Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    Ā·
    20 hours ago

    Somebody found a relevant reddit post:

    Dr. Casey Fiesler ‪@cfiesler.bsky.social‬ (who has clippy earrings in a video!) writes: " This is fascinating: reddit link

    Someone ā€œworked on a book with ChatGPTā€ for weeks and then sought help on Reddit when they couldn’t download the file. Redditors helped them realized ChatGPT had just been roleplaying/lying and there was no file/book…"

    • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      Ā·
      14 hours ago

      After understanding a lot of things it’s clear that it didn’t. And it fooled me for two weeks.

      I have learned my lesson and now I am using it to generate one page at a time.

      qu1j0t3 replies:

      that’s, uh, not really the ideal takeaway from this lesson

    • ebu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      you have to scroll through the person’s comments to find it, but it does look they did author the body of the text and uploaded it as a docx into ChatGPT. so points for actually creating something unlike the AI bros

      it looks like they tried to use ChatGPT to improve narration. to what degree the token smusher has decided to rewrite their work in the smooth, recycled plastic feel we’ve all come to know and despise remains unknown

      they did say they are trying to get it to generate illustrations for all 700 pages, and moreover appear[ed] to believe it can ā€œwork in the backgroundā€ on individual chapters with no prompting. they do seem to have been educated on the folly of expecting this to work, but as blakestacey’s other reply pointed out, they appear to now be just manually prompting one page at a time. godspeed

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        7 hours ago

        They now deleted their post and I assume a lot of others, but they also claim they have no time to really write and just wanted a collection of stories for their kid(s). Which doesnt make sense, creating 700 pages of kids stories is a lot of work, even if you let a bot improve the flow. Unless they just stole a book of children’s stories from somewhere. (I know these books exist, as a child from one of my brothers tricked me into reading two stories from one).

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      13 hours ago

      looks like there’s either downvote brigade keeping critical comments at +1 or 0, or reddit brigading countermeasures went on in defense of wittle promprfondler