@flaviat - Lemmy NSFW

flaviat@awful.systems

0 Posts
4 Comments

Joined 3 months ago

Cake day: February 14th, 2025

You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.

OverviewCommentsPosts

flaviat@awful.systemstoTechTakes@awful.systems•Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 27th April 2025
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
6·
edit-2
10 days ago
Now I’m wondering if an infinite sequence of nested LLMs could achieve AGI. Probably not.

link
fedilink

flaviat@awful.systemstoTechTakes@awful.systems•Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 6th April 2025
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
7·
1 month ago
So “unintentional moderates” are those that both choose deliberately to believe in centrist political ideology and to participate in groupthink?

link
fedilink

flaviat@awful.systemstoTechTakes@awful.systems•Gemini 2.5 "reasoning", no real improvement on river crossings.
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
1 month ago
deleted by creator

link
fedilink

flaviat@awful.systemstoSneerClub@awful.systems•Vaccinations in Book/Article Form, Part II
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
5·
2 months ago
The Wikibooks book on statistics is surprisingly decent. Hopefully it inspires the reader to acknowledge that there are a lot more things to study apart from Bayes.

link
fedilink

flaviat@awful.systemstoTechTakes@awful.systems•Credulous coverage of AI slop on Wikipedia
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
7·
2 months ago

So perhaps one alternative way to estimate their quality is to check the number of citations, many have more than 100 citations, which is a sign of quality

Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed

link
fedilink