• @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      581 year ago

      To be fair, I’m not aware of any fediverse instances or other reddit alternatives that even have an appeals process. Reddit might be throwing away its best features, but it is a feature its competitors don’t even have yet.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          241 year ago

          And get re-banned if you post on the first instance from the remote. You can still be kicked out of communities because of misunderstandings and power tripping admins.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            251 year ago

            Every online community I’ve ever seen has it’s fieflords.

            At least with lemmy, if mods / admins regularly over-step, alternative communities can easily replace them.

            • deweydecibel
              link
              fedilink
              English
              191 year ago

              That was possible on Reddit too. Every single sub with overbearing mods could have been replaced at any time with an alternative. A bunch of alternatives tried to get off the ground, some succeeded more than others, but most never overcame the original, if they ever picked up at all.

              It’ll be the same way here. If the community doesn’t leave the original home because they’re “settled there”, alternatives will not grow.

              This entire migration from Reddit should make it it very, very plain how utterly impossible it is to get large groups of users to move. Reddit is all but whipping them with jumper cables right now and they’re still using it.

              You can’t just expect communities to move because the admins suck. You have to actually attract them there.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That was possible on Reddit too

                Not really. Reddit is a single platform, you get the same overbearing comment-editing admins, with the same tunnel-vision automod tools and black-hole recurse process no matter what new sub you make.

                Moving people off a platform is the hardest part, they need to learn new tools an ways of doing things… and TL;DR you lost them.

                On lemmy and the fediverse, leaving unwelcoming mods/admins behind is as easy as going to another instance, no need to change the ways of using it. Still need to attract that community, but it’s orders of magnitude easier on a federated platform.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Yeah, I haven’t used Lemmy in a month because this site is more transphobic than Reddit. I’ll be here more now that Reddit isn’t an option, but it’s not like I think this place is good either. Lemmy needs to step up its game.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I haven’t used Lemmy in a month because this site is more transphobic than Reddit.

                  Well that’s very disappointing if true. Could you give an example?

                  Btw, just to be clear-- Lemmy isn’t “one site,” so you’re likely to get a wide range of reactions depending on issue/cause where you happen to be (communities, instances).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Why would you go back to a community you don’t agree with? There is a reason there are like 20+ “cats” communities on so many different instances; you can pick a different one, or start one yourself (and be the mod you want), or even a whole instance (and be the admin you want).

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              Sometimes some of the users are nice and you want to hang with them. Sometimes it’s just a misunderstanding. Sometimes you have a political motivation and are motivated not by self-interest to hang with cool people, but by a moral duty to make the world a better place

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                Create a community and invite over the nice users? If it’s just a misunderstanding, try talking it out with the mods? If you have a political motivation… sorry, can’t help you there, most online forums are not the place to run a campaign that doesn’t align with the nod’s views, there is no free speech protection on non-government property.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Yeah, but that doesn’t matter when the rules of dbzer0 prohibit prosocial behaviour. It’s against the instance rules to insult someone for being a nazi.

              • Draconic NEO
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Hang on, you think dbzer0 is Ableist, I really don’t see how since he basically just explained that the rules aren’t black and white and that it’s a case by case basis. Nor how the users or dbzer0 itself is fascist by your opinion. I like to give people a chance but you must understand this seems very baity and kind of like trolling.

                Yeah I’m 100% certain you are a troll who provides very little value to this platform.

                • Unruffled [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  Lol this is the person who was trying to argue the other day that narcissism was a disability that should provoke sympathy, rather than a negative trait that should be called out and worked on. So according to that logic, we should we feel sorry Donald Trump because of his narcissism now and not despise him, to use a topical example. I guess it’s subjective but I’d call that sort of argument a form of gaslighting. Like they’re saying, it’s not the narcissists who are the problem, it’s the people who don’t understand the narcissists who are the problem. Keep yelling into the wind buddy.

      • BolexForSoup
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly, I don’t think a message board has to have one. If a mod is powertripping, then why would you want to be a part of the community? If they’re not, then you’re probably not a good fit for the community and the mod doesn’t have to deal with trolls and angry back-and-forth’s.

        That isn’t to say what Reddit did isn’t wrong. They established that system and they have a culture of appeals. Suddenly removing that isn’t really fair from a “social contract” or whatever perspective.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Honestly, I don’t think a message board has to have one. If a mod is powertripping, then why would you want to be a part of the community?

          Example: To make sure nonsensical posts, for example from tankies, get countered.

          If they’re not, then you’re probably not a good fit for the community

          Same example: I an not supposed to disrupt their little get-together-with-bullshit.

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            To make sure nonsensical posts, for example from tankies, get countered.

            Why are any of us entitled to that though? If they don’t want us around then they can show us the door. To use (at least to me) a better example: why should LGBT communities have to allow people to debate them on whether or not it’s a choice? If they don’t want to, they shouldn’t have to. They may just want a corner to be together and chat.

            We aren’t entitled to a debate if people don’t want to participate you know?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              For one thing this is why echo chambers are dangerous. They have real world implications. For another though, there’s a difference between a debate and downright trolling or inciting behavior regardless of topic. Conflating the two is kind of disingenuous.

              And if you don’t want to debate you don’t put that information on a public forum because debate is literally a baked in feature of public forums. That part of the reason they exist. You’re putting something out into public. It doesn’t just belong to you anymore/doesn’t just affect you anymore. That’s literally the basis for a lot of civil rights laws and why you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater.

              You can’t just say a stereotype or something racist in public. What should in theory be happening is people of the LGBTQ should have the same protections under the law (anti-discrimination) as other protected groups get.

              If the community is founded on that as a rule (no discrimination) and the comment is in violation that’s one thing. Ban people. Do what you need to to follow the rules, enforce the rule, and protect the community. But at the same time discourse in a community isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

              Do you not want nonsensical posts on your LGBTQ communities about “gay frog water” or whatever to face discourse? Do you not want people in the community to counter anyone bold enough to claim that as fact?

              • BolexForSoup
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Conflating the two is kind of disingenuous.

                I’m not conflating so much as saying the line between them can be incredibly thin and hard to find. Additionally, some people are ignorant/hard headed/saying horrible things but they’re also completely unaware of the issue so where do you say “that’s enough”? Some people also hide behind rules and weaponize speech so they can use it as cudgel to cause issues in a community. It is exhausting dealing with these people sometimes and some communities just don’t want to, which I think is their prerogative!

                I get why my stance is getting pushback. I just think ultimately it’s up to a community how much they want to deal with friction. Some people don’t. That’s fine!

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Communities can be built to be insular and require things of their members that would allow for what you seem to want but that involves a time investment to vet users and essentially make the community read only for people who aren’t members. That comes with a whole host of other problems but it is doable.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              Protest is a fundamental part of a functioning government, a functioning society, and a functioning community. I’ve been a mod on queer forums, and I always gave people a way to argue their case so long as they were engaging in respectful debate. I would tell people the boundaries and make sure they followed them. For example, if someone wants to say I’m not really nonbinary, I’ll argue the point with them because it’s my duty as a community leader, but I will establish they must gender me correctly and not use slurs for the duration of the debate, even if they disagree. They’re welcome to make their disagreement while respecting me, and usually they couldn’t manage that balance and I banned them. They would run out of patience before I did. It is absolutely essential that community moderators have an abundance of patience.

              • BolexForSoup
                link
                fedilink
                51 year ago

                But not everyone wants to mod that community and not every community wants that debate to be happening. I am very grateful for your work and I have run communities that encourage discussion as well, but it’s not really a moral imperative or legal requirement or anything. Every community has its own culture, tone, rules, expectations, etc.

                Again, I think it’s great that you run a community that operates like that and I think those discussions are very important and good for our society. Thank you for doing it, truly. But not every single Internet community has to allow extensive debate.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  You and I have very different ideas about the moral responsibilities of people in authority. I think it’s essential that leaders be held to a higher standard in all cases.

        • TWeaK
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t have to have a fair appeals policy, but an instance that has an appeals policy is one that you would probably want to join more. So an instance should have a fair appeals policy, because that’s what the users who use the instance want - assuming the instance wants users.

          As for what reddit did, there’s a lot of pulling the rug out that you’re casually ignoring. Reddit is what it is because of the users that contributed to it. In spite of Huffman talking about “their dataset”, they don’t actually own the data - it belongs to the users, reddit merely has a license.

          Now, reddit is trying to change the rules - as a user, you’re no longer in charge of the subreddit you created and became moderator of anymore, you’re expected to serve “will of the users” (as defined by reddit admin), the users you attracted to the house you built. Reddit was founded on the idea “if you don’t like it, make your own space, and users will flock towards the better one”.

          Reddit changed the moderator code of conduct. And yet, if you strictly apply the moderator code of conduct as they sometimes do, it completely undermines many of the bans that reddit admin also enforce. They’re hypocrits, now all they want is to exploit everyone that put them where they are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If a mod is powertripping, then why would you want to be a part of the community?

          Because the size of a community matters, and they’re not fungible. Back on reddit, my city’s subreddit was run by power-tripping mods. Sure, I could try to create an alternative – and somebody actually did – but it had multiple orders of magnitudes fewer users than the original sub and almost nobody would actually see what you posted there, so what’s the fucking point?

          The entire reason I wanted to comment in the original sub was to try to politically persuade and influence people in my city. Censoring me from that sub was extremely effective even if alternatives theoretically existed.

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            But your city has other communities on other platforms and local social meetups. You don’t have to use Reddit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              Well, I don’t use Reddit anymore – it has joined the list of oligarch-owned shit that I’m boycotting (along with Facebook and Twitter). And yes, I do participate in local politics IRL.

              But that still doesn’t invalidate what I wrote. The fact is that these platforms have too much fucking power as de-facto replacements for the public forum, and whether you refuse to use them or you get kicked out from them, it marginalizes you in a very real way that affects the real world. That’s a problem even if the possibility exists to go commune with other rejects on a platform the majority don’t give a shit about.

              Not to mention, if I had a nickel for every real-world event hosted by a real-world local government, community, or activist organization that I missed because it was only advertised on Facebook, I’d have a big pile of nickels.

              • BolexForSoup
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Oh I completely agree these platforms have too much power. Zero argument here. I’m just saying on an individual basis you have other options. But yeah i get what you’re saying

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I got a temp ban for ‘trolling’ here on .world a few weeks back. Literally no notice at all. Had to go to the discord and ask. They instantly reversed it because they could tell I hadn’t been trolling.

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Ehh . . sort of?

        Appealing a ban for a social media post is . . . I dunno. Weird.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Well in this case, my best guess is I’ve been banned because I contacted a mod team that doesn’t want to hear from me. Problem is, they’re leaking sensitive chats from back when I was a mod and using them to attack me on other platforms. I asked them to stop. I’m a victim of harassment, but they probably reported me and the Reddit employees don’t care enough about doing their jobs to investigate. I’ve been in situations like this before, and I was able to resolve it through the appeals process. But that’s not going to happen if they don’t tell me precisely why I’ve been banned or let me appeal it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            they’re leaking sensitive chats from back when I was a mod and using them to attack me on other platforms. I asked them to stop. I’m a victim of harassment, but they probably reported me and the Reddit employees don’t care

            A surefire way to make a company care, is to sue them. Just saying.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              I already contacted the police about the situation and they said it’s not illegal. And I’m way too poor to sue a billion dollar company.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                IANAL, but if they’re using private conversation contents without your permission to harass you… that sounds illegal to me.

                And you don’t need to be rich to sue anyone. To win the case, maybe, but not just to sue.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  The law doesn’t exist to protect people, it exists to protect capital. If you’re expecting to law to help trans people deal with abuse, you’re looking up the wrong tree.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Most instances have some way of contacting the admins and talking things out. Unlike Reddit’s “did anyone even read this?” process, they tend to be actual people who actually answer.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          No, they don’t. You can’t contact the admins from an account you can’t log into, and you can’t log into a suspended account. Also, your PMs won’t be seen by any user native to a remote instance you’ve been banned from, including admins.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            First, there is email, discord, element, etc. Check your instance for contact options, they usually have some. Second, you can use an alt account from anywhere in the fediverse to PM people. If you’re honest about it, you can find a way.

            Or… if you know you broke the rules and plan on doing it again, just move onto some other instance more accepting of your profile, there are 1000+ ones to choose from.

  • Polar
    link
    fedilink
    1391 year ago

    I got banned for telling someone it’s important to check for cancer, on a post about a sports person that died from rectal cancer, and I was banned permanently for “harassment”.

    I appealed and lost.

      • Uranium3006
        link
        fedilink
        281 year ago

        The distinction between mod subreddit bans and site wide bans is basically gone

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Yeah I got banned from greenandpleasent the same time Russia invaded Ukraine because it was taken over by a bunch of boot lickers and likely actual paid russian shills, probably some of the same crowd hosting hexbear et al. And got a site wide ban soon after…

      • Polar
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Oh I got banned from the site. Reddit admins banned me lmao.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        yep, and yet somehow reddit never does anything about the report abuse for the ‘self help’ thing which id get dozens of PM’s a day about at one point, reported them and nothing was ever done about it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Years of being on reddit has conditioned me to always respond to this picture with

            So brave

            I literally cannot stop myself from posting it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          151 year ago

          Its an epithet for authcoms (authoritarian communists) and MLs (Marxists-Leninists). Essentially referring to justifications of using tanks / violence to quash uprisings or dissent.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Oh yeah, those are absolutely great sources and not made by people who have absolutely no understanding of historical terms. They definitely seem to be well educated on it /s

              • 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [she/they]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                It doesn’t make much sense. Stalin practiced Marxism-Leninism and didn’t consider himself to be inventing any new ideology.

                It’s about as ridiculous as “Bidenomics” — just what exactly is Biden actually doing differently?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          It’s a useless term that Trots and anarchists use to scream at people that disagree with them like babies (to be fair to the anarchists, they aren’t that far off by age)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s two definitions, the former means redfash who overlook the fascist elements of former socialisms, particularly those of Marxist-Leninist orientation. (the fact they use tankie rather than redfash should tell you they’re not entirely comfortable using fascist as a pejorative, want to guess why?)

          The latter is basically a dog whistle used by reactionaries to mean communist. Basically a synonym of “woke” for those not overtly racist and applies to anyone with left-of-hitler politics. Think your blue maga types who swear they’re progressive.

          Regardless, the word was invented by the CIA to sew division among the left and should not be used by anyone.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        If you approach things from a scientific perspective, the meaning of harassment is just “political speech I don’t like”. Some kinds of political speech, like protests and appeals, are important and should be allowed, but can easily be labelled harassment. Other kinds of political speech, like sexual harassment or hate speech, are bad. “Harassment” as a word isn’t a useful one. Two people having a fight are harassing each other, regardless of who’s right. We have created a society that hates political speech and welcomes the use of state and corporation violence to suppress dissenting politics.

        I don’t say this from a place of callousness. I’ve been a victim of the most vicious harassment and it’s given me PTSD. And what I learned from the experience is, talented manipulators and people with social power will always benefit from being able to call political speech harassment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          harassment is just “political speech I don’t like”

          Some communities on Lemmy have switched to calling it “misinformation”. As in: you provide links to reputable sources to support your point, and it’s “misinformation”.

          Harassment seems to be more of a label for “too many people downvoted you, and you still dared to answer”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            That explains why a troll tried ban baiting me for “disinformation” when I said something they didn’t like.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Yeah, that’s better. Misinformation covers situations like defamation and many kinds of hate speech. Although there still needs to be a solution for stalking and sexual harassment, as long as it doesn’t overlap and outlaw protest or deplatforming.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Misinformation covers situations like defamation and many kinds of hate speech.

              Not really:

              • Misinformation: “false information that is spread, regardless of whether there is intent to mislead.”
              • Disinformation: “deliberately misleading or biased information; manipulated narrative or facts; propaganda.”

              The difference is between “I don’t believe you, so you get banned” vs. “I think you’re trying to mislead people, so you get banned”.

              Misinformation allows banning any information a mod believes to be “false”, for whatever reason, no matter the proof.

              (PS: if any mod doesn’t agree with these definitions, they could remove this comment based on “misinformation”)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      God that’s actually worse than my banning (I posted a Google Streetview link of a layby). Incredible. Has anyone ever appealed and won? Ever?

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Yes, I did. But only because multiple subreddit mods, including all of the mods in the subreddit that triggered the ban, got behind me due to the bullshit nature of the ban.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I won my appeal once. I was banned for “hate speech”. I was literally being 100% sarcastic against someone who was truly being a hateful shithead. I assume I was banned by an idiot who doesn’t understand sarcasm exists, but unbanned by someone who has talked to another human before.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Person: “nien! slur slur

          You: “don’t be a cracker”

          Reddit: “Your comment has violated hate speech rules”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    76
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sorry, I don’t know where or how I broke the rules, can you show and explain it to me?

    No

    But then how will I avoid breaking rules in the future?

    Yes

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    691 year ago

    Nothing new, actually. When I was banned years ago (suspiciously after calling out some astroturfing), they didn’t give a reason either.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      591 year ago

      I pointed out that the Australian subreddits were being very obviously astro-turfed. And then I made a post naming the Aus PR companies that were openly running bot campaigns on Reddit and who was using them.

      That account got banned in record fucking time lol. And no reason was given either, it was a site-wide IP ban. Luckily one call to my ISP and that was sorted lol.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        291 year ago

        They welcome the evasion since they don’t actually want their number of ad impressions going down. They were just letting you know that under no circumstances were you to show anyone what’s behind the curtain.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Mind if I ask how long ago you were banned? It seems like over the last 6-9 months nationalist subreddits have ended up with a huge amount of sway in gettting people banned for arguing with them.

        IP ban isn’t the only way they can get you though. I’ve had them catch me out even with a fresh IP. They fingerprint browsers, using their own implementation of backend Google captcha (you don’t connect to gstatic.com, but redditstatic.com).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I think they use the email too. I once made a second with the same email and it was fine for a few minutes and then banned. I hadn’t voted or commented on anything yet.

          Then I made another with a brand new email on a different service and it too was banned pretty quick before I engaged with anything. That one I think was fingerprinted because my home IP changes every couple months naturally, so I wasn’t on the same IP that would have been banned. Also sometime around then I started using a VPN and it was still banned, so I’m thinking it was a fingerprint.

          At that point I was kinda over it but I was curious about the system. So I tried once more with another new service email, on a different IP from being on a mobile away from home. That one worked. It probably still works, but I don’t remember it or the password or the email I made for it. So it’s out there somewhere, but I don’t care any more because this all finished up around the time reddit killed third party apps, so I found this and my app came over, so I just entered the fediverse.

          I still have my NSFW account there which does still have all of my niche interests in far greater supply than I’ve found here so far. I’ve got my NSFW account here, but all the communities die pretty quick, so it’s not much use yet.

          • TWeaK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Somewhat, yes. I had a bunch of alts that used similar emails, they all got axed, but one was spared, perhaps because I never clicked to confirm the email. Then I suspect they linked any remaining or new accounts with different emails via a recent desktop browser.

            It was kind of cool looking into when everything was banned. Accounts I hadn’t logged into for years had been banned, all together - but not immediately with the first main ban.

            I think IP alone isn’t enough for them to decide to ban, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      sounds about right. I got perma banned for “harassment” for essentially saying spez is a piece of shit lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -441 year ago

        I got perma banned because I’ve gotten 4 or 5 accounts banned over the years for being toxic and harassing people. I made a joking “call to violence” and they hit me with a perma.

        Meh. I deserved it for sure. If they let me back on the platform I’d do it again 😈

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -71 year ago

            Thanks! Yeah there are some other websites where people share their reddit troll victims and funny comment threads where people are losing their minds. It’s a fun little game to see how many people you can get.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You got me there. It really does sound like you’re living life to the fullest of your potential.

        • JokeDeity
          link
          fedilink
          -81 year ago

          It’s so weird how people want to downvote you for trolling shitty Reddit. If you love it so much, go back?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            I can’t go back :( they fingerprinted my computer, phone, email, all of it. Allegedly I can go to a library and make a new account with a burner email but I haven’t tried.

            • Draconic NEO
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              They can’t fingerprint your computer, that’s a lie that Moderators tell to non-techsavy users to discourage ban evasion, just use the browsing history data you and the browser voluntarily give them, use Reddit through Tor and it won’t be effective, you can harass their admins constantly and they can’t do a thing about it, just keep banning the accounts (unless they want to Ban Tor which I don’t forsee happening at least for a while).

              Just don’t try pushing your luck because if you say anything too evil (i.e. threats of mass violence, mass destruction, violence or harm against the government, etc.) Dpeartment of Investigation, FBI, or Secret Service could still come after you with Tor.

  • Nukken
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    Yea this recently happened to me. A had an argument with a mod and he reported a non offensive comment I had on his subreddit as a ban evasion. I got suspended for ban evasion despite not having another account. After my suspension ended he reported the exact same comment again giving me a second suspension. After the 3rd time I got banned entirely. 10+ year account with no prior suspensions/bans just gone because of one mod. Between that and RIF being gone, I’m just done with reddit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 year ago

      Also ran afoul with a mod. Merari01 specifically. I reported one of his comments, and he sent it up as abuse of the report button. Insta perma banned. My account was registered in 2010.

      Reddit’s been awful for a while though so the loss wasn’t too bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        The only good thing that came out of the API protest was watching AwkwardTheTurtle and iBleeedOrange get stabbed in the back and purged from the site by Spez.

      • Ataraxia
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I dunno, I have like 15 accounts. One gets banned I move to the next lol!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I’m IP banned. doesn’t matter if it’s a new email, or device. I’ve tried many times and my accounts always get banned within 48 hrs. I haven’t tried getting a new modem yet, cause I don’t care that much about reddit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    541 year ago

    It’s almost like total control over content and no recourse is the goal! Garbage company, move on from it…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      391 year ago

      They are over here too! A mod on world news on lemmy.ml was saying that Ukraine probably bombed their own people yesterday. Then when evidence came out that it was Russia he deleted his comment and everyone’s involvement with the conversation calling him out

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    Stop! You’ve broken the law!

    Chances are you engaged in one of the following:

    Arguing an objectively correct viewpoint with a moron.

    Engaged in political sarcasm.

    Made use of hyperbole, facetiousness, or facetious hyperbole.

    Made a mod look stupid on their alt. account.

    Hurt a fascists feelings.

    Engaged in dark humour. (It’s like food, not everybody gets it.)

    Engaged in anti-reddit activism.

    Or just cause.

    If you’re feeling vindictive you can still request your data under GDPR every 30 days even on banned accounts and they have to comply by law.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Make sure you leave a bad review on the play/app store too, there’s so many negative reviews ‘absolute trash’ appears as a review topic

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    381 year ago

    My guy, at this point you’re only abusing yourself. Time to look at the writing on the wall, that site died months ago (or years ago in my opinion), you will only suffer using it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        It’s crazy to think or maybe my memory is misremembering history a little bit(?), but for Reddit users in general it was like “it’s sad to leave this platform after +10 years” but with Digg it was mostly “yeah…fuck this place went to hell, I’m out!”

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    Isn’t it trivial anyway, since you can still create unlimited anonymous accounts via old.reddit? I guess getting banned may actually matter for the subs that have a karma minimum to post, but…

    …You could also just not use reddit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Isn’t it trivial anyway, since you can still create unlimited anonymous accounts via old.reddit?

      wait, you can do that? does it check IP?

      • deweydecibel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Yes but IP is less useful nowadays as a way to identify users. VPNs are commonplace now, everyone has at least two or three IPs (their home, their mobile, their work/school), more than one person can be using the platform in the same place, etc.

        Not to say they don’t pay attention to that but it’s not enough on it’s own.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          sweet. well ill give it a shot for education and see how long it lasts. when i was permabanned my old alts also got banned within a few days (even though i hadnt used them in months)

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      It’s never been something I’ve done, and I can’t say I really care, but that would make it difficult to comment in subreddits with a karma threshold.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Well there’s subreddits created specifically for garnering enough karma to post around Reddit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Sure, you can close your eyes and live in a make believe world. But Reddit clearly still has a ton of activity.

        • eighthourlunch
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          And that activity will MySpace itself just as fast. It seems to me that’s their goal. All that investment money hates free speech.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            I can not see any decrease in activity, but I am only active in one sub, so I don’t know. From all I hear… they are fine for now.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              If you go to the modcoord subreddit, that is not the case everywhere. There have been several posts from mods complaining that their numbers are down, and they’re spending all their time modding to combat bot accounts. Reddit recently implemented a social credit score as well that not even mods can access. And they were vague as hell about what would make your score high/low.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Reddit’s u/spez liked what Musk was doing with Twitter 𝕏… just look at how that’s going, to know where Reddit is heading.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No question, but I see a ton of activity on Reddit. A few 10’000 moving to Lemmy is not going to matter for now.

                Also: just call it Twitter.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Lemmy is possibly over 300K now, with the whole fediverse over 12 million, but maybe only 4 million active. Reddit claims 1.7 billion active users, while some sources claim they only have 300M.

                  It’s really BS counts anyways, they don’t count interactions, or quality of interactions. From my time on Reddit, the quality had been going steadily down, then took a nosedive around 2021.

                  And even on TV they call it “X, formerly Twitter”, so that’s going to be it. They should register the x-formerly-twitter.com domain 😈

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There actually were no bots on Reddit when it first went online (were bots a thing in 05?). But Alexis and Steve both admitted to having multiple accounts to post links for those first few weeks to make it seem like there were more users than there actually were. Remember back when it first went online all you could do was post news articles. No comments, gifs, pics, or subreddits. It wasn’t until someone created Imgur for the express purpose of being able to post pictures on Reddit that you were able to do so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    This just so bad on so many levels.

    Reddit, people, need to explain why; is it a insta ban ? If you’re not explaining the reason nor linking the post in question; you’re offering zero path back

    One more reason to delete Reddit

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      They are doing this to reduce the reliance on mods. Tbf appeals almost never worked, but not linking content is explicitly to obscure accountability. It becomes harder to show that reddit moderation is garbage, even more so since the shortage, and much easier to automate.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        They used to link to the content… then you followed the link, and all it said was “Removed by Reddit”. Guess they’re saving you a step there 🤷

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They linked to comments and the sub too. Change the url from reddit.com/whatever to reveddit.com/whatever and you can see most of deleted comments.

          And even with a link you can see which comment it was in context and argue reddit was wrong/made the wrong decision/trying to burry something. They can also just ban people from discussions and claim it was “something they did in the past” but not say what.

          Reddit is not doing this to save you a click.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            reveddit.com/whatever and you can see most of deleted comments.

            Deleted, not edited comments. The linked comment would be edited to say “Removed by Reddit”, which reveddit wouldn’t see as a deleted comment, and it didn’t keep an edit history so there was no way to see what the comment said before (I know, I tried).

            You could see it in context, but if you thought you didn’t break any rules, that wouldn’t help much, and no way to argue it.

            Anyway, my best ban was for “violent content” from a sub with no link. Decided to blank the last month of comments… and got suspended site wide for repeated “violent content” offense. Blanked 10 years of comments… and that bought me 2 more years before getting suspended again, and perma banned when I appealed the suspension.

            Cherry on the top: a couple months after being perma-banned site-wide, last week I got banned from a sub. Reason: link to a blanked comment, “breaking the sub rules”. OK 🥱