• Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1141 year ago

    Probably worth noting, this article is about UK energy meters. Also, smart meters are wildly different all over the world.

    Where I live, the meters have a proprietary wireless receiver, with its own frequency, that is owned and operated by the power company.

    • circuscritic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s going to vary, even within counties. A lot of US utility companies are having the same issue, and there are companies that make and sell 3G to 4G adapters for larger coverage areas. For example, microcell that rebroadcasts/converts the 3G signals into a 4G signal for the local towers. Other areas are swapping out 3G for 4G or Lorawan style meters.

      And I’m sure even more are just going to arbitrarily create billable usage figures because they outsourced their IT to India, and then outsourced the India team to Pakistan or the Philippines, and then fired them because the CEO’s son is really good with computers. Unfortunately, he’s just now reading my comment and going “oh…fuck”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        How would those microcells be legal? It’s not just that 3G or whatever gets shut down, the frequencies are usually reallocated to something else so you can’t legally operate a 3G network on those frequencies anymore.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          It would depend how regulations are written. It’s perfectly conceivable that these can be allowed to operate using a very low power level that wouldn’t interfere with the larger network, especially if the use case is for things like substations that are already isolated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Around here (Portugal) I believe that smart meters send their info over the electrical wire itself (as they had to install repeater/transponder stations at the network transformers and the bandwidth needed for something like this is ridiculously small).

      Certainly it would be an upside of being behind most of the rest of Europe in most things - when finally something gets installed in the infrastructure of one of the local politically connected (read: not really competing on superior quality or efficiency) utilities, the technology is already more mature.

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        It’s common all over Europe. It’s short range wireless btw, a person from the company has to walk the building halls to collect the data from the meters for example, or come near the house. They use this on all types of meters — power, gas, water.

        They still have to do a visual check once in a while because some people are shifty fuckers and can’t be trusted. 😄

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      I thought they weren’t turning off 2G. What’s the benefit? Other than forcing it sooner? Most places that used 2G still get exceptional coverage from it.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 year ago

        Coverage is from frequency, not generation of signal encoding.

        The benefit is you can reuse the frequency bands for something better, like 5G. That’s what they did in my country, among others. So, now we get 5G on 3 different frequency ranges. High speed and long range.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 year ago

          I was under the impression that higher bandwidth wireless networks required higher frequency bands for that data. Like a specific frequency should have a theoretical maximum data transfer rate and the only way to get around that would be some kind of fancy compression algorithms.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            That is correct.

            However the lowest GSM frequency was 300Mhz, so there is still quite a lot of bandwidth there (if I’m not mistaken to a theoretical maximum of 600Mbit/s for a 2 level signal, though in practice quite a lot less as this are radio-waves rather than signals in circuit lines, so encoding schemes have to be disgned for a lot more noise and other problems).

            Anyways, the point being that the right encoding scheme can extract some Mbit/s from even the 300Mhz band.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            Frequency isn’t that relevant, it’s frequency bandwidth. The bit rate is n/T with n being bits per symbol and T symbol duration which itself is 1/B with B being the frequency bandwidth. You want to increase the bit rate you can either increase the number of bits per symbol or increase the frequency bandwith. 5G allows bandwiths up to 400MHz per channel, there isn’t enough space in the lower frequency ranges for such large bandwidths, so you go up.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Isn’t the infrastructure for 2G also a factor? Over here for example we have lots of towers in remote mountain regions, rather complicated to upgrade all of them. It can be done but it will take a while.

          • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Not complicated at all. For the most part, all they do is swap one box - the transmitter. That’s it.

            (However, that doesn’t consider other things, like improvements in redundancy and safety, or construction standards that didn’t exist back then.)

            But really, all that needs to be done is pull out one box, and slide in a new box. Not complicated at all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I’ve done this as a project to go from 3G to LTE for a network of a few hundred devices.

      3G and LTE (4G) used almost identical AT commands. The motherboards were build so the modems were swappable. It wasn’t too bad. I’m told the field techs had to drive 5 hours across the Australian outback to access some of them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        After rolling out 3g router fail over for pokies, lotto, wagering in Oz I’m sure the money they saved from no longer having any downtime can pay for 4G, 5g, and starlink redundancy.

        5 hours of driving across Oz? Wouldn’t even make Carnarvon Gorge much less Mount Isa.

        Beautiful country to drive across tho.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I was wondering how this would affect car manufacturers and their TCU’s or what have you. Curious to know if cars will be bricked when this is obsolete and they turn off 2G and 3G.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        My 2013 Focus Sync 2 software that does system checks shit down like 6 years ago and I periodically get a message that I need to do a diagnostic check and send it in to Ford, but then it errors out.

        It’s annoying as fuck.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is it one of the ones where you can update the software from a USB stick and software off the internet or does it have to do with looking for a software update then timing out because the network isn’t there?

          I was wondering my previous question because I know Mozilla just put out a report on how if you own a newer car your automaker is tracking you via the modems built into the cars.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            It is actually dumber than that.

            It wants to use my phone to make a call and transmit the data like an old school modem. There’s not built in modem in the car as far as I can tell. It’s a 2013 Focus Titanium.

  • rem26_art
    link
    fedilink
    361 year ago

    oh our water company mentioned they were gonna come this week and replace the meter. I guess this is what thats about lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          NZ and many other places are doing energy meter replacements (or just modem replacements in the existing meters) due to 2G/3G switch off.

          I don’t think anyone does cellular water meters, though. Cellular needs a decent amount of power which is too much to expect from either a ten year battery or trying to use the metering hardware as a generator.

          Smart water and gas meters therefore generally use a short-range low power mesh radio system.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Aren’t water systems typically installed alongside electrical systems though? Seems like powering the meter should be a non-issue in most circumstances.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Water meters are installed in a variety of places - while some might be in the building, plenty will be in a pit at the street.

              Even if it’s in the same building, you now have the builder/homeowner’s electrician needing to supply power to the meter that could be on the other side of the house from the electrical service. Should it be supplied from a dedicated circuit for reliability? If it’s a retrofit, who pays for the wiring - and plaster/paint for the walls if it wasn’t an easy run?

              What if the owner turns the power off and goes away for a month while leaving the garden sprinklers on? Is that OK?

              Electrically powered electrical meters work fine because if the meter isn’t powered, nothing else is anyway. And it has to have all the safety and mechanical features for permanent connection to and safe usage of mains power, which adds substantially to the cost.

              Trivia: the energy consumed by electric meters is not negligible, though it’s fairly small. The meter is designed so that it does not measure its own power consumption - the power company pays for that, not the customer. Should the customer pay for the water meter’s electricity consumption.

              Extra trivia: A suitably efficient turbine could provide the watt or two of power a meter needs to transmit by leaking about a teaspoon or two of water down a drain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Surelly they would’ve used the word “wankers” or “cunts” when refering to the water company if they were???!

          (Or maybe “those wankers at” is always implicitly prefixing “the water company”)

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          True, but I was saying that because it’s about energy meters, not water meters.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            There are many devices that use 2g for data, not just energy meters. ATMs, card payment terminals, alarms, gps trackers, all sorts of qpplications that don’t need a lot of data and can benefit from the better coverage/range of 2g.

  • TimeSquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yep. I’ve been going around converting burglar and fire alarms to 4/5G and trashing the 3G radios. If you haven’t upgraded, your alarm won’t alert your monitoring company if that’s the sole path.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      1G is important. Most emergency services are based on it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        2G defines basic mobile services, for example telephone or SMS.

        3G, 4G etc. added internet to it, but there they are interchangeable. Each new one replaces the former if you use only the internet service. But none of them replaces 2G fully.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s more that all should be backwards compatible, so if you have 5g then you still have 2g and it gives you the bare minimum voice and some scraps of data.

          They can reclaim all the spectrum for 3 and 4g (which is a lot) for 5g, while leaving some of the barest functions working for stuff that doesn’t need real data.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 year ago

            You can read in the spec why they chose not to be backwards compatible. The cons were too great.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              5g low band actually does, they have down to 600mhz bands which are crazy low with tons of noise shaping, mimo, beamforming and other stuff to potentially bump the snr.

              They’re looking to add 400mhz bands for even more range, but the low bands have less capacity.

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    I’ll be fucked if I’m getting a smart meter anyway, I’ll stick with nice normal top-up prepay meters thank you kindly.

    I don’t trust British Gas as far as I can throw em.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        351 year ago

        It’s relatively new and is a lovely way for utilities companies to side step the rules on cutting people off. They advertise it as an option for people so they have more control over their spending when in reality it has a higher unit charge and is targeted at people who are likely to be financially struggling or close to it.

        So what happens is it can just shut off when you haven’t paid yet. I work in utilities and I have dealt with literally thousands of homes and these are always in impoverished and working class areas where if the people were to be on a standard policy they would have protections against cut off due to non payment.

        This isn’t meant as any disrespect to the guy above, I know two sentences about him and that all, just my view of this bullshit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah I don’t think it’s new just something you only see in poor areas, it’s of course the most expensive way of getting electricity too because they love rubbing a bit of salt in when they screwing the poor.

          I remember going to my friends house, the power shut off Saturday night and the post office didn’t open until Monday so we were basically camping in his house getting high by candle light.

      • Dharma Curious
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        In some places, you pay for utilities before using them, and they shut you fuck off right in the middle of the month if you’ve used it up. :/

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        I would not want to miss the feeling of getting up at 3 am to put a farthing in the meter to keep the room above freezing.

    • @Kushan
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -181 year ago

    They should have stuck with the mechanical meters. They are reliable and last nearly forever.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      801 year ago

      Mechanical meters are terrible for tracking real time consumption and managing the grid efficiently. They also pay for themselves because they can catch tampering and don’t require utilities to pay people to bumble around homes to read stupid meters.

      Mechanical meters make no sense. They’re a waste of money and not great for a grid that requires intelligence to help get off fossil fuels.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 year ago

        Also, I’m very happy with our smart meter because I haven’t gotten a single wildly-inaccurate “estimated bill” since it was installed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Oh, I have. The meter stopped transmitting and they just started making stuff up. They did it for months and refused to admit the meter was broken.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      It’s cheaper to change all the meters one more time than going back to a human driving his car from house to house to do manual readings…

      Also better for the environment.