• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1917 hours ago

    It obviously won’t get close to passing but it would be incredible for Democrats if it did. He has zero margin in the House, nothing major is passing into law except tax cuts. All his executive order policies are inflationary.

    So either he’s crashing the economy, taking the blame for continued inflation, or getting nothing of consequence done. And he’d be 83 and asking for four more years. He’d get crushed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      We’ve played this game twice now. Let’s not try a third game of fascism chicken

      That said Obama vs trump would be a funny campaign. “My fellow Americans, look at this absolute buffoon. You want proof I’m a natural born citizen? I’ve been stuck here with him too.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          36 hours ago

          That was one race, and during a pandemic that probably would have lost the race for any incumbent, whether it made logical sense or not.

          Frankly I kind of wish he won his second term if he had to get another term at all. His bruised ego over losing, fear of legal consequences, and time away to stew on this have made him a far more dangerous president than last time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          And while i think he’d struggle in that scenario I’ve gotten very wary of people (myself included) thinking “he can’t possibly win in this scenario” because that’s twice now been the prelude to defeat. Wheras in 2020 he was taken as a serious threat from the start

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      517 hours ago

      Of course he will wreck the rather healthy US economy and break the unemployment record again, which he currently holds from his 1st term.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1724 hours ago

    Seems more like someone sucking up to Trump rather than something they realistically believe they could get passed

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 hours ago

      And we were all overreacting about Roe v Wade. “Precedent”, “established law”, “checks and balances”. It could never happen, they said.

      • Franklin
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I really would like to see some of those checks and balances I’ve heard so much about. Must have gotten confused—it’s cheques for the rich, on our dime, to make their balance keeps going up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2418 hours ago

      That’s a really dangerous way of thinking. We can no longer normalize this stuff by going “it’ll never actually happen.” It CAN happen. Get your head out of the sand and stop minimizing the very real threat our democracy is facing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        What democracy? We’ve been living in a police state our entire lives. Talk about a dangerous way of thinking, ffs, how many hundreds of thousands of people were murdered under the Bush administration alone, and you act like that was just healthy democracy? Why were Bush and Obama on the same page about the erosion of our civil liberties and global imperialism? I swear, some of you are just miles from the correct explanation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        417 hours ago

        This one won’t happen though. It doesn’t have the votes. It would require a Constitutional amendment, and thus a LOT of Democrats on board.

        You can’t freak out about every possible thing.

        • Rob T Firefly
          link
          fedilink
          English
          217 hours ago

          When every possible thing is this fucking freaky, we can indeed freak out about them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      117 hours ago

      Reminder that they control all branches of government and can do whatever the hell they want.

      Even though I partially agree that it’s probably somebody sucking up instead of them passing a “remove all term limits” bill instead.

      Or maybe they’re just testing the waters and compliance of the people currently elected, heck if I know.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    To amend the United States Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the states. The process is outlined in Article V of the Constitution.

    Congress: A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required

    Constitutional convention: Two-thirds of state legislatures must call for a convention

    Ratification: Three-fourths of state legislatures or conventions must ratify the amendment

    Each state legislature must vote on the amendment in an up-or-down vote

    State legislatures cannot change the language of the amendment

    This is DOA

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 day ago

      Seriously. It’s obviously abhorrent, but thankfully as of now there’s zero chance of it passing. Save your energy for the many things that warrant shock and disgust.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    361 day ago

    From the article:

    Ogles’ resolution is tailored specifically to permit Trump to serve a third term, but not to allow three out of the four living former presidents to serve third terms.

    It’s a Trump only privilege which, given the track record, could have been assumed, unfortunately.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    651 day ago

    What a frivolous waste of congressional speaking time. I thought these guys had real problems to solve? I thought Trump was gonna fix it all this time around? You’re telling me not even 1 week into his new term and he’s already thinking about how the job won’t be done in time?

    Conservatives are pathetic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 hours ago

      On the other hand, better they do nothing than actuality successfully fucking everything up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        The worry is that perhaps Trump is smarter than he appears, and all he’s doing is showing his followers that he’s still all about setting up a autocratic government which they’ll get to be the muscle for, ready to do a violent takeover the moment elections stop working (just like last time, but this time better armed and better organised)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If this fails, you can expect them to redefine what a “term” means. And if that fails they can simply cancel elections under “emergency” conditions and keep him in office for longer.

      … and if that fails, they can just say “too bad” and do whatever they want anyway because who’s going to stop them?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 day ago

      I just want to point out that this is just one of the many many campaign promises he is trying to fulfill. Sure, it’s a big deal. But simply saying “conservatives are pathetic” is not only reactionary, it is wrong. Look at what is happening to immigrants. You might not see them as a problem, but conservatives do, and they are “solving” it.

      Just saying, this shit is way scarier this time around. They’re fuckin’ moving.

  • htrayl
    link
    fedilink
    301 day ago

    Trump is not exactly a spring chicken. He is one mild medical event to being in the history book.

    • TheLowestStone
      link
      fedilink
      118 hours ago

      Great, than we end up with Vance aka the young, healthy, couch-fucking, monarchist who lacks Trump’s compulsive need for worship.

      • VindictiveJudge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 hours ago

        Vance used to be the face of Never Trump, which makes his actual motives a mystery. The best possibility would rely on him pulling a long con, but so would the worst possibility.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    40
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    A constitutional amendment required 2/3s House and Senate AND 3/4 of states. And they don’t have that. This is more bullshit to distract.

    To amend the U.S. Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states). Alternatively, an amendment can be proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures, but this method has never been used.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      281 day ago

      This is more bullshit to distract.

      This is saying it louder for the people in the back. Musk’s Nazi Salute isn’t getting the message across? Okay, how about this?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        151 day ago

        They so desperatly want a hidden militia to come out of the woodwork and coup the country for them

        Those people are either dead from covid, too old to fight for their coup, or are just LARPers and actually aren’t interested in dying for a con man.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          I mean, kind of. People only follow laws because they believe that the laws will shield them when it is their turn. Otherwise it’s just ‘those with power do what they want.’

          When regular people stop believing in the law, you get Luigis.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      Ok. How many votes do they need to change the rule governing how many votes a constitutional amendment requires?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        217 hours ago

        That would also be an amendment to the Constitution.

        The last amendment that passed took over 200 years to get through the process.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        the same amount,

        The United States Constitution Article V:

        The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      192 days ago

      Fuck you, that wasn’t why Trump won. It was because Dems offer nothing but the avoidance of something worse.

      I’m outraged at the genocide and voted for Biden anyway. People can be mad at Dems and demand better without being responsible for their failure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        462 days ago

        The American people failed.

        This was fucking advertised. This was chosen. This was voted for.

        Stupidest populous on earth.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 day ago

          How is any of this “chosen” when everything is gerrymandered and rigged?

          Our biggest fault was being the frog who stayed in the water while it was heating up. We have just slowly been giving up freedoms with a little fuss but not enough to matter. We need to learn to say no firmly and with conviction.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Any obstacles to electing someone else could have easily been overcome.

            If “Did Not Vote” was a candidate:

            This was completely preventable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            91 day ago

            Gerrymandering doesn’t exist in your presidential election.

            The majority of Americans supports - or at the very least is neutral towards - Trump. You can blame this on a lot of factors such as misinformation and lack of education but this doesn’t change the general attitude.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                51 day ago

                The electoral college has bias towards states with lower populations but it’s not gerrymandering.

                Gerrymandering is specifically drawing district borders to guarantee victory with a minority of votes.

                The US presidential election would be gerrymandered if some states decided to go through mitosis to get more electoral votes for their party.

            • Drusas
              link
              fedilink
              11 day ago

              Something like 49% of eligible voters voted for Trump. And many eligible voters don’t vote. So no, factually, you are incorrect. A lot of people here are too poor to give a shit about politics and are completely unengaged.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 day ago

                Many eligble voters don’t vote

                People who don’t vote either cannot vote due to discrimination or don’t vote because they are neutral towards the winner:

                Overall, 10% of Americans are what we call Bystanders, or the politically disengaged, according to Pew Research Center’s Political Typology report. None of this cohort say they’re registered to vote, and none say they follow government and public affairs most of the time.

                https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2014/07/07/1-in-10-americans-dont-give-a-hoot-about-politics/

                If you don’t care about politics, you are not opposed to Trump.

          • Drusas
            link
            fedilink
            21 day ago

            Anyone downvoting you is an idiot. This is exactly the situation the American people have been in.

        • Drusas
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          I’m with you until the last sentence. Fewer than 50% of American voters voted for Trump.

      • JaggedRobotPubes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        The avoidance of all of this is probably the single most motivating thing in existence. Implying otherwise is strange.

        You don’t sleep in your actively burning home because none of the local hotels tickle your fancy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          218 hours ago

          Which is why I voted for the lady who refused to condemn genocide. What are you arguing?

          Dems are center right. They have been for a long time because of cold war propaganda and brainwashing. That doesn’t mean I won’t vote against fascism. It means we need better alternatives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 day ago

      Why are y’all still fighting about this? Your farce of an election is over, what purpose does this ceaseless bickering serve?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    872 days ago

    “It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

    so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 day ago

    'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms," the amendment states. Former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all served two consecutive terms, and thus would be barred from being elected to a third term. But not Trump, who is the first president since Grover Cleveland in 1892 to be elected to a second, non-consecutive term.