luckily this is just a 32; i had a 70 from the same brand with the same INSANELY FUCKING STUPID STAND DESIGN that i had to find something for…literally at the most extreme edges of the thing, what the fuck is this? this is so fucking stupid, it cannot be meaningfully cheaper than a proper design and it looks fucking dumb as hell and surely this has pissed off 90% of people that wanted a TV and want to put it on a little stand like a normal fucking person right??

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2491 year ago

    Centre stands need to be way more sturdy to hold it up. You can buy aftermarket VESA centre stands though if you can’t wall mount it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1361 year ago

      This right here.

      The TV comes with the cheapest removable feet, because VESA mounts exist.

    • Vanon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 year ago

      Exactly. I think an aftermarket VESA mount is pretty much required these days for modern TVs, that’s the bad news. The good news is that there are plenty of options (center base, wall, swivel, etc), some very affordable, and they should last for multiple TV generations (check VESA pattern, weight limits).

      But I get that these tiny, wide feet can be mind boggling at first, since TVs all used to have center stands for decades. Finally, TVs got too large, the cost savings and stability from two tiny feet won out over the alternative of the large, heavy single center base.

  • Carighan Maconar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1551 year ago

    The wider the TV gets, the more stable a two-feet-at-the-ends design becomes compared to a single central foot.

    Plus if you need anything else, VESA mounts are super-standard and you just get whatever you need then use it on every Tv you buy.

    • sebinspace
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For those that live in apartments, there are VESA stands that mount to the back of your furniture, and others that use a clamp for tables, so you don’t have to put holes in your walls. I use one on my desk for a fairly wide monitor.

      If you’re unfamiliar with VESA mounts, just take note of which of the two standards your device uses. These are going to be either 75x75mm or 100x100mm. Verify with a ruler, don’t rely on the literature to be accurate.

      If you wanna be mega-bougie about it, you can get just the mounting plate, and there is couple hardware available to pair it with aluminum extrusion, if you really like that 2040/2080 extrusion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Have my tv mounted on a VESA monitor arm.

      The sloped design made it a bit hard to attach the plate but it worked well enough.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Curved monitors don’t have flat mounts? Seriously? That’s stupid af.

        • Clay_pidgin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          In my experience, you get spacers to make the VESA mount flat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Who the fuck let a designer get close to the back of that thing. Only ever allow designers to view the front of anything, the back is for business.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Samsung was the culprit.
              Was fun searching for compatible M screws as a newbie at the hardware store.

              Since it’s an older model (around 2016) it was probably a trick to get a thinner look with the hardware.

          • Carighan Maconar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Interesting and slightly worrying design by the manufacturer, tbh.

            I have a TV with a sloped backside, but the VESA part had a removable panel that was replaced with a non-curved one before putting in the screws.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I wish higher end TVs had the option to buy without the stand. They always have beefy center stands in the box even though everyone mounts high end TVs.

      Now I’m just stuck with a 50lbs stand that I have no use for.

      • borari
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        The G series of LG TVs comes with a flush wall mount kit and no stand at all.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1501 year ago

    Op didn’t check the specs on the item he bought and is upset it’s not perfectly tailored to his individual tastes.

    You love to see it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Show me the affordable TV made in the last 5 years that doesn’t require a stand at least 90% as wide as the TV is

      Don’t say it’s for stability, you could move the feet to be 1/3 of the way in and it’ll be exactly as stable because it isn’t tipping over sideways. Don’t say it’s for a sound bar, this is a TCL, that’s the cheapest “I’m looking for a new TV but make minimum wage” brand you can find

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We have comically different standards for “affordable…” That 32" TV you linked is double the price I paid for my 55" TCL here in the states

        • Electric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          You call $370 for a 32 inch AFFORDABLE??? Paid half that for a 50 inch.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        If you can’t afford all of the responsibilities of owning a TV you shouldn’t take on that commitment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1371 year ago

    Putting a giant TV on a tiny stand is not normal… Be mildly infuriated at yourself, not the manufacturer

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Yep, the included feet are just something you might be able to use until you get a real mount.

      If you really want the TV to stand on furniture, buy a proper vesa mounted stand (they can be very cheap) and maybe even a proper TV table.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1371 year ago

    OP blaming their shitty decisions on others. Why are you buying something without knowing its dimensions?

    Fuck I hate people like this. The answer btw is pretty obvious. From a weight distribution perspective it’s easiest to have two feet as wide apart as possible.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      well good thing they’re a professional company with professional engineers, glad they’re taking the easy route

      i bought it because i was at the store and thought ‘damn a bedroom tv would be nice’ and it was black friday. it’s only 32" i hope it fits on the table, and if not i can rig something up, but either way, god fucking dammit these new legs are terrible design because now i have to think about this instead of them just having a damn stand in the center like everyone used to

      was sort of what i was thinking

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        So take it back? If you put it back in the packaging and said “hey, this doesn’t fit where I want it”, they should take it back. I’ve never dealt with a store that wouldn’t.

        I could see this if you ordered it online, sight unseen. Like, if the website were text-based and had no pictures and the description was “It’s a TV”. But you were at a physical store…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 year ago

          He knew the dimensions of the place where the TV was supposed to go.

          He went to the store, saw the TV, he saw the box with a picture of it.

          So he brought it home, unpacked it, placed it where it was obviously not going to be able to go.

          Then he plugged it in and turned it on.

          And instead of just putting it back in its packaging and bringing it back to the store and admit defeat. Or order a new piece of furniture Amazkea.

          He instead went on here to fucking complain.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They gambled on an eyeball measurement from memory and lost. It’s not that deep.

            They don’t need to return it because it can still be mounted on a stand or wall. And maybe they want to watch crooked Netflix in the meantime.

            …And they complained on mildly infuriating, which seems appropriate because it’s not that big of a deal.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            Actually it’s been a design standard for a long time for screens to have a single pedestal support in the center. It’s reasonable for OP to buy a TV without checking because until recently these side legs wouldn’t have existed.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              Both me and my flatmate got new TVs to replace our decade+ old ones. Cannot find a single 40+ inch TV within our price ranges that comes with a center stand, it’s all feet. It’s a shame, we liked having our TVs sitting next to each other in the living room to play pseudosplitscreen video games, but now they don’t fit.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                6
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Have you considered buying one with feet and spending $30 on a vesa stand to solve the issue?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  Before this thread, I’d never heard of them, but I fully plan on buying two of them within the next week

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Feels like everyone is taking this a little too seriously for something mildy infuriating.

          Surely, op is capable of solving this minor issue, which is why they rolled the dice that it might fit.

        • Takatakatakatakatak
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          This would involve successfully finding a wall stud to install on and the use of power tools. With the information OP has revealed about themselves, that seems like a recipe for a broken TV and half a wall ripped out or a trip to the ER. Of course it will be the fault of the drill manufacturer and they might sue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        I looked up the shittiest TV brand available at my local electronics store and yeah, they do list the width with and without stands.

        And if you plan on putting your TV on a table that is way too small, then I’d double check where the stands sit exactly, because it’s not a design problem but a you problem.

        People need to stop blaming their shitty planning on “bad design”. It’s the most common sense design that will work in most cases.

        Next you’ll have the guy who puts their TV on two separate chairs complain about the bad design of TV’s that only have a single stand in the middle ffs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Tbf, sometimes the measurements are iffy. I bought a 55 inch TV that fits comfortably on my TV table. The TV had some issues so I went through a return with the manufacturer and they didn’t have my specific TV in my size so they offered a 65 inch. I asked them if the measurements for the stand were the same and they read off the same distance as the 55 inch. I thought great! It will fit.

          TV arrives and the stand legs were just an inch short on either side of the table, definitely not the same! But it still fit. I ended up securing the TV with those child straps just in case and plan to replace the table eventually.

          Can’t wall mount at the moment because of spacing issues but eventually will.

          I had a similar issue with a monitor, the stand leg distance was listed but not the fact that it’s width is half my desk. It doesn’t help that some stores and manufacturers don’t have a standardized list either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        This is not bad design, it’s just common sense.

        People are way too entitled is the problem and assume that their bad planning/thinking automatically means something is badly designed. Blame anyone but themselves.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People very upset that a company which exists to make money has used the cheaper option for the part of a TV that 80% of buyers will leave in the box anyway.

          I saw a comment suggesting that it must only be $5 to add a proper stand. TCL made 30million TVs last year so that’s a substantial bonus for whoever made that choice.

          Breaking news! Budget TV has budget parts!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I have the same TV and built a custom stand for it. Doesn’t change the fact that the included stand is a bad design.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        This is not bad design, it’s just common sense.

        People are way too entitled is the problem and assume that their bad planning/thinking automatically means something is badly designed. Blame anyone but themselves.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Do you actually own the TV or one with that same stand? 3/3 people I know, plus OP had to do something extra to make that stand work. That’s bad design. Maybe not for the bottom line of the company, but definitely for the customer.

          Functionally the stand is garbage too even if you do have a massive surface. It’s not at all adjustable and it can easily damage your table if it shifts at all.

          But I guess, expecting a product to work out of the box without third party add-ons like a VESA stand or needing to cut grooves in a wooden block to keep it from toppling over is “entitled” now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re using anecdotes to back up your experience which is never a good sign.

            This is a fairly basic TV stand design. If you honestly know 4 people who’ve struggled with this then I’m not sure what to tell you. Personally I’ve never heard of anyone have a problem with their TV stand. I myself have a central stand and it’s pretty bulky/annoying itself and wouldn’t fit on many smaller tables. But if you have an appropriate TV stand it’s fine.

            So yeah, I do think it’s entitled that people expect every TV manufactured to magically work on their specific table, and if it doesn’t it’s badly designed. Put another way, why don’t you look up some reviews of this TV and see how many people rate it highly vs complain about the stand? When I looked at similar designs they were very highly rated, so at least for the majority of people it’s well designed and acknowledging you cannot have a single design that works for everyone.

            OP in his post said he saw it in person so they even knew what they were buying and could easily measure it. I don’t know how they can honestly go back and say it’s badly designed and doesn’t fit their table when they literally saw how it was designed and could have easily measured it out if they chose to.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              Personally I’ve never heard of anyone have a problem with their TV stand. I myself have a central stand and it’s pretty bulky/annoying itself and wouldn’t fit on many smaller tables. But if you have an appropriate TV stand it’s fine.

              You’re using anecdotes to back up your experience which is never a good sign.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I disagree that it is bad design. It’s cheap and I also find it ugly, but it does get the job done just fine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      “weight distribution”… They weight practically nothing, and even old heavy ass CRTs sat on narrow platform mounts

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Well I guess they just so it to annoy people then. There’s no other reasons why they’d do this right?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Cost cutting. When huge TVs only cost a few hundred dollars and everything else has gotten super expensive, they have to cut corners

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Why is it cutting corners though?

            Ideally you’d have the option for both a central stand and the two sides in the one box, but then that’s being wasteful and bad for the environment.

            There really isn’t a good option here. In that case I’d say it’s on the consumer to figure out beforehand what the stand is and decide whether they like it or not, not on the company to magically know what stand the consumer needs.

            Many companies do shitty things but this stand issue really is a non-issue.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Yes and then we can have other mildly infuriating posts about this from the other side - why does my TV have a shitty central stand when it could just have two stands on the side? Clearly bad design.

  • Ab_intra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1111 year ago

    To be honest they think that people plan ahead for something like this…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    671 year ago

    How do you not do research on the dimensions of anything before buying something big like a TV?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Mate I’ll have done a 3D reconstruction of the room accurate to the mm to test everything out. I’m only slightly exaggerating, I literally did exactly that when planning my new office/studio, had the room in 3D long before we got the house, built everything myself, custom desk, acoustic treatment, etc.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They’re like $150 and fit on a dresser. How much remodeling are you going to do for it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            It just takes a single measurement to avoid this… Measure/estimate width of the cabinet, look at the TV width, look at pictures of the TV. Then, if the TV is wider than the platform and has wide legs, don’t buy something that probably won’t fit.

            I agree with the others, OP rushed to buy this on black friday without enough thought and now regrets that decision.

  • GodlessCommie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    I think the fucking stupid part of this post is the OP buying a TV oversized for the space they want it on.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Pretty sure when I got my tv there was info on the box about how large of a surface it needs to stand on. OP made a big purchase without doing any planning or research and now they’re whining that something isn’t right 🙄

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    571 year ago

    So many people attacking OP and perhaps not remembering there was a time when nearly all flat panel TVs came on a pedestal mount. The designs were largely changed to mitigate claims and liability.

  • FreshLight
    link
    fedilink
    English
    551 year ago

    Hahahaha what do you mean? This has to be satire. Nobody is that dense right? If it doesn’t fit, don’t buy it lmao.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      Is it that hard to read the post? OP is right, almost every TV on the market has the same cheap, shitty plastic feet, and they’re spaced as far apart as possible so you’re unnecessarily size-limited when trying to buy something like a bedroom TV to sit on top of bookshelves or a tallboy.

      I’d like something more than 32" for my bedroom too, but I can find one new 40-42" TV on the market with a central stand now, and it is some obscenely expensive 4K OLED thing from Sony. I am keeping an eye out for older, pre-owned TVs as a result, but am yet to find any good deals.

      • FreshLight
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Central stands are just not that safe on bigger screens. Sadly, the easy way is to place feet on each side of the screen. One could always go for a wall mount.

        If you don’t like a product, don’t buy it and if you know that every product has this design, then it’s hardly a surprise when you unbox it at home.

        This posts seems like OP didn’t check if the TV would fit before buying and now they’re angry at themselves.

        • MrScottyTay
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Central stands made as shittily as the ones they put in the box, sure. A proper good central stand that uses the VESA mounts of a TV is a million times safer in my opinion

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            Almost like you get what you pay for. The manufacturer goes for the cheapest stand to make the entire TV cheaper.

            If it had a good central stand it might be more expensive and then OP would buying a different cheaper TV with shitty stands.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    The true reason is cost, those stands that are included nowadays are insanely cheap and flimsy. If you’re buying a large TV, you should budget $30-$50 for a VESA mount.

    • Marxism-Fennekinism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep, that’s what I figured happened when they went from proper swivel pedestals to those stupid wedges. Hell even computer monitors are joining in on the action, the number of brand new, fairly high end and expensive monitors whose stock base is just bolted to the back and have zero adjustments is ridiculous.

      • Marxism-Fennekinism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yep, and the manufacturer can’t even be bothered to spend that much more money to include a high quality stand with a thousand dollar TV with already high profit margins. Somehow, having to throw the default OEM parts in a landfill because they’re intentionally low quality and barely usable and being forced to buy a passable replacement separately is just a thing that they expect us to do now. Capitalism innovates y’all!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Exactly. 15 bucks is my retail cost.

          I bet mass producing those vesa feet to include in the box wouldnt even add 5 bucks to the total cost, and no one would care or notice the price, and would love the stronger, sturdier base that doesnt require the entire USS Nimitz just to set the damn thing down on.

  • Tygr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    Stand measurements are right on the box! They expect you to read them. 🤣

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 year ago

    Because you bought a really cheap TV and the little feet on the sides are cheaper than a center stand that needs to be much heavier and sturdier.

    • The Barto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah that’s one of those companies that buy bulk cheap TVs to slap their logo on and make out they’re a tech company… Looking at you Kogan.

      • @Dgs
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        TCL owns it’s own panel manufacturing company.

        The latter half of your comment are probably what use TCL panels, but in this case, this is straight from the source.

        • The Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Hmm if that’s the case I might try the TCL codes on my Universal remote, can’t get it to work with my Kogan tv.