We're allowing non-IRL underage looking content - Lemmy NSFW
lemmynsfw.com
When I opened this site 5 days ago, I could not have guessed that I would post such a post. But here we are. As you know, we did a poll on this topic here [https://lemmynsfw.com/post/26029]. Around 40% of people said to block, the rest said to not to. In such cases, we wanted to make the poll, even though it doesn’t matter. Right now, I’m still currently agreeing with @bobbiguy2122 [https://lemmynsfw.com/u/bobbiguy2122] here [https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/82152]. We are going to let community moderators handle the situation in within limits. So it’s going to be users choice to subscribe to that community or creating new one with his own rules. #### Why not completely block it I think we should not ban this pleasure just because it is in a dangerous area. #### As a result First of all we will explicitly ban IRL loli images. Although we will allow non-IRL content under moderator control, tho we will control childish content independently of moderators too. We will make this distinction according to images that look and act like children. #### Defederation I see a lot of people are worried about this situation. But I don’t care. Because as you can see, beehaw, one of the largest instances, blocked the other 2 largest instances. This situation is inevitable in NSFW only instances like us. As a result, you must have one main account, where you can access all instances, and one NSFW account, where you can only access NSFW content. For example, I don’t plan to block any instances on this instance, except in extreme cases. Edit: @[email protected] [https://lemmynsfw.com/u/RestfulD34m0N] is going to publish a post to what we really allowing or not. Please wait for it. I think people misunderstood me.

Lets not beat around the bush here, lots of people like to look at boobs and dicks.

Lemmynsfw was looking like a good place to go, but reading the “Loli” announcement thread where they equate drawn child porn to petite women, its clear the owner is not the right person to be hosting a NSFW instance for the majority of people.

Is there anywhere else that people can recommend?

There is undoubtably a need for such an instance. Can we discuss this like adults?

  • Otome-chan@kbin.social
    11·
    2 years ago

    loli/shota are BANNED and not okay in any way.

    characters who are petite/young-looking are ALLOWED

    These are contradictory statements. that’s literally what the words loli/shota mean.

    • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
      1·
      2 years ago

      i mean at that rate loli/shota mean nothing

      being on guard for pedophiles is good, but the obsessive policing of how petite women are allowed to be while still being ‘okay’ to sexualize has gotten extremely silly, both when it comes to art and when it comes to actual women sexualising themselves

      • Otome-chan@kbin.social
        1·
        2 years ago

        loli/shota haters are gonna lose their shit when they find out about oppai loli. if loli referred to minors, such a thing simply couldn’t exist lol.

        the reality is that loli/shota have nothing to do with age.

          • Otome-chan@kbin.social
            1·
            2 years ago

            yup. people hating on this clearly ave no idea what they’re talking about. like there’s a clear distinction between actual anime children and loli content. and there’s plenty of people who like the latter and not the former. it’s not hard to understand.

            • Penekr@kbin.social
              1·
              2 years ago

              Lolicon does depict minor characters engaged in sexual acts. Whether that is exclusively or not doesn’t really matter. Although it doesn’t surprise me to see you here defending it. You have trash fucking takes on every topic you engage in.

              • Otome-chan@kbin.social
                1·
                2 years ago

                the cool thing about the fediverse and open platforms is that we are free to agree to disagree. the second you start defederating, silencing, or banning people over disagreements, is the second you start building an echochamber and leading to situations like what reddit or twitter have. If you don’t like the stuff I comment or share, then you’re free to block me.

                But why does your dislike of what I wish to discuss/say/share mean that I shouldn’t be allowed to do so and discuss with others who do wish to speak to me?