As the title says, we’ve got a lot of reports about this, and we have Rule 7 - Should we take a hardline stance of no OF/SC/links etc? Vote in the comments.

  • yesbum
    link
    fedilink
    84
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it should be allowed in titles, watermarks, comments etc but I don’t see a problem with it being on someone’s profile so long as it’s not in the community. Just my opinion 🤷🏻‍♀️ Although, I was banned from reddit gw for having redgifs (which some subs require you to post with) and lemmy linked on my profile. Kind of silly since I asked if it was okay and was told I could continue posting, only for them to change their mind a couple days later.

    • SnuSnu 💘OPMA
      link
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah that’s what I don’t want to happen here, there have been a LOT of reports lately from a few users mentioning Rule 7 being broken for this sub.
      I’ve largely ignored them, because I know we’re been quite lenient about that rule in the past.

      The rule does say that they shouldn’t be allowed at all, so that’s the reasoning, but I don’t want to suddenly remove a ton of content that is otherwise well-accepted. 👍

      There is something to say for you being active here though :) - there are other OF users who don’t engage or comment on Lemmy, which becomes a problem when these “bot users” posts their OF adverts across multiple communities at the same time, and doesn’t do anything else (comment, etc).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Reddit GW banned me as well although and I never ever even considered posting there 😅 never mind having an OF account.

      Simply because I had uncovered a catfishing account on a previous post years back by pointing out that they weren’t who they claimed to be and linking the OF account as proof.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    571 year ago

    Yeah, ban them. I want people to post because they want to, not because they are advertising. Makes the posts more genuine as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I don’t see a problem with it if it’s in your bio because if I’m really interested in the person, then I would at least click their profile to see their other posts.

    • @lemmyboi
      link
      -61 year ago

      There will be no incentive, it should be limited but not outright banned

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    421 year ago

    Advertising, in my opinion, goes against the spirit of gone wild. I have no problem with OF as a platform, but I’d like to think gone wild is more spontaneous. Just my two cents. If people are that interested, they’ll click into the profile and find plenty an OF link.

  • @AnaisRim
    link
    371 year ago

    No.

    The best content creators here have OF accounts. They need to eat too. Close them off and this place will slow to a crawl.

    This is a self-defeating move.

  • @BlaTRUS
    link
    371 year ago

    Probably ban links in posts/comments, but not on profiles. I think that’s a good in between stance that will keep this comm’s vibe while not driving away literally all the content.

  • El Chango Unchained
    link
    351 year ago

    If you share quality content here, you should be able to include a link to your OF for those that want more. What I think is not ok is low effort, teaser posts with an OF link. They do not add value to the community. Want to link your OF? Make sure to contribute some OC. No reposts!.

    • @PutangInaMo
      link
      61 year ago

      And that is what this all turns into if we allow links in posts.

  • @Gimpydude
    link
    311 year ago

    I’m 100% OK with OF creators posting but they should keep the links in their profile. The flood of posts with subscription links are annoying.

    • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
      link
      91 year ago

      Right - Profile is something a user affirmatively seeks out. Posts are part of the feed, so post links are more readily defined as spam. But profile links should be fine, and frankly I think it is most compatible with a sex-positive attitude that isn’t morally opposed to these people making money on OF.

  • @kapnova9
    link
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Are people seriously getting mad at women for giving them free content and suggesting you can support them if you like it and want to see more?

    This place will die without sex workers.

    • @Oftenhorny
      link
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      While I agree that this place is too small to survive without them, for me knowing that every post and interaction on here it’s just an ad to make me pay takes out a lot of the fun

      • b9999998
        link
        11 year ago

        Nobody is asking you to pay or to click on the links. Down vote (if you care so much) or simply move on.

        • @Oftenhorny
          link
          21 year ago

          That’s not the point, it still is an ad. Just like the companies that make memes as ads on socials, maybe it’s fun too but you know it has another purpose

  • @TechNickLy
    link
    231 year ago

    Confine that garbage to an onlyfansgirls channel and keep the real girls here.

  • Altair
    link
    211 year ago

    Would probably kill off a good 50% of posts. So no.

  • MaybeALittleBitWeird
    link
    21
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The first thing I do anytime a new poster posts OC is check their profile to see what they have there because it affects the nature of the relationship they are looking for here. In my opinion, if you are selling your content in any form then you have not ‘gonewild.’

    The spirit of the original sub was to allow a space for exhibitionism. When you allow it to be used as a vector for advertising then it will unfortunately devolve into the low effort posts that we’ve begun to see with a high amount of frequency lately. I don’t think a full ban on advertising will be healthy for the community with as small as it is at the moment, but there need to be some checks put in place at the least.

    I agree that all links in post titles, descriptions, and comments should not be allowed, but it should be okay for them to be in a users profile if someone chooses to seek that out. I think there should also be a harder stance taken on low effort engagement baits and OC posts where it’s clear the person themselves are not the one managing the accounts.

  • @CuminClove
    link
    181 year ago

    If there is a full ban then I think we relegate ourselves to either just getting reposts from other sites or having a tiny amount of posts. I’d like to see some restriction, but I think a full ban is too much.

    Allowing links in comments but not posts sounds about right to me. But I’m open to other proposals.

    • SnuSnu 💘OPMA
      link
      131 year ago

      This is a concern of mine, there are a lot of high-voted posts here that contains these “banned” links that I’d be removing if I listened to every content report. I also don’t want the content quality to drop to the point that we’re primarily re-posting OF advertisements.

      • @PutangInaMo
        link
        51 year ago

        Start a transition plan, give a timeline and enforce a cutoff date. Keep it in the profiles. I personally downvote every post I see with s link in it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Youre asking for a content quality drop with that ban, when what few people who do post here abandon the sinking ship

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    If OF subscribers and mods decide they want advertising, they should remove Rule 7. Until then, it should be banned, as that’s the consensus. No one seems to have a problem with links in profiles, however.