Not quite recently, but after skating through high school and most of college I learned that if you read through your notes before a test you remember more things. I also learned that this is referred to as “studying”.
I am convinced that being “smart” in high school and college stunted my career. I didn’t do any work in high school, and had like 2 classes that I’d consider difficult in college. I never learned the value of hard work.
I hear you. Finally ending up in a class that properly challenged me was like roller skating into wet cement.
Removed by mod
I had to check the username on this comment to ensure that it wasn’t me posting this. I’ve said these words verbatim.
Bonus points I discovered after a bachelor’s degree and most of a master’s:
If you pay attention in class you’ll understand most of the material, and the rest you can ask the professors directly. Truly astounding.
All through high school/college I just always wrote my notes once during class, then almost never referred to them again. For me, just the act of writing out the notes was usually good enough to help me retain the information, for the tests at least. I’ve forgotten most of it, but it was there when I needed it.
I think it’s a focus thing… If you take notes you give yourself a task and force yourself to pay attention rather than zoning out and telling yourself you’re still listening.
You aren’t the only one. I was taking an upgrade class at work and another student saw me taking notes. The instructor told her that a lot of his pupils do something similar.
I’ve seen several articles that claim that taking notes with pen and paper helps people retain information better than taking notes on a keyboard.
I just saw a paper on that. I think the basic idea is that the reason you remember better from handwritten notes versus typing is that each letterform has a unique shape that you have to write down. So your fingers/hands are following along by some sort of choreographed muscle memory when you’re writing stuff down, it’s like a sort of dance that our hands do, tracing out all these letter forms, there’s more uniqueness and complexity to it that somehow stays with us better. Compare that to typing where you’re literally just doing the same action over and over again, you’re just pushing buttons down. You might be able to focus more on what the professor is saying, but you’re more just passively taking it in and your mind isn’t as engaged in your note-taking.
Makes sense.
Writing things down does really help with remembering them. A good chunk of my biology class in high-school was spent copying notes in silence then the teacher reading them out loud. It was pretty effective to have to read, write, and hear the same thing.
I was you once
It’s not fun, but doing it before bed also helps in my experience.
You mean right before a test? That’s cramming.
Cramming is a form of studying, and is still significantly better than my original strategy of “I remember what they said in class”.
I think part of the problem is that schools don’t actually teach how to learn, study strategies, etc.
That annoying character in The Land Before Time is not named Sarah.
Her name is Cera. As in CERATOPS.
That annoying character
How dare you
English spelling is just fantastic. If you hear a new word, there’s pretty much 0 chance that you can look it up in a dictionary on the first try. Just imagine how “epitome” sounds to someone who isn’t already familiar with it. You’re going to have to go though every vowel before you actually find it.
Also, if you’ve never heard a special word being pronounced, but you’ve read it many times, you are pretty much guaranteed to make a fool of yourself when you finally get to use that word in a social situation. No wonder why spelling bees are a thing in English speaking countries.
I read somewhere that you should never look down on anyone for mispronouncing a word because it means they learned it by reading.
As a childhood bookworm, that lesson stuck with me.
Thank you for this.
I used to get picked on a lot by my family because I was made of books (by hs I was going through 1000 pages a day on average), and often mispronounced words I’d never heard used…
In college I took a linguistics course and learned a similar lesson about speaking and both pronunciation and word choice, and how it’s not only highly regional and always evolving, but also influenced very heavily by native tongue and socioeconomic status (how many years of education, for example, or languages spoken at home), so judging people for being imperfect speakers or writers is pointless. They are doing this wildly difficult thing, communicating, and as long as what they are conveying is understood, it was a successful exchange! Yay!
How on earth were you reading 1000 pages a day of anything? Even if you read at the extremely fast rate of 45 seconds per page of a book, that’s still 12.5 hours a day of actively reading to get to 1000 pages.
Exactly that; I spent essentially all of my time reading. In class, between classes, after school. I had no friends because I’d changed schools and was close enough to graduation to not be worth making new friends I wouldn’t keep contact with. So I read a lot. The librarians even gave me another card so I could inter-library-loan more stuff.
Wow. And I thought I was an avid reader
I thought it was “for all intensive purposes” until I finally came across it while reading, and I was reading a book a week for well over a decade at that point. That’s just the way it’s pronounced down here.
One step closer to the origin: “to all intents and purposes”. If I use that, people are definitely going to look at me weird.
But when you shared that lesson out loud for the first time, did you pronounce it correctly?
Chill dude boke warm?
This feels like a gross exaggeration of the problems with English. there’s a lot of patterns to English, despite a lot of weirdness and a lot of exceptions. But if you hear a new word, it will normally be easy to find in the dictionary on the first try. All that being said, yeah English is probably a mess compared to most languages, which is why it has spelling bees
Yeah, you’re right. That was a bit too harsh. Those patterns exist, and they make it easier to navigate this maze. Once you know the common ones, you don’t actually have to try every letter every time.
Respite was the epitome of your second paragraph, for me. (That sentence works on two levels in this context). Had always thought it was pronounced like re-spite until I said that out loud and was mocked for it.
Respite is one of those words. You don’t get to use or hear it very often. Come to think of it, I would probably pronounce it the logical way, just like you did. Ok, now I’m going to have to look it up.
Turns out, difference pages give a slightly different pronunciation: /rĕs′pĭt/, ri-ˈspīt, /ˈres.paɪt/, /ˈres.pət/. So, the first vowel is mostly /e/ and the last one seems to be /ı/ if some kind.
I just looked this up on Forvo because I thought it was pronounced ress-pite (I don’t know IPA sorry), about half of the recordings agree, while the other half says ress-pit…
English spelling is weird but thats not really a hard word to spell compared to many others. Epitome is either an e or an i, and I would argue a native speaker would lean heavily towards e as a first guess. There is no way that it starts with a, o, or u for example. That’s hardly “every vowel”. It’s at most 2 vowels and most people would have better than even odds if they heard epitome pronounced correctly.
English spelling is mostly consistent other than words from other languages, especially Welsh and Gaelic. There’s the small hiccup with the aristocrats that latinized some words too.
The first time I heard it, was in a BBC documentary about old cars. The pronunciation was nowhere near /ɪˈpɪt.ə.mi/. I think it started with something like /ə/ instead, and that sound corresponds with way too many letters and I haven’t figured out how to make any sense of that.
Fortunately, modern tools will help you find the word you’re looking for, so knowing the correct spelling isn’t that critical any more. However, I was using a paper dictionary at the time, which explains why it took so long.
Apparently I learned that as I read that just now.
The guy who runs Reddit is an utter douchebag.
That you aren’t supposed to rinse immediately after brushing your teeth. It’s better to wait 15 minutes to let the fluoride strengthen your enamel.
Been brushing the wrong way for 30 years, apparently.
Ain’t nobody got time for that!
Just spit it all out three or four times, wipe your mouth off and go about your day. You won’t even notice.
Actually rinsing isn’t needed at all
Yes, this is correct. I do not rinse. Nor do I get my brush wet before brushing. The only water I use is to rinse my brush after brushing.
Dry brushing sounds miserable… No thank you!
Silly to not even try, my friend…blunderworld…
You mouth is usually pretty wet so it does not stay dry for long.
You’re probably right, I just hate that toothpaste aftertaste and feeling in my mouth otherwise
Use the tooth brush and running water to brush your tongue clean, and spit a few times. That way you get a clean tasting/feeling mouth while not rinsing the suds from your teeth.
No dentist has ever said this to me.
A dentist said it to me years ago.
But I suspect that using a Sonicare makes a bigger difference for tooth health than not rinsing.
The fuck?
Yeah. I had to give a “how to” class and I picked brushing your teeth as a simple topic. I got to the end after brushing your teeth. I said rinse your mouth out and your done. The instructor said “the presentation was okay, but you aren’t supposed to rinse your teeth out right away.”
I had no idea as a mid to late 20 something. What else do you do wrong?
And if you throw up, don’t brush your teeth as you’re then just scrubbing stomach acid into them. Rinse and gargle with water then brush an hour later
So I tried this for a few months last year. Although I didn’t rinse 15 mins afterwards or anything - I just spit as much of the toothpaste out as I could.
Couldn’t really tell a difference other than it was strange feeling to have all the toothpaste remnants in your mouth. Maybe my teeth were slightly whiter? I eventually went back to my old ways of rinsing. Maybe I’ll try it again though.
deleted by creator
Meh I doubt it makes much difference. Especially if you live somewhere that has fluoride in the water. Most of the US, don’t know about Europe.
This is also true if you use something like sensodine for sensitivity. If you let it sit on your teeth a bit it works better
I spent 30+ years thinking that a pony was a baby horse rather than a smaller type of horse. You know how cats have kittens and dogs have puppies? Well I thought horses had ponies.
Even all the times that Lisa Simpson wanted a pony, I just thought it was similar to how a kid might want a puppy.
To be fair:
The word pony derives from the old French poulenet, meaning foal, a young, immature horse.
Quoth wikipedia.
Well this is a TIL moment. You saved me at ~28 years.
A pancake is a cake you make in a pan.
It broke my mind when I learned that one
…and when you take a detour, you are getting off your original tour. (Tour de France, tour of the countryside, etc)
Hence, why you de-tour.
Did everyone work this out at first glance? The etymology of ‘detour’ took me way too long.
Along these lines, I recently learned:
Painstakingly is pains + takingly (as in “took great pains”), not pain + stakingly.
Helicopter is helico + pter (“spiral wing”), not heli + copter.
In linguistics, this phenomenon is called rebracketing.
rebracketing.
TIL
I never knew those two either.
Love the helico-pter one. Of course!
Well, I’m there with you buddy. This is the first I see it.
Wait until you hear about butterflies and dragonflies.
Butterflies, flies that you make with butter.
Just like the way a snowman is a man made of snow.
So a woman is made of wo(e)?
Woah, man!
Have you heard about asswipes
please don’t tell me I been using them wrong
wtfffff
deleted by creator
I knew about this on some level before, but the recent posts have given me a better understanding on how in some countries people need expensive third party software to pay their taxes.
Freetaxusa.com Isn’t expensive. It’s dumb it still costs money for state but the company that lobbies the government to make our tax code complicated costs a lot more.
You can also do your taxes manually if you know you have a simple return. Or use the expensive software and check it against your manual.
It all sucks though. It should be dead simple as the government already knows 99% of everyone’s tax info.
Yeah, fortunately I live in America where filing taxes is free and takes like five minutes out of the year
1040EZ, $0, $0, $0, $0.
Taxes done
prima donna != pre-Madonna
Wanna see something cool?
≠
You aren’t ready.
In my day we just had <> and it was good enough for us.
Holy shit. I found this out less than 6 months ago. I always heard “pre-Madonna” thinking it had something to do with Madonna. I thought I was the only one. For context it took me like 30 years of hearing it before I saw it in writing.
deleted by creator
People know less than they think they do, which is why everyone calling everyone else morons is probably correct.
‘Moron’ was (and technically may still be) a clinical term meaning someone of intelligence so low they’re unable to function without supervision. Every time they invent a new non-emotionally-loaded term for low intelligence, we ruin it by using it as an insult.
It’s a beautiful thing.
That when cooking anything with leftover grease you should always dispose of the excess grease in an empty container and trash it instead of putting it down a drain.
Also that it’s best for your pipes to put your used toilet paper in a trash can instead of flushing it.
always dispose of the excess grease in an empty container and trash it instead of putting it down a drain.
This will likely vary greatly by country, but here in the UK some supermarkets have a section in their recycling centre where used grease and cooking oil can be deposited to be recycled into fuel of some sort.
Yeah, I got that as well. It’s called ‘pour it into the campfire and admire the fireball’.
In my city, in the US, they say to pour it in an old jar and then trash it.
That bit about the toilet paper isn’t true unless you have roots growing through your sewer line. A bit of copper sulfate down the drain will take care of that, though.
*Unless your landlord raises your rent 20%
That’s fair.
There’s nothing wrong with putting toilet paper down your pipes… Please do, having used toilet paper in a bin is nasty and possibly harmful to garbage company employees.
“Flushable wipes” you probably just shouldn’t use, but if you do use them those are not truly flushable and those unfortunately you do need to put in a bin. They can cause problems for your plumbing, particularly in an older house.
Most toilet papers are fine, although some systems struggle with Costco’s stuff. Toilet paper is designed to break apart in water. That said, you shouldn’t flush any other products. Paper towels don’t break down the same way, and wipes will almost certainly cause damage, even if they are marketed as flushable!!
most are in the past year kind of recent:
… that there’s a group of people who pronounce “gif” with a “soft g” sound like “jif”
… that Taylor Swift is that popular, she is seen as a political threat for her influence
… also armor bags for kids and shooter drills like it is some kind of natural disaster
Removed by mod
lol Taylor Swift dating a player and just attending the Super Bowl (not doing anything) might genuinely bring in multiple million extra viewers.
To be fair, the guy that invented gifs said it’s pronounced that way. Then again, he’s an inventor and most likely never learned how to read and also he’s wrong.
Removed by mod
No? I’m interested to hear the details of this.
It’s mostly just a function of alcohol by volume. It takes a certain amount of alcohol to get you drunk, but you can drink it a lot faster as 80 proof (40%) whiskey than you can 5% beer.
Water doesn’t get you drunk at all!
Removed by mod
A friend of mine: liters are not the same as kilograms. She’s 30…
Tbf 1L of water is 1kg, so that’s probably where the confusion is.
Does she also think CO2 emissions are measured in gigabytes?
In my country, a then 74-year-old politician seemed to think that in this interview.
They are now, sort of. People are so willing to consider the environmental impact, we actually have a “you consumed X GB this months, this is this amount of CO2eq”. Which is sad when you have even the slightest clue on how network operates.
Maybe this more of a misheard lyrics thing, but for a long time I thought “noxious gas” had to do with nitrogen oxides (NOx), and then spread to other metaphorical applications like “noxious weeds” and so on.
Removed by mod
