• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15110 months ago

    that powers genocide

    Great that he’s standing up for himself!

    or surveillance

    …ok now why did you even send your resume to Google

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      The context was Gaza though, so I mean neutrally surveillance can mean lots of things: security cameras at a convenience store, a security contract for the government or another corporation. What this person was protesting was supporting Isreal and it’s war/control over Gaza. The article sort of misses the point and the headlines really kills it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I assume that user referred to “surveillance” in a broad sense as being more complicated than simply general population data collection. For example, you can be against some data collection, all data collection, no data collection, or other specific circumstances of data collection based on its content or use case.

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      12510 months ago

      I still think that better late than never

      • deweydecibel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7210 months ago

        Yeah it’s hard to shame someone for not springing to challenge their employer on every little thing the moment they become aware of it. Sometimes it takes a bit for things to pile up to the point it’s too much.

    • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
      link
      English
      12010 months ago

      It takes a lot of courage to throw away your job, potentially career and livelihood, for your principles.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        Guy worked at Google. Could have basically gotten a tech job anywhere with that on his resume.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          My understanding is that no one’s been getting hired in tech right now due to all the hiring freezes. What world do y’all live in?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            Work in tech. I still regularly get recruitment emails. if I had google on my LinkedIn, I assume I would be getting at least twice as many.

          • capital
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            I got hired ~5 months ago at a big tech company.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              210 months ago

              Fair enough. That hasn’t been my experience for the last almost 2 years. Teams in our org have been told that if they lose people they can’t hire replacements. Shit’s sucked

              I’ve also been hearing about massive layoffs at tons of the biggest companies. I’d be surprised if they were still hiring, obviously.

        • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
          link
          English
          1510 months ago

          Would be nice if that were the case. However, a reputation or being known at least in the tech industry for being a “problem” employee definitely can harm your options.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4210 months ago

          I think this guy did what he felt he needed to do and it doesn’t have anything to do with us. Maybe it will spark change and maybe it won’t. The only thing I know for sure is that being a self righteous prick on the internet about his actions isn’t going to accomplish anything positive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2010 months ago

          The fact there is conversation around this topic and it’s getting traction means humanity has the ability to ponder this. If human perception is changed by the conversation then his act has created an entire change in society. It just depends. Similar to the shot heard round the world. You never know what that “shot” will be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1110 months ago

          Got news, clicks, eyeballs and engagement from the likes of you. Does that equal Google making the change? No, but every little insignificant bit adds up more than cynical internet comments do

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          There is no such thing as “effective protest”. There is action and inaction. Protest is an ineffective middle ground that allows the enemy to target, harass and arrest you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2710 months ago

      Nobody was worried when it was happening in the town over

      Nobody was worried when it was their neighbor

      Everybody lied to themselves when it was their friend

      And by the time it came to them there was nothing left but panic and dread.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
             Because I was not a socialist.
        
        Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
             Because I was not a trade unionist.
        
        Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
             Because I was not a Jew.
        
        Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
        

        Ironic with the switcheroo on the last group

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
          link
          fedilink
          1010 months ago

          Remember the Turner Diaries, on the Day of the Rope they don’t kill the minorities or queer folks or other “lesser thans”, they kill all the white people who are “race traitors” because they’re not also fascists.

          You are never safe from them, you’re just further down the list than who they’re after at this moment.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    7110 months ago

    I absolutely understand the sentiment of that engineer, but I also understand why they were fired. Maybe they wanted to get fired to make their point, but if they didn’t, yelling at an executive during a meeting is always a good way to get yourself fired no matter what that executive is saying.

    So while I don’t want anyone building such technology either, I hope that person knew the consequences they were facing.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If they achieved their goal, fine. I am glad they spoke out.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        710 months ago

        Okay? But that doesn’t mean they didn’t do something that would have gotten them fired in any company.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2810 months ago

      Usually engineers, while not always the most socially in tune people, aren’t total dumbasses. He also said (very publicly) that he refuses to do the work they are telling him to do so he’s explicitly telling them to fire him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        I’ve known a lot of engineers and only known two who weren’t total dumbasses. Are you sure about your assertion?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          … Says the random internet keyboard warrior using technology and infrastructure thought-up, designed, and built by thousands or even millions of engineers over hundreds of years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1810 months ago

      I have exactly 1 trick to get away with letting out your righteous anger at executives: become such a visible figure in collective action that there is no way the company could ever fire you without it being illegal retaliation. The trick is to become that visible while having plausible deniability about organizing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1310 months ago

      You don’t engage in that kind of direct action without being fully aware of the consequences. An engineer at Google is not that idiotic

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Well, first of all, one doofus doesn’t mean they are all doofus. Secondly, that person is an ethicist, not an engineer, even though Futurism calls him both, they are distinct and this guy was always making it seem like he was more than he was. Thirdly, smart people can do idiotic things, but that didn’t make them idiotic, maybe if they are habitually doing idiotic things, then sure then they are idiotic, but one idiotic thing does not make an idiot, just like I’ve misspelling does not make someone not fluent.

          Even if this one ethicist was an engineer, that doesn’t mean all engineers are idiotic, that my friend would be idiotic to assert such a thing. I contend that, by and large, engineers are not idiotic. Does that mean they’re aren’t idiots? No, don’t be silly.

          Finally, I don’t think that this was idiotic, so…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1210 months ago

      They were probably trying to get the other engineers to follow their lead. It doesn’t seem like that happened.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I actually don’t understand their sentiment.

      This isn’t the only surveillance Google is enabling. You could MAYBE argue genocide but… let’s just say it isn’t just facebook that supports brutal regimes.

      I’ve worked for… questionable companies in the past. I still argue that you more or less can’t do Research without getting blood on your hands because… blood money spends well and experiments/development without a defined product is expensive.

      But… unless you are a complete moron, you understand that. Don’t get me wrong, there are a LOT of graduate students out there who never question WHY there are government grants and why their advisor is talking to Major Johnson and so forth (Val Kilmer’s Real Genius is probably the most accurate grad school movie ever made…). But you eventually figure it out. ESPECIALLY if you are working for a company and have to have a defined/target product. I know Google/Alphabet is notorious for the cutthroat/backstabbing among employees but you aren’t going to be isolated as to why you are working on a graph search algorithm or how to conceal a camera in a device.

      So I don’t know if this engineer was just ridiculously ignorant or if they were hoping to “go viral” or what. But you don’t wake up one day and realize you are the baddies. You more or less realize that your first day of work and spend time deciding if that will lead to alcoholism or activism.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        910 months ago

        I doubt it. Engineers don’t get to yell at executives at meetings.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          Please don’t disturb the overlords while they distribute kool-aid and tell you how good the kool-aid is good for you.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            Do you think you could get away with something like that at your job?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              In the US - no. In some European countries, totally. The fact I can work without being worried that I’m going to get fired because I’ve upset some MBA is great for my mental health.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                210 months ago

                I find it hard to believe that, even in Europe, standing up in the middle of a presentation and accusing your boss of being complicit in genocide, even if it’s true, would not be a fireable offense. Otherwise there would be a lot of yelling matches.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  210 months ago

                  You can get fired, but not “on the spot” and at worst, the employer has to pay your next month’s paycheck. That stands even if you were fired with good cause.

                  So here’s what would have happened, were this a Dutch company. Employee does the thing, employer says that they should leave, and they offer 1-2 months of a severance so the employee resigns on their own volition and the company avoids going to court. If the employee has more than 2 braincells, he gets a lawyer (there are good pro bono lawyers who work for free if you’re not well paid enough to get one). Lawyer advises asking for 6-8 months.

                  Company has two choices:

                  • Pay 6-8 months of severance.
                  • Drag the employee into labour court, which usually leans towards employees, and try to publicly argue about whether what they are doing is legal. Obviously it’s not going to about whether it’s about Google committing genocide or not, but obviously the media won’t care, and the words “Google” and “genocide” are going to be in the news in various combinations for a good year. All the while the company has to keep paying the employee, the most they can do is to order him to give back all equipment and prohibit him from contacting coworkers.
            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              Could I get away? It’s a gamble I guess. But I’ve raised my voice at meetings more than once in my life and never lost my job over it.

              To be fair, I’ve never worked in a big company like google, so they can replace you yesterday.

              But if you are at that point, you are ready to lose/switch jobs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5410 months ago

    “Earlier this week, an employee disrupted a coworker who was giving a presentation — interfering with an official company-sponsored event,” Google spokesperson Bailey Tomson says in an emailed statement. “This behavior is not okay, regardless of the issue, and the employee was terminated for violating our policies.”

    I guess they’ve gone from ‘disruptive’ to ‘disruption-averse’.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      World according to google.

      Abetting a genocide? A-OK.

      Speaking out against aiding a genocide? FORBIDDEN

      Wild how much “don’t be evil” Was holding them back, innit?