A New York appeals court on Monday agreed to hold off collection of former President Donald Trump’s $454 million civil fraud judgment — if he puts up $175 million within 10 days.

If he does, it will stop the clock on collection and prevent the state from seizing his assets while he appeals.

Delay. Delay. Delay.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1019 months ago

      It’s fucking ridiculous. Anyone else would be in prison by now. This guy just gets to run out the clock because everyone in the justice system is too afraid to look biased.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          399 months ago

          I thought this is the exact reason why we keep outfitting SWAT guys with army surplus gear? Isn’t that so we can defend the country against terrorists and other violent criminals? So all that is actually exclusively for murdering unarmed people and throwing flashbang grenades in infants’ cribs, got it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            109 months ago

            Powerful people who run the U.S. made shitty selfish decisions for decades and then are surprised the country caught an illness like Trump.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              Yeah, I agree. But saying that it happened over the course of decades kinda misses the scope of the problem by a bit.

              The ability to have powerful, unaccountable people, in or outside of government that is the problem. It’s allowing these hierarchies to exist in the first place that’s the problem, and is it not the same source of the problem we had with the divine right of kings?

        • ShieldGengar
          link
          fedilink
          119 months ago

          Well then they shouldn’t be judges; no one said the job was easy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          39 months ago

          So who does and does not have to follow the laws is decided by religious conservatives in the country? Under threat of personal harm?

          The US is a 3rd world country…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2139 months ago

    If he has $500/M on hand, this shouldn’t be allowed.

    If he DOESN’T have $500/M on hand… This still shouldn’t be allowed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      589 months ago

      I also predict he will COMPLAIN about this gift on truth social, saying they should have reduced it to Zero. Spitting right in the faces of those judges that just gave him the gift.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      Honestly, considering he stated on Truth Social that he had 500M on hand, which he was absolutely NOT going to pay his bond with, I would’ve denied his appeal on that alone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      429 months ago

      Yeah. NY will hold you without trial for three years on suspicion of stealing a backpack. But defraud the state of millions in taxes for years and there are zero consequences.

  • Savaran
    link
    fedilink
    1579 months ago

    Because why should self proclaimed billionaires face consequences for their actions and statements. /sigh

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    155
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Did the judge by any chance suddenly get $20 million richer?
    How is this not corruption? All lawyers I’ve heard, say you need to put down the full amount. Are they ALL wrong?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      589 months ago

      How is this not corruption?

      Its naked corruption. Everyone involved should be disbarred and be immediately investigated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      439 months ago

      This is NOT corruption and Mr. Trump did NOT BRIBE the judge as you are suggesting. The judge is honorable and just and made the announcement out of his own good graces. He even pushed back a flight on his new private jet for a trip he had planned for the christening of his new yacht JUST TO MAKE THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. You people are all just jealous and desperately looking to find some dirt where there clearly isn’t. SAD!

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      349 months ago

      It’s full amount to stop the state from beginning to seize assets yes, but his appeal can continue either way. I thought I read/heard that the appellate court did not have the power to do anything with judgements though, other than upheld/overturned. Now I have something to research.

      • qantravon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        409 months ago

        He’s still on the hook for the full amount if his appeal fails, he just no longer has to put it all up to start the appeal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          359 months ago

          Sure, but if he doesn’t put it up at the beginning, why does anyone think he’ll pay up if he loses? He’ll just keep delaying, as he’s done all along with all of these cases. And if he wins the election, it’ll all go away anyway, which is the “all in” gamble his while life is basically riding on.

            • themeatbridge
              link
              fedilink
              399 months ago

              And in the meantime, he can devalue and divest while building a political warchest. Deny, deflect, delay. He will not face consequences because there is no justice in America.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                209 months ago

                He will not face consequences because there is no justice in America.

                Trump will die outside of any prison or jailhouse, having never been locked up, likely without even an ankle bracelet, of natural causes, while living a 1% lifestyle. Mark my words.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  59 months ago

                  Honestly at this point, fuck it I just want the fucker dead. At least cholesterol doesn’t care about politics, go team cholesterol

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                39 months ago

                devalue and divest while building a political warchest

                What does that even mean? Don’t be a doomer. Every day he spends in court is less time and money spent on campaigning. Right now he has drained $50 million from Republican election funds to fight this, plus all the time and effort. That’s less time and money spent on supporting downballot Republicans.

                Even if he won every case (which won’t happen) this is a distraction for him. Biden hasn’t even started campaigning, and has a massive amount of funding. Trump will lose and every doomer will say “well of course he lost, he was in court half the time! Biden got lucky!”.

                • themeatbridge
                  link
                  fedilink
                  79 months ago

                  Devalue: assets have only theoretical value until they are sold. You can borrow against that theoretical value, but the more you borrow, the less equity you have. Separate from using it as collateral for a loan, the value of an asset can drop for a variety of reasons. Real Estate can fall to disrepair. Stocks can fall due to lowered expectations for the future. If you end up owing more than it’s worth, there’s little incentive not to allow the value to completely evaporate. You can also use the loss to offset capital gains elsewhere, but that’s not particularly relevant here.

                  Divest: means to sell off assets, with the indication that the sale is at a loss for quick sale. Rich people often engage in the sale of assets to friends, family, and associates who offer pennies on the dollar in exchange for favors. Hiding assets through divestitures is a common tactic for wealthy people who are about to owe a lot of money.

                  Engaging in both can be used to transfer funds from his personal holdings to his political campaign, which in turn is paying off his legal debts and can be returned to his own pockets after the election. So by increasing the warchest, he is more likely to win the election AND can make himself whole after it is over.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              Well, if he loses, the DA can seize assets. He doesn’t have to voluntarily pay up, lol.

              That’s what I was told about the appeal as well, yet here we are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          He’s still on the hook for the full amount if his appeal fails

          You know how long appeals can take right? Considering he can now get someone else to pay the relatively small bond, he’ll be dead from old age before he ever has to pay a dime of his own money.

          • qantravon
            link
            fedilink
            English
            89 months ago

            Believe me, I’m not saying this is a good thing. He’s definitely getting special treatment, and I think that’s wrong. However, it’s not quite as bad as it sounds.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      I agree with your sentiment. Just FYI the appeal was ruled on by a 5 judge panel, not just 1 judge.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes you are right, I didn’t see that at first. That does kind of change things a bit, still a bit weird IMO.

        From the article:

        Monday’s ruling came from a five-judge panel

        So maybe they had to split the 20 million?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Never in the history of mankind has conservatism been stopped by pacifism. The plague of conservatism can only be cured through action.

    Courts will not stop conservatives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      539 months ago

      He’s going to take every single Republican controlled state in the general. They’ll just announce that he won despite what the polls say and if it gets to SCOTUS they’ll pull another Bush v. Gore.

      RIP American democracy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      This is objectively and verifiably false. Recommend you cool your jets a smidgen, the darkest hour is just before the dawn.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You sound just like the articles early in Trump’s presidency, furiously hand waving away his fascist tendencies with similarly meaningless platitudes.

        If this is verifiably false, I’d love any verification you might provide.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Never in the history of mankind has conservatism been stopped by pacifism.

          • American Civil Rights Movement
          • Indian Independence from Britain
          • Singing Revolution in the Baltics
          • Arab Spring

          There are tons more examples but the point is that I only need one because your statement was so broadly inflammatory.

          I don’t disagree with your sentiment, but to claim that violence is the only way to make societal progress makes you seem intentionally obtuse.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            American Civil Rights Movement…

            MLK was murdered by conservatives. He tried peaceful resistance before admitting it was ineffective. Peaceful resistance famously did not work. It’s amazing to me that you would try to cite this notorious failure of peaceful resistance as some kind of success story. It honestly just comes off racist with today’s conservative rhetoric that racism no longer exists.

            Indian Independence from Britain…

            Again, Ghandi was murdered by conservatives. Indefinite detentions were enacted and countless Indians were tortured to death by conservatives. Peace did not work in gaining independence from Britain. Unending mass-resistance that caused the deaths of many innocent Indians led to it just not being worth it for Britain.

            Singing Revolution in the Baltics…

            Only Estonia earned independence through peaceful protest. And that was due to a great deal of support by western nations, and a lack of trying to stop it by the Soviets. Estonia was not being actively oppressed, they just wanted independence. But when Latvia and Lithuania tried the same approach, violence WAS necessary in the form of riots, and deadly barricades. Numerous unarmed citizens of both countries were killed in violent resistance that eventually led to agreements for their independence. And again, the Soviets were barely motivated to stop it. Active conservative oppression was not a motivating factor here for these countries. Simple independence to pursue their own prosperity was the goal.

            Arab Spring…

            Really? Really?! This is an absurdity on its face. Innocent people are being oppressed by conservatives in the middle east in record numbers today and no one on earth thinks any differently. Why would you even try this one? The brief victories earned during the Arab Spring were earned through well-documented bloodshed and violent resistance.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    128
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    so if you defraud enough the government will bend over backwards to let you keep your ill-gotten gains. awesome.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      299 months ago

      If you owe the bank $100 you have a problem. If you owe the bank $100k, the bank has a problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        149 months ago

        This statement is way out of date due to inflation.

        Probably on the order of tens of millions before the bank has a problem. Billions, if it’s one of the bigger banks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1249 months ago

    ONCE AGAIN, Donald Trump is treated with the kid gloves by the courts. Inconceivable. On the day the judgement was to be collected, Trump gets an absolute boon from the heavens above with a 10 day extension and a bond requirement of less than half of the original sum? For what reason? Trump defrauded the American people. He does not deserve special treatment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      149 months ago

      Well, he did say that there is a two tiered justice system. Here is the proof that there is. I challenge any MAGA believer to attempt HALF what this guy has done and see if they get the same treatment as him. Go on, I’ll wait

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      It feels like a TV show where the villain somehow keeps getting away because if they caught them the show would be over.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      569 months ago

      Yeah I have no idea how I fell for the same, “Trump is in real trouble this time” article that journalists have been pumping out for the last 6 years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          He led an insurrection on the capitol building almost half a decade ago and he’s still walking free and running for president. Do you think he has seen any meaningful consequences, or does money make the world go round?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            I’m not saying he didn’t, that it doesn’t, or that he has. It’s just that the whole reason were talking about this is cause he over-inflated the value of his assets and nobody wants to loan him money. Technically, if he had money to pay for this, he wouldn’t be in this predicament. He wouldn’t be begging people to put it on credit. Any reasonable rich person would just pay the damn thing and get it out of the way. Then again he’s not reasonable… but I digress.

            I’m sure this was just a “legit” way to get the amount lowered / pander to his base / kiss his ass. It sucks that nobody has the gumption to give him the consequences he deserves, but I don’t care if he says “he has the money,” or had the money in the past to get to the presidency and get everyone on board with his demented plot of world domination. If he doesn’t pay it, he ain’t got it. There’s a reason nobody with actual money would loan it to him.

            Yes, greed rules the world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      It took me a minute to realize how fuckimg perfect this picture is.

      Also: me trying to write fucking with swipes: Ducking chucking docking fixing cycling duckling… Apple really doesn’t want me to type it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1059 months ago

    5 days ago I was downvoted for saying this would happen. Yet here we are.

    Expect this judgement to get appealed and tossed completely. They can’t do it all in one go as that’s too obvious. Doing a slow roll. Randomly extending the deadline and slashing the bond amount is just the first step. Expect more. Each time easing up even more on Trump.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      499 months ago

      We’re all just clinging on to the last sheds of hope in order to not fall into the endless pit of despair.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        I don’t really have any faith in the court system anymore. Why should anyone? They control neither the purse nor the sword, and yet unqualified political stooges can dictate policy.

        Imagine if we did the same for engineers or doctors. “Hey, my completely unqualified buddy gets to design a bridge, and if it falls down and kills people it is their fault!” It’s ridiculous.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      There’s no reason to toss the judgement and the appeals court is a NY State Court. Every single judge has been appointed by a Democratic Governor.

      The Court of Appeals consists of seven judges: the Chief Judge and six associate judges who are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the state senate to 14-year terms

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Court_of_Appeals

      There are no legal problems with the case against Trump, and his lying about property values is well documented. They are definitely not going to vacate the judgement.

      Your doomer comment makes no sense. This dude is currently fucked. He has to pay $175 million in 10 days, and the rest when the appeals court boots the case. This is clearly bad for him. He should get it over with (if he can), stay out of court, and campaign for president. There’s so many court cases coming that he will have to cancel his rallies, because of time and money constraints.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        309 months ago

        Your doomer comment makes no sense. This dude is currently fucked. He has to pay $175 million in 10 days

        He was supposed to have had to pay ~$500 million today, yet a judge appointed by a Democratic Governor gave him special treatment yet again.

        Frankly, your unfounded optimism makes no sense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          39 months ago

          He still has to pay the whole judgment. This is just the bond ahead of the appeal.

          I believe the law was changed recently to prevent people from appealing and delaying the judgment. So a few years ago, he wouldn’t have had to pay anything right now.

          There’s no way property would have been seized and sold by the end of today anyway. So getting $175 million in cash now and $280 million in property in a month is almost the same.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            59 months ago

            Not particularly, because reducing the appeals bond means that Trump can delay the trial even longer - which is the plan. Pretty much everyone sees that his plan from the beginning has been to push back and delay as long as possible, preferably until he’s either confirmed as the Republican nominee (in which case he can beat the wardrum of “oh this is a political witch hunt, you can’t sue a major political candidate”) or, more preferably, he wins the election, in which case I’m sure the DOJ will move double-quick to find a way for him to not have to pay a cent to anyone.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                They’re not supposed to answer to the DOJ.

                Seems that whenever Trump is involved, a lot of things that aren’t supposed to happen keep happening.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        219 months ago

        He has to pay $175M in 10 days. For now. That could get extended. Or reduced. Or both. No reason to assume he’ll be held to that now. All evidence points to it being reduced or extended again.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          What evidence? The judges on the NY State Court of Appeals are all appointed by Democrats. More than that, he personally insults judges, making him not a sympathetic defendant to them.

          They are tolerating him so that he has no avenues for appeal to the NY State Supreme Court. That’s exactly what Judge Engoron did in this case. Stop being a doomer and take the win.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            229 months ago

            The fact that they already gave him an extension and a reduction once, just now. How can you be in this thread, yet not paying attention? They are literally at this moment giving him exactly the special treatment you claim there’s “no evidence” for!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              49 months ago

              Are you not paying attention? I just said they are tolerating him so he has no legal avenues for the judgment to be reduced or appealed. Like it or not, this is what you have to do with clients who have lots of money for lawyers.

              He’s not getting away with anything. These judges are making sure he’s 100% fucked. If you don’t understand this principle, just say so. Have you ever followed a court case with a wealthy defendant?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                79 months ago

                so he has no legal avenues for the judgment to be reduced or appealed

                you just plain do not understand what is happening. They are helping him to appeal, the bond amount is part of the appealing process, its collateral put away until the appeal is over and the judgment enforced. This was an appeals court.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                they are tolerating him so he has no legal avenues for the judgment to be reduced or appealed.

                Of course! If the judges reduce it now then Trump can’t get it reduced later! Just keep reducing it down and there will be nothing for Trump to appeal, brilliant!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            What evidence?

            The fact that is was cut 60% just because Donald said he wasn’t going to pay

            They are tolerating him so that he has no avenues for appeal

            This is literally the opposite… they are bending over backwards to give him a better chance to appeal

            Stop being a doomer and take the win.

            Where is the win?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              The judgement was not reduced. The amount of the bond he has to post ahead of time is reduced, and it’s still $175 million!

              Better chance to appeal? He can appeal whether or not he posts the bond. Read about the case more.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                69 months ago

                I never said it was the judgement, I knew it was the bond but the point remains… Why does he get a break?

                Also, he needs to post the bond to appeal, that’s the whole issue here… They are giving him a 60% discount to make it easier for him to appeal… Maybe take your own advice and read about the case more

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                59 months ago

                How about this. The fact the appeals court didn’t even give a reason for the decision. So can the next person that wants to appeal cite this? Not really because there’s no reason to cite. The piss judges couldn’t even be bothered to release their rationale.

  • Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    879 months ago

    Ugh. Yet more special treatment. I mean, I’m disappointed but not suprised.