• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1424 hours ago

    Reminds me a lot of after 9/11 when they tried to change French Fries to Freedom fries. That stuck about as well as water on teflon.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 day ago

    I cannot believe they bent on this at all. This isn’t the will of the people or a problem we asked to solve it is the asinine rantings of a fucking baby. Why the fuck am I stuck in this timeline holy shit.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 day ago

    Google; we’re still calling it Twitter you think we’re gonna start calling it Gulf of America just because a doofus says so?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 day ago

    well google always displays the locally official names and borders. so just business as usual.

    but why does the president of the usa get to decide what places are called? isn’t there a cartography department or something?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 day ago

      Yes. The United States Board on Geographic Names is the group within the Department of the Interior which handles these matters. They are a part of the executive branch. I suspect that you can follow a chain of delegated authorities through that board, up the civil service hierarchy, landing on the desk of the President.

      This is an example of the system not accounting for, or being ambivalent about, the election of someone to that office with a fascist ideology.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        fair enough. i guess the usa never did a great job ar limiting their presidents power. that way he can extend his reach way further down, than he should…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 day ago

    Why would google, a company of such unfathomable power and reach, be fearful of Trump? They can say no and it won’t affect their bottomline much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 day ago

      Google, or rather Alphabet, is an American company. Trump is the president of America, the most powerful country militarily and economically. Alphabet is also subject to American laws and is currently under an anti-trust lawsuit with America. What makes you think Google can stand up against the US?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        The only thing they care about is money. If their bottomline doesn’t benefit, they don’t do.

        Unless the CEOs are worried they’ll have a Trump supporter shoot them dead and then be immediately pardoned and released by Trump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 days ago

      Given Colbert took the absurdity of conservatism in the US and cranked it up to 11… I’m not surprised it’s becoming reality now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 day ago

    “The Trump administration has passed a resolution saying that Mexico will now be called ‘America South’ and Canada ‘America North’. Google said it will follow the government’s lead in changing the names on it’s maps app.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    For what it’s worth, this is how Google maps has always worked. Use Google maps in China and you’ll notice that borders are in different places, HK, Tibet Bhutan, the whole China sea, those are within China’s borders. It’s the same with Russia, crimea is just part of Russia if you use Google maps in Russia. If your country recognizes different borders or different names for places, that’s what Google shows you in your country. It’s basically either that or they can’t operate in that country, so they don’t really have a choice if they want to exist in that region.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Well yeah, as of 6 years ago, after China invaded with military force, HK has been recognized as part of China on all maps. But Google showed it as part of China even before then.

        And then yeah, I just remembered the wrong name, it was the border of Tibet/Bhutan that are in dispute, so parts of Bhutan display as Chinese territory.

        Thanks for catching that.

        • مهما طال الليل
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          HK was handed back to PRC in 1997, there was a ceremony and everything. Just because it was stolen by the British for sometime doesn’t mean it isn’t Chinese. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handover_of_Hong_Kong

          A border dispute between Bhutan and China isn’t something exceptional, Wikipedia has a list of border disputes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes your country might have some of its own

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 day ago

            I never said it was exceptional, quite the opposite, I’m saying many countries have border disputes.

            Interesting that you don’t seem to care about my other examples, Gaza or Crimea. Got a soft spot for China?

            • مهما طال الليل
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              What a weird response. I was addressing your comment. You didn’t mention Palestine -all of it is Palestine FYI, Israel is just another Crusader state- and Crimea should be returned to the Crimean Tatars, both Slavic peoples are invaders.

              But no, you would rather play the Sinophobia and Yellow Perilism card and assume that I receive Xi bucks. What a day! I didn’t mention my own country’s border disputes with its neighbors either! Didn’t see it necessary to educate you on the matter.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 day ago

                What a weird response. I was addressing your comment. You didn’t mention Palestine.

                Oh whoops, it must have been a different post in this thread that I mentioned Gaza.

                you would rather play the Sinophobia and Yellow Perilism card and assume that I receive Xi bucks.

                I’ve said nothing of the sort. That sounds like deflection.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s little point in doing so, other than the feel-good moment. Google, and all other mapping companies, ultimately take their data from official sources. This differs per country, so users of maps from outside of the US will continue to see Gulf of Mexico, but complaining that it is wrong will only be ignored because they’re following the data from the official US government source.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 days ago

      They never fix bugs in maps. Some places IRL even got renamed, because it was easier than fixing the name in google maps.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Yeah, I’ve been meaning to switch to OpenStreetMaps for a while now and this was the impetus to drop what I was doing and download it immediately. Fuck Google. So sick of this mask off tech plutocracy bullshit.

    Edit: I’ve tried it a few times yesterday and today, and I like it. Works with Android Auto in my car, guidance voice isn’t annoying, directions are accurate. Only complaint is I’m not sure how to search up a business and have the app map me to the nearest location. I need to dig deeper and figure out if I just haven’t found it yet.

    I would 100% drop GMaps if I could hit the directions button on a Google search and have it bring up OSM instead. Google Maps has been bugged for me for years and the maps app never gets the address from a browser search. I have to search for the business or address in the maps app itself for it to work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 days ago

        The discussion seems to be focused around possibly waiting for one or more governing bodies to rule on the name change, or just going along with it and adding an alternate text for people who would prefer the old one, which I think is way more democratic than anything Trump had in mind when signing this XO.

        I certainly prefer this over the blind deference that Google seems to have for an executive order that is functionally just direction to the state department and not legally binding in any way whatsoever.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Well the openstreetmap community aren’t employed by a bunch of hacks perching on a tower of cardboard held together by a failing scheme of duck tape that nobody left after all the layoffs and enshittification knows how to repair, so that makes sense : )

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 days ago

    It’s giving big “freedom fries” energy. Makes sense when you think about how much of a wet dream the post-9/11 circle jerk was (is) for conservatives. They’re trying to recreate the same 2002 Republican, plastic-patriot distraction machine again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    532 days ago

    Can’t imagine wanting to work for big tech these days lol. These companies had insane reputation in the 2010s. People thought working for Google was like working in willy wonka’s chocolate factory. They really squandered their brand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 days ago

      Sadly though this was never going to be avoided, sure they’re leaning hard into conservative cult nonsense, but they were still on a downword optics trajectory. Its impossible not to have this happen in capitalism, it will always be inevitable that enshitifcation happens to milk profit from anywhere it can, and that will always look bad.

    • Cas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      Wildly, people still think that about working at Apple, for now. I do see that changing slowly too though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1052 days ago

    This is super dumb.

    How are these morons so offended about the name of a body of water?

    Their fragile ego is so completely shattered because Mexico “has a Gulf” and they “don’t”? Little men with too much power.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      English
      472 days ago

      California should just change Gulf of California to Gulf of Mexico

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 days ago

      Ultimate pettiness, show of power, or misdirection from other, more concerning news.
      Could be all at of those or something entirely different, but it sure is pathetic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      It’s misdirection and makes any laws or regulations specifically mentioning the Gulf of Mexico no longer apply since “tHeRe iSnT a gULf oF mExIcO.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    442 days ago

    What the hell. No one’s going to call it the Gulf of America, except for the magas, the rapist and his useless offspring.

    This is 4 years of drivel and it’ll always be knows as the Gulf of Mexico.

    The man in charge is the biggest moron to ever be given power to lead.

    Electing a rapist seems like a very American thing to do, who also married an immigrant, which is very odd since he’s doing his best to stop immigration.

    Something something racist rapist hypocrite.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 days ago

      Only hot and or under aged immigrants are acceptable. Specially if they have big natural boobs because that means new Americans with big natural boobs. I think penis-wise probably they might consider 8" and longer but must be very girthy. What do I know, I’m not a rapist politician. I could be totally wrong.