• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to mention military industrial complex and how disposable enlistees are in a war that they may have been the aggressors for, but are told they are being righteous. They make sure to show the casualties and maimings too.

          See Israel/Palestine and Russia/Ukraine for current context.

            • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Off the top of my head, a big one is that most of the people living in Buenos Aires, Argentina, are blond haired and blue eyed. Argentina, being a famous refuge for Nazis post-WWII. Almost like they won in the end.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The book of the same name by Robert Heinlein, which makes the case for a “just and fair” fascist state.

        Heinlein himself wasent a fascist, just a space cadet 60/70s scifi writer, but that is a theme of the book.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That isn’t the theme, and it wasn’t a fascist state in the novel. Or at least that wasn’t the intention, and we see no particularly damning evidence otherwise. Don’t get your literary interpretations from Reddit.

          That said, this is a pretty good write up on it.

          https://www.kirkusreviews.com/news-and-features/articles/robert-heinleins-starship-troopers-cold-war/

          What it ignores is that “Johnny” Rico is actually Juan Rico, a child of Filipino immigrants to Buenes Aires. Heinlein would often write his characters to be racially ambiguous until a reveal at the end. Not that big a deal today, but consider the impact on a reader from 1960.

          The “service guarantees citizenship” isn’t great, but it also is much better in the novel than the movie. The movie portrays it as control method for a military controlled society, in the novel “service” is public service.

          Social workers, teachers, librarians, civil servants of all types, doctors, nurses, all earned citizenship as well, it wasn’t a facade for a military junta. Not the best (fuck the state) but there was a program like modern Germany’s year of service for people that didn’t want to go into the military.

          The best way to consider Heinlein at the time was a liberal hawk. One scared of the R E D S and deeply concerned that losing the arms race would lead to the Soviets conquering the world.

          If you want to speculate on what Heinlein would have been if he was born German instead, or even what would happen if you cut his liberal skin, fair enough, but he was also an anti-racist who strongly believed in democracy and was a product of a world where the threats to that democracy were Hitler and Stalin.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah dude I read the book, but way to whip out “dont get your summation from reddit” to try to minimize someone’s critique of an old, and generally poor, scifi novel. A novel that did, very clearly, attempt to make a “justification” for a facist state. Was it a though experiment for Heinlein? You bet, but it still is what it is. His writing is what the movie is satirizing.

            I called Heinlein a space cadet, not a fascist. If I thought he was a fascist, I would have called him one. As to the “space cadet,” aint no one writing “stranger in a strange land” without walking on moonbeams first.

            • bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some people really need fascist states to be pinky promise not actually fascist. Or for fascist states to be good actually.

              It’s too bad stuff like starship troopers and helldivers brings em out, kinda sucks the fun out of laughing at rico and co.

    • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just curious, as someone who hasn’t looked up much about it, does Helldivers 2 have the satirical themes as Starship Troopers, too? Or is it just about fighting bugs in space?

        • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That summary and game trailer is beautiful and hilarious lol. It totally brings me back to Starship Troopers. I want to play it even more now lol.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah. And you need to lean it to it. Democracy and Freedom are practically deities in the game. You’ll hear young men and women shout about democracy while commiting interplanetary war crimes, and pleading for liberty to save them when one of their limbs get blown to hell.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Ελληνικά
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s excellent. Easily worth the 40 or so bucks. The community is pretty solid, although there are a lot of whiners who complain non-stop about how they can’t solo the hardest objectives on the toughest difficulty in a game designed around 4 person co-op. Honestly, the dev has been doing a great job of making all the tools viable and rewarding under the right circumstances. I find myself trying to equip for the mission and my team instead of just take “the best meta loadout”.

  • Lenny@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Starship Troopers is a good rewatch every few years. I don’t see myself ever having the desire to watch Napoleon again.

    • Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The directors cut might make it a decent movie though, just like with Kingdom of Heaven. Why they don’t just chop the movie into two parts but elect to bring out a turd followed by the complete movie a year later is anyone’s guess.

      • RamblingPanda
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m so sick of this. I’m not giving you money twice just because you feel like releasing a bad version first. In fact, I’m not giving you any money if you do that.