Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones cannot use his personal bankruptcy to escape paying at least $1.1 billion in defamation damages stemming from his repeated lies about the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school massacre, a U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled Thursday.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2521 year ago

    They say this, yet he’s still making and spending to the tune of 100k per month and the courts aren’t doing anything about it. Rich people don’t get to go broke like the rest of us, he’s gonna keep living in a nice house and making millions and get away with not paying anyone, and the courts won’t do shit

    • fiat_lux
      link
      fedilink
      1011 year ago

      This is part of due process in doing something about it. Unfortunately it’s a lot faster to commit crimes and get “creative” with moving money in not-quite-crimes-but-still-bullshit than it is to weigh up their legality and enforce appropriate penalties.

      When a legal system relies heavily on precedent as guidance and technicalities can destroy a decision, and fixing that might take decades and destroy lives, you have to make sure it’s good. Especially when this many people are watching.

      Unfortunately you’re very right that the slow speeds to ensure precision are easily and visibly exploited by scumlickers like Jones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      361 year ago

      I can see why you would think this, but this is a very unusual case. Particularly so given the decision in this article.

      You’re dead right in that rich people don’t go broke like the rest of us - because they have accountants and lawyers set up complex business structures so if something falls over they can just walk away (or drive away in their nice car to their nice house).

      This article is pretty much saying that all that usual dance isn’t going to work in this case - he still has to pay $1.1b.

      Also, there’s no law that prevents him from going on making money. That may not feel “right” or just but that dynamic is the same even for poor people. That said, at 100k per month it would take him 916 years to pay $1.1b soo… he might curtail his luxurious lifestyle, maybe not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1051 year ago

    Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving “person”. This isn’t going to bring the kids back but at least it’ll stop people from fucking harassing the parents decades later. Jones is mentally fucked up and he deserves to be locked up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 year ago

      And yet I believe he still will not pay them a dime… just like if trump loses all his court cases in New York, I really believe he will just refuse to pay and force them to chase him around asking for that money for the rest of his life. Rich people never have to pay fines in the US, its all for show, they always find a way to get around everything.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The victims will almost certainly not see the full $1.1B, or even anything close to that. Not because Jones will hole up his money and refuse to pay, but because Jones doesn’t have the assets to cover it, and never will. With a judgement hanging over him, he will be unable to raise the capital necessary to ever pay it back–it takes money to make money, especially when you need to crack the billion dollar mark.

        Jones himself is still fucked. Rich people get away with stuff because they hire good lawyers. Jones forgot that part of the plan.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Jones hired good lawyers, then fired them, then hired more, then fired them, then hired more, then fired them… etc.

          During the sandyhook trials he went through something like 30 lawyers. Often the parents lawyers interacted with a different set of lawyers basically on every deposition.

          I have to imagine Jones’s lawyers told him to STFU, which he never could do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        You are aware that he doesn’t have a choice whether he pays, right?

        Court orders will be issued for his assets. You don’t see rich people paying for their crimes because they get away with it. Successful scumbags don’t put themselves in positions like this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          Right. Successful scumbags have lawyers that are worth a damn, and make some kind of defense before the judge stops waiting and enters a default judgement. Jones already failed that part. The rest is inevitable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Successful scumbags listen to their lawyers every now and then BEFORE they get sued. At least then if they do get sued their asses are coverable.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Yeah but the way he incorporated the business, his parents own most of the business interests, which is going to take a lot to claw back. It’s really insidious.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    771 year ago

    That’s… wild.

    Aside from whatever you feel about this guy, he’s fucked. It might take some time but the victims will start to get court orders to seize his assets, which they can then present to banks, police, and other authorities, who will then turn them over directly.

    The USA has it’s fingers in almost every financial network in the world and Alex Jones can no longer be safe anywhere except basically crypto, bad actor countries, and I guess cash in his mattress. For the rest of his life. And he can’t escape it with bankruptcy.

    He’ll be better off trying to get citizenship in Russia or China or something and never coming back.

      • SuperJetShoes
        link
        fedilink
        211 year ago

        Yep, good. Look at the damage he did. He’ll have sufficient funds to have food and shelter. Anything beyond that he does not deserve.

        How much divisiveness did he cause?
        How many screaming arguments?
        How many families did he break up?
        How many bar room fights?
        How much pain for grieving parents?

        Fuck him, he’s a cunt.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          He’ll have sufficient funds to have food and shelter. Anything beyond that he does not deserve.

          According to other comments here, referring to OJ’s case, this is not likely to happen.

          • SuperJetShoes
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            OK, point taken. He’ll have sufficient funds to live a comfortable life (which is disgraceful for a bankrupt individual). But at least there’s the satisfaction in knowing he won’t get it all.

            Apologies for the misunderstanding. I’m from the UK where it’s tougher to game the bankruptcy laws and you need to lie before court.

            Edit: typos

    • arglebargle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      You would think he would pay, but look at OJ. Verdict to pay 30 million, and after all these years he only did 130,000.

      Getting assets seized and wages garnished is not as easy as you would think.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Yeah that’strue. From what little I know OJ is allowed to make/keep enough so that he’s far from destitute, but he sure hasn’t don’t anything redeeming since.

        I guess if you know your work would lead to money that you can’t keep, you’d choose to just not work.

  • Yote.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    751 year ago

    I’m not really in the loop on this but can someone ELI5 why Alex Jones is the only one that’s being forced to pay money for the shit that comes out of his mouth? It seems like everyone else is doing whatever they want with no repercussions.

    • fiat_lux
      link
      fedilink
      1591 year ago

      He made very specific defamatory statements accusing fellow citizens / parents of murdered children of participating in a government conspiracy and those people were able to prove they experienced harm as a consequence of his words.

      The plaintiffs also had enough financial backing from (understandably horrified) strangers, and a high enough chance of winning for lawyers to want to represent them. Those factors allowed the plaintiffs to survive the legal system long enough to get a ruling, and the severity of the situation maintained their motivation to keep pushing for it instead of accepting settlement so they could somewhat move on with their lives.

      Sometimes, the planets align to create the trifecta of enough energy, money, and evidence to force the justice system into enforcing justice. And I am grateful that can sometimes still happen, as rare as it feels.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        I prefer to think thusly:

        “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

        —Martin Luther King, Jr.

        But I can certainly understand people’s pessimism, looking at the world around us…

        • fiat_lux
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          That’s fair, I’m not a flat-bow conspiracy theorist, even if the curve looks real flat right now from down here.

        • balderdash
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I wonder if MLK ever read Hegel. I know he got a doctorate so it’s not outside the realm of possibility.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 year ago

            I’m not holding my breath. Rich people do not play under the same rules as normal people. Bankrupt me and I’m on the street. Bankrupt rich dudes and somehow they still have lawyers, nice clothes and roofs over their heads that they own.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Depends on which chapter of bankruptcy, which all entail wildly different things. There’s bankruptcy that effectively eliminates debt and others which force you and your debtors to come to the bargaining table to restructure your payment plan or they get nothing since you could just file for actual bankruptcy

              The difference is if you can afford to pay for the lawyers necessary to create that restructuring or if there’s any trust at all that you can pay it off eventually without getting yourself deeper in debt

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Jones isn’t important enough to the machine that they’ll expend any energy or resources sheltering him. I bet this does get him in the end.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Alex Jones and/or his lawyers were too stupid to show up to court and defend themselves, so Jones automatically lost a defamation lawsuit without anyone even proving that Jones lied.

      Wow, you might be thinking, that’s great for these plaintiffs but surely nobody else would be dumb enough to ignore a defamation lawsuit and thus instantly lose! Well, let me introduce you to a certain Donald J Trump.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        451 year ago

        Yeah, his lawyers were super incompetent. They pretty much proved to everyone he was lying.

        Damaging Alex Jones texts mistakenly sent to Sandy Hook family’s lawyers

        Attorneys for the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones “messed up” and sent to his legal adversaries “every text message” he had written in the past two years – contradicting claims Jones had nothing on his phone pertaining to the deadly Sandy Hook school shooting, which he long maintained was a hoax, it was revealed at his defamation trial on Wednesday.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          251 year ago

          It went even further than just sending the messages. Jones’ attorneys sending those could maybe have been a mistake. Had opposing counsel just gone and used them it could have bogged the whole process down horrifically. They’d likely appeal and fight that hard. So opposing counsel did the ethical thing and informed Jones’ attorneys multiple times seeking clarification and basically covering their own ass a bit. Jones’ attorneys didn’t respond. They could have said “that was a mistake and privileged so you can’t use them”, but they didn’t. Jones first found out in court while being cross examined. It was hilarious.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The video I saw of the lawyer telling AJ in court that he had all that and his lawyer did fuck-all to fix it is FANTASTIC.

          Edit - Its in the link! WATCH IT

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        I think they were afraid of discovery revealing even more malicious information than what’s being assumed.

        • ZeroCool
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          After listening to all of the Knowledge Fight podcast’s 70+ hours worth of coverage of both cases (including multiple interviews with the plaintiffs lawyers)… I don’t believe for a minute that Alex Jones’ lawyers are competent enough to attempt a devious strategy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            131 year ago

            Fun fact: they actually just fined Alex $1 for each time he said “I don’t remember” or “I don’t recall that” during the depositions and that’s how it got up to over a billion.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Minor correction, Dan didn’t testify. He was present for some of the depositions of Alex in the TX case, being there to help guide Mark Bankston’s questioning. Mostly mentioning cause Dan was pretty clear he didn’t want to actually testify

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Only for his lawyers to send the prosecutors a copy of every text message that he sent and received for the last 2 years. Haha

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        There’s a proto-fascist idea out there that authoritarians can find all the best people and put them in positions to do their best work. What actually happens is that they select people for personal loyalty first and competence a distant second. This is why Trump and Jones have such shit people on their legal teams.

    • circuscritic
      link
      fedilink
      56
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On top of everything else, his idiot lawyer accidentally emailed ALL of the discovery evidence that they had claimed didn’t exist TO THE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY. As well as no showing and getting a summary judgement.

      There is so much stupid in that trial, you really should go find a legal YouTuber who documented the various levels of idiocy and just watch in amazement.

      I’d recommend LegalEagle.

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Alex Jones got himself into this position via a trifecta of pure stupid.

      First of all, he made claims that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax. This turned public opinion against him severely, because Sandy Hook was a lines-crossed kind of event. Although school shootings are common in America, these tended to happen in colleges and high schools. Sandy Hook was an elementary school, meaning the victims were much younger

      Secondly, he called the victims of the aforementioned shooting ‘crisis actors’, people who are paid to portray victims during emergency drills. These lies by Jones directly led to harassment campaigns against families that were already grieving the loss and extremely violent deaths of their very young children. This also got national attention, and many people pitched into the responding lawsuits raised by the grieving families against Jones’s media company.

      Thirdly, and perhaps a big reason why the punishment is so severe, Jones treated court hearings and depositions as optional, and skipped a huge amount of them. He didn’t even seriously attempt to defend himself in a court of law, and when he did try, his lawyers were either idiots or actively working against him, leaking text messages (EDIT: and emails) that contradicted his own testimony. This led to a lot of default and highly punitive judgements against him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        To the third point, if they had done the minimum, they were more or less fine. The burden lied with the plaintiffs. He handed them a default judgement dream.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        He also platformed several “journalists” who were actively harassing the Sandy Hook families, repeatedly claimed one of the parents was autistic, and during the trial shared a photoshop of the judge as a demon or something. He was bragging the entire time that he was “bankrupt” and they wouldn’t see a dime, while his series of weird shell corporations (lots of money hidden with his parents) was unfolded before the court.

        He was in Hawaii like two months ago on vacation/looking for Zuckerberg’s secret hideout lol.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      I hear ya. There are at least some other recent examples. The settlement between Fox News and Dominion. Giuliani is being held to account for libeling the Georgia poll workers. And of course all the Trump cases. But yeah, feels like a drop in the ocean.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Because most public figures leave themselves some wiggle room.

      Like “just asking questions” or being careful to qualify their statements.

      “Some people are saying that Sandy Hook was a fabrication, and I think they make a pretty convincing case. Are the parents hiding something?” vs “these parents of so called victims are lying, they’re actors hired by the government to take away our guns”

      Plus I think Alex Jones included some calls to action that led to harassment of these grieving families - he didn’t leave himself any way to wiggle out of it. Especially since his exposed communications made it obvious he had no valid basis to assert he believed it , and he showed contempt for the legal process

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      most of these dorks settle to avoid discovery, alex jones basically thinks rules don’t apply to him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -31 year ago

      Because Jones is a fat sausage greaseball who was just a useful idiot. His usefulness has run its course.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Don’t pretend Jones was just an innocent victim in all of this. He wasn’t used. He knew what he was doing. That’s why he’s made so much money off of it.

    • Raz
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Dude, what the fuck. How morally bankrupt is the US?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        241 year ago

        Think of the lowest point you can imagine and still have a functioning society. Realize there’s at least a solid third that want to go lower than that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Debtors prisons are still illegal and don’t exist in the US. It’s all explained in the article, but the issue is really that poor people have bad legal representation, local judges aren’t all great, and private debt collection is out of control.

      In the US, your creditors should generally only be able to garnish your wages up to legal maximums. You can’t get prison sentences in civil trials.

      Arrests are a last-resort way for a court to force someone to appear. The other jail time is basically contempt of court for failing to comply with court orders. These should probably exist in general, but they are likely misapplied for the above reasons in these cases.

      Write to you representatives about the above stuff, not debtors prisons, since they won’t know what you are talking about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How is that constitutional?

      EDIT: The U.S. government needs to be overthrown so bad 🤦

      • tech
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        That article is about state governments. Overthrowing the federal government probably won’t be the best course of action.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Overthrowing any state or local government would require taking on and overthrowing the feds by the nature of the hierarchy.

  • SammyV2
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    I was once told by a wise man, “Jar-jar Binks has a Caribbean, black accent”.

    This is what the “loser little, lil titty baby” deserves. Only a shame it’s arriving so late.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I think it’s extremely unlikely he’ll earn a billion dollars before he drops dead of an aneurysm in the middle of a far right screed.

      It’s a thousand million dollars and it’s been years since they needed him to funnel unmedicated schizophrenics into political extremism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yeah I know the number is kinda for show. It’s more to keep him laying indefinitely. Only question is how he even pays the fraction he’ll be able to pay in his lifetime.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Yeah, schadenfreude aside, I’m glad that someone doing obviously criminal shit is seeing repercussions. The guy could have worked a normal job, done normal journalism. Instead, he decided that spreading hateful misinformation is a business model. This punishment makes it not a business model.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Very much TBD on that one, I don’t think he has paid a dime or changed his lifestyle at all. His show is the same and he’s still raking it in.