rather clever double play on words.

      sandisk -> sans disk (no disk)
      sandisk -> sand disk (made from sand)

  • smokebuddy [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3822 hours ago

    I realized when I bought a WD_Black SSD and the chips read SanDisk so I looked it up

    (Excuse the lil’ cat hair there, or don’t)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      718 hours ago

      (Excuse the lil’ cat hair there, or don’t)

      Resisting the urge to blow it away even though it’s a photo 😁

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2221 hours ago

    western digital bought sandisk ~ 8 years ago as a form of self-preservation. their core business of mechanical hard drives was already in decline and being replaced by something completely different.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    517 hours ago

    That’s interesting, but most SD cards are based on the old Intel 8051 microcontroller running in the background. While Bill Mensch is behind Western Digital and the 6502, which is the processor typically in the background of hard drives.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    1822 hours ago

    best to play both worlds until one overtakes the other. they both still have a place currently.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      722 hours ago

      I have a old pc. Built atleast 6 years ago maybe more. It has a 1080 FTW2 GPU in it and that still plays everything at 1080p and 120-144fps no problems at all. I only have a 1tb HDD and a 240gb sdd. The sdd has windows and then one or MAYBE two games im playing a lot on steam. Everything else is on a HDD. It’s kinda just getting to the point where it’s annoying and I want more sdd space. But I’ve made it this far. Whenever I upgrade in the next few years it’s gonna hurt. But I honestly don’t think I’ll go to 4k. Maybe 1440. 4k just doesn’t seem worth it and doesn’t look that much better if at all really. I think we peaked at 1080p and 24inch computer monitors. Sorry lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        420 hours ago

        Resolution matters a lot less than pixel density. 1080p above 24" looks like shit so if you’re happy with your monitor size, definitely no need to upgrade

  • KaRunChiy
    link
    fedilink
    121 hours ago

    They should’ve gone full with the pun and called it “Sans Disk”