For what itās worth I know one of the founders of e/acc and they told me they were radicalized by a date they had with you where they felt you bullied them about this subject.
A-and yep, thatās my dose of cursed for the day
For what itās worth I know one of the founders of e/acc and they told me they were radicalized by a date they had with you where they felt you bullied them about this subject.
A-and yep, thatās my dose of cursed for the day
Itās a bird! Itās a plane! Itās⦠Evangelion Unit 1 with a Superman logo and a Diabolik mask.
āA case for courage, when speaking of made-up sci-fi bullshitā
Thomas Claburn writes in The Register:
IT consultancy Gartner predicts that more than 40 percent of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by the end of 2027 due to rising costs, unclear business value, or insufficient risk controls.
That implies something like 60 percent of agentic AI projects would be retained, which is actually remarkable given that the rate of successful task completion for AI agents, as measured by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) and at Salesforce, is only about 30 to 35 percent for multi-step tasks.
Itās like when Scott Aaronson got me to sympathize with a cop. A sneersmas miracle.
I poked around the search results being pointed to, saw a Ray Kurzweil book and realized that none of these people are worth taking seriously. My condolences to anyone who tries to explain the problems with the āimprovedā sources on offer.
Adding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_alignment to the compendium for completenessā sake.
Rather than trying to participate in the āarticle for deletionā dispute with the most pedantic nerds on Earth (complimentary) and the most pedantic nerds on Earth (derogatory), I will content myself with pointing and laughing at the citation to Scientific Reports, aka āwe have Nature at homeā
Wow, this is shit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_alignment
Edit: I have been informed that the correct statement in line with Wikipediaās policies is WP:WOWTHISISSHIT
Iād disagree with the media analysis in āWhat Was The Nerd?ā at a few points. For example, Marty McFly isnāt a bullied nerd. George McFly is. Marty plays in a band and has a hot girlfriend. Heās the non-nerd side of his interactions with Doc Brown, where heās the less intellectual, and with George, where heās the more cool. Likewise, Chicago in Ferris Buellerās Day Off isnāt an āurban hellscapeā. Itās the fun place to go when you want to ditch the burbs and take in some urban pleasures (a parade, an art galleryā¦).
Because of course.
You know, just this once, I am willing to see the āDead Dove: Do Not Eatā label and be content to leave the bag closed.
Or was it a consequence of the fact that capital-R Rationalists just donāt shut up?
I suppose you could explain that on the talk page, if only you expressed it in acronyms for the benefit of the most pedantic nerds on the planet.
feels like they are wrong on the object level
Who actually wants to sound like this?
There might be enough point-and-laugh material to merit a post (also this came in at the tail end of the weekās Stubsack).
The opening line of the āBeliefsā section of the Wikipedia article:
Rationalists are concerned with improving human reasoning, rationality, and decision-making.
No, they arenāt.
Anyone who still believes this in the year Two Thousand Twenty Five is a cultist.
I am too tired to invent a snappier and funnier way of saying this.
Iām the torture copy and so is my wife
In other news, I got an āIs your website AI readyā e-mail from my website host. I think Iām in the market for a new website host.
Huh, whatās this I have open in another browser tab: