On stuff outside of lemmygrad, we are receiving a lot of hate, especially by those who just moved from Reddit. Guess they lost their hidden privilege at Reddit as their rhetoric used to be almost universal over there, while genzedong and our other subs get censored and banned. And now, on lemmy, their stuff isn’t universal, as we are more prevalent here. Seems like they really want that hidden privilege back

  • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    dear comrades living and dead, please help give me the self control not to try arguing with all the “Lemmy is anti human rights” takes polluting the fediverse rn 🙏

  • pyska@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Most of these so called “libs” were probably just doing what they saw everyone else do. Now, “everyone else” means something different here. If I were them, I’d honestly pick up a book and skip the embarrassment. This is a learning opportunity.

  • angrytoadnoises@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I wonder if it’s struck them yet that, as their neoliberal platform fails, other platforms built on fundamentally better ideas and infrastructure are rising up. I wonder if this challenges their preconceived notions at all? Nah, it’s just a bunch of tankies.

    • PorkrollPosadist@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is definitely inducing cognitive dissonance. The developers are simply are communists trying to collectivize social media, and that will live in their heads rent free as long as they stick around.

    • Lols@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      nothing about the fediverse is inherently exclusively communist in design, and in fact actively goes against the authoritarianism that most examples of communism systems have seemingly inevitably adopted

  • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just you wait until US newscorps start advocating to ban the entirety of lemmy and its source code from the USA.

      • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        “China is a censorship dictatorship and we should ban all things that come from there to protect our free speech.” liberals probably

      • communix@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Silly you, you forgot that we’re both on the Chinese payroll and we’re Chinese bots simultaneously /s

  • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Man… I haven’t been on reddit in quite a while but I don’t remember it being such a shitlibfest. It’s really bad and it pretty well overran lemmy.ml immediately.

    • It puts me in an odd apot because I care amd believe in Lemmy as a project and I want it to grow, but on the other hand it was kinda nice to not be called a fascist… because im a communist… because that somehow makes me the antithesis of communism

      • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think there will be an adjustment period, where the Reddit habits will continue to be exhibited. Most redditors have been heavily propagandized for years. Those that stick around and don’t end up in defederated instances will eventually grow more and more deprogrammed.

        There’s currently a big push on reddit to keep the protesting communities away from a lemmy migration (downvotes, censored comments, highly upvtoed suggestions towards irrelevant alternatives that are owned by corporations and not part of the Fediverse). I suspect that the massive Western psyops mechanism is afraid to lose one of their most effective echo-chambers.

        The only concern I have is that lemmy.ml is already leaning towards tone policing, which makes it somewhat susceptible to be taken over by the shitlibs and fascists.

    • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Reddit tends to ban commies. It’s like a mini red scare: with the left removed, the right thrives.

  • Arache Louver@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    They were in used that every time that they denounced our political-conscious content, reddit ultra-politicized mods acted in instants censoring and banning, but here there is not systematic persecution of ideas, at least in most of fediverse, so they have to cry a lot… Maybe in contemporary world liberalism is only a superficial denomination of anti-communism.

      • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        i hate to say it, but i don’t want the network effect taking off. in fact, that’s a sign it’s time to leave. is it possible to ever just have a smallish community where real discussion and ideas can flourish without the rest of the US dragging everything down to the lowest common denominator?

        • Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s like those guys who say “I’m not joining fediverse because it’s full of weird people”. I mean, good riddance

        • Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          I guess you have to ask yourself, are we spreading ideas and looking to chip away at the predominant hegemony, or do we want to self isolate?

          One of the nice things about lemmy.ml is that it starts from a far left perspective and as a result of reddits own unmaking, places normies in a position of no longer being the predominant opinion in the room.

          This has two outcomes from what I can guess:

          1. Normies show up in droves, and their perspectives shift as a result of having to defend their point of view for once.
          2. Normies show up, but leave because they can’t handle not being able to call forth the shibaliths they’re so accustom to, and having their points of view challenged on equal grounds.
  • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t really consider myself a liberal or a communist. Maybe some mixture of both? I have my own ideals that probably align mostly with eastern philosophy, and maybe some more “esoteric” practices. Id like to think im well read, for being a mostly uneducated person, and I’m very accepting of just about everyone outside of violence or blind hatred, but I have never heard the term “tankie” until reddit. Is it a reference to Tiannemen Sq or something? Just curious as I like to know as much as I can. Thanks.

    Also, as someone who’s coming from reddit as of yesterday, it’s kinda cool seeing more than one political ideal, as I really don’t think there is a “perfect” system. Humans are flawed in their very nature, and tbh, we’re a little late to “get it right”.

    • popedesu@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Is it a reference to Tiannemen Sq or something? Just curious as I like to know as much as I can. Thanks.

      No, it’s a reference to Khrushchev sending tanks into Hungary during the 1956 revolt. Leftist supporters of this policy within Western nations were referred to as “Tankies” since then the term came to generally just refer to Marxist-Leninists. That is until more recently when Tankie has come to mean just any leftist a person disagrees with.

      If you’re interested in leftist theory then go to Marxists.org, it has plenty of free literature. I suggest starting with the communist manifesto just to get a general idea of the principles of communism before delving deeper into Marx and Engel’s work. (And maybe sprinkle in some Lenin too cause he’s sassy and a great read.)

      • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        OK thanks for clarification (:

        I read the manifesto in h.s. I was super into it back then, im very out of the loop though. Now if I’m gonna read some russian lit gimme some dostoyevsky. (;

        Politics are kinda, I dunno, empty feeling to me anymore. I’m jaded AF though lol. I have some communist writings in my little library, maybe I’ll dig through it for fun…but notes from the underground has my name on it. I read crime and punishment for the first time about 9 months ago and Whew what a doozy. Love that fever dream style.

        • _KOSMONAUT@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 years ago

          That emptiness is a very common feeling. Learning and doing more absolutely helps with it, though. Look into the concept of revolutionary optimism a little bit if you start reading again.

        • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not a huge fan of folks reading The Communist Manifesto as their first forray into socialism/communism. It was a pamphlet for workers in the 19th century and has some weaknesses if you’re not part of that audience.

          I would recommend Blackshirts and Reds by Michael Parenti to most people instead. We live under a more advanced stage of capitalism and it does a great job of explaining a lot of how “the reds” worked, who opposed them, and dispels common myths.

        • GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          The Manifesto was written initially in German by two Germans, though Engels was a polyglot so he probably did several translations himself, at least the English and French ones.

      • GrandmasterFrank@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        2 years ago

        That is until more recently when Tankie has come to mean just any leftist a person disagrees with.

        While there are undoubtedly people that use the term like that, I think there is a general understanding that it refers to people that can excuse or support authoritarian or oppressive actions

        • TheGreatSpoon@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          But the terminology ‘authoritarian and oppressive’ doesn’t really make sense in leftist circles where all states are understood to be just that by definition. I mean, that’s why people are socialists. Tankie is lib terminology referencing anything that undermines liberal democracy. It only makes sense when coming from anarchists.

            • TheGreatSpoon@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yes, but that doesn’t make them more authoritarian or oppressive because no matter what every state is using what it deems the most effective path to enforcing its will and if that means violence it will always resort to violence. It makes them bad communists.

              It’s not a matter of oppression or no oppression but a matter of oppressing the right people. If the USSR and PRC were perfect they would be a contradiction to their own purpose, no?

              • GrandmasterFrank@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                24
                ·
                2 years ago

                Look amigo, I get there is a lot of depth to be had in a discussion like this, but I’m just explaining what people generally mean when they say tankie.

                I would agree they are bad Communists, but unfortunately they are extremely visible and influence how non-Leftists see Communists, which is why many Leftists are quick and eager to disavow any connection with them.

                • m532@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  They are bad because they oppress the privileged, I assume. The privileged do not need communism. Leave communism to the unprivileged people.

            • m532@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 years ago

              Hey, I am one of them. The usa is always 100x worse, arguing does not change this reality.

                • m532@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  There is a world war going on and I have picked the side that fights against the usa.

                • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Words that can only be spoken by someone who’s never tried to get together with others to change things for the better. You don’t get to take an entire society and immediately make it equitable and free it of centuries of hangups. You do the revolution with the people in your country, warts and all, and struggle to make them better at the same time. You do not have the luxury of only organizing people that already 100% agree with you, nor will you be “in charge”. And, let’s be honest: any of us in charge would bring our own hangups, because all of us look back on ourselves 5-10 years ago and say, “wow that person believed some problematic things”.

                  For example, the October Revolution and Russuan Civil War were fought by, believe it or not, Russians born (mostly) in the 1800s in a semi-feudal country without universal education and a large peasantry. The communists were incredibly progressive in comparison to the rest of thr country. But because they retained some of the harmful biases of their culture at the time, you write off the whole project and carry around little lists in your head about how actually they were also just “bad”.

            • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              It’s good to endlessly excuse the USSR and PRC, as most criticisms of them are bullsit that is only believable by people with poor knowledge of history and zero capacity to critically engage with the media. Unfortunately, this is basically everyone under capitalism.

        • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Usually it means someone that actually reads history and will specifically debunk common anticommunist myths about it, i.e. historical revisionism.

          The term “authoritarian” is also used selectively by anticommunists and this pervades capitalist societies, who continue to teach cold war nonsense. It is implicitly reserved for actions of the state, for example, but this is a false distinction made solely because after any kind of a left takeover, the state is the most powerful tool the people have. Universal government healthcare is authoritarian by this selective definition. On the other hand, the assertion of massive control over people’s lives is not described as authoritarian when it comes from the private sector. Workers spend 8-16 hours per day working in petty dictatorships, working around the personalities and whims of business owners and managers, just to ensure some kind of steady income lest they lose basic human security. They are forced to migrate by poverty forced by capitalism, this system creates marginalised groups and then (sometimes slowly) treats them genocidally. Much of it was built on colonialism and neocolonialism, with the richness of the West built on uneven exchange with everyone else, a system set up at gunpoint. None of this is described as authoritarian.

          Please read more widely.

      • ShenYunFeaturingMarx@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 years ago

        I really loved Hakim’s take on it being a very privileged position within the imperial core to scold those who see the state as crucial to sustained revolution.

        • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 years ago

          yes! Same thing for how I came to understand the hatred for American soldiers. A lot of the cheering for the bad shit that happens to them comes from people who actually suffer from their actions, and made me examine how I viewed the military

      • Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        That discussion was halfway identical to my own commentary on the term four years ago. It’s a vague buzzword about 90% of the time and I’m ashamed to say that I said it unjokingly in my Fedbook days. After I understood why the people’s republics were appealing to so many (rather than dismissing the defenders as mindlessly desperate), I let go of my grudge and quit using the term for anything other than comedic purposes.

        Hearing that podcast made me wish that I could have a live conversation with Hakim. Although at this point I’d be interested in having a live conversation with any communist. In that format they’d be likelier to offer active feedback on the history that I share.

    • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s the etymology of tankie and there’s the actual ways it’s used. The etymology is rolling tanks into Hungary in 1956, which caused a solit (among many) among UK communists (who came up with the term). The usage varies wildly because liberals don’t understand politics very well and slap it on anything to the left of Obama.

      Communista understand politics through a series of criticisms of capitalism and a framework by which to understand those within it, namely economic classes whose interests align/do not align depending on the material context. You might find that some of this appeals to you, as a material grounding is more common in Eastern traditions than Western. Also we are super duper correct, so we’ve got that going for us.

      Re: flawed humans, there are of course a variety of people out there and we all make mistakes. However, it’s also important to recognize tgatva lot that is attributed to “human nature” is actually fairly recent and is either a consequence of living under the capitalist system (which came into being over a period of about 1000 years) or is just a myth spread to justify the violences done by that system to the common person.

      And re: perfection, you might like us there, too. We view the political economic system as an evolving thing that changes relative to material conditions. There is no perfext system, but there are valid struggles to replace the current one with systems that prioritize people over profit. For example, no communist would say that socialism is the solution to hunter-gatherers in Crete because hunter-gathering Crete isn’t capitalist - the idea would have no meaning. We also know and expect that the fight doesn’t stop even after a revolution, that there will still be struggles for a long time - but at least we could fight them together and with greater agency.

  • Henkire@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wait until the liberals find out that free and open source decentralized networks like Lemmy align with the general direction of communism.

    ( At least, I assume it does. I may be very wrong. In which case, I apologize. )