• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, the point is that there is a correlation between eating processed foods and developing “incident depression” over a 15 year period in mostly white populations of middle-aged women.

    The study doesn’t say what you’re already claiming it does because of a headline, and that is what leads to very unhealthy advice given.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      The negative mood effects of unhealthy lifestyle choices are well established and not arguable. I’m not making that statement on this study, but rather the entire body of literature showing this to be the case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The point is that that ultra-processed or unhealthy foods increase the risk for depression in the general public.

        This is you, making a false statement that is about the study OP posted, not general “not arguable” bodies of knowledge.

        This is harmful, not helpful.

        Edit: for those downvoting me, the quote from the person before me is NOT based on decades of non arguable research. It is only based on their opinions, biases, and the headline OP posted.

        The study we are discussing opening paragraph says the following:

        Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

        Unless this random internet person knows more than these researchers, then I’d say that this person is doing the exact harmful thing I was trying to prevent.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Ok, I’ll say it again. The negative mood effects of unhealthy lifestyle choices are well established and not arguable. I’m not making that statement on this study, but rather the entire body of literature showing this to be the case. Sorry there was a misunderstanding.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            Then go edit your post to remove the statement that contradicts what you’re saying now.

            What I am trying to do is to prevent people from reading the headline and making the false statement that you then made based off of it and using that to try and give advice about diet and exercise to people with clinical depression.

            • XbSuper
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              You need to work on your reading comprehension. They clearly state that the claim they’re making is based of decades of research, not simply this headline.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The statement they made, which I quoted, IS NOT BASED ON DECADES OF RESEARCH! It is based on their assumptions and the headline in this article.

                The study we are talking about makes it very clear in its first paragraph that there has been little-to-no prior research on the effects of processed foods and depression.

                Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

                It is literally the justification for this specific study having been done at all.

                This study only involved middle-aged white women (95% of participants) who didn’t suffer from depression at the start of the study. It measured incident depression over the course of 15 years and correlated that with various processed food categories.

                That person making the statement that processed foods increase the chance of depression in the general public is doing exactly what I was trying to get people to not do, which is turn this headline into false assumptions and unhelpful advice about general depression.

                I hate these reddit moments.

                • XbSuper
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Jesus Christ dude. Read what they said, they are a medical professional, they are not making claims based on an article, but rather years of research.

                  This has nothing to do with reddit, you’re just a moron.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    They said this:

                    The point is that that ultra-processed or unhealthy foods increase the risk for depression in the general public.

                    The study we are talking about literally says this:

                    Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

                    We are talking about a study that in its opening paragraph, with sources, contradicts what they, as a random internet stranger claiming to be a medical professional, are claiming as the truth.

                    I, for one, am going to side with the study over the person making claims with no evidence. Even a study that I think will cause people like you and the other person to act in foolish, unscientific, and very harmful ways.

                    Anyway, you should go back to reddit with that attitude. Or downvote and move on. You added nothing of value here and were a jerk for absolutely no reason.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            They’re established to be linked to incidental depression, not clinical. It may help SOME people get out of a tailspin, but those with clinical/chronic depression will not experience the benefits of ‘healthier lifestyle choices’.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Yes. This is not a cure all, but will indeed reduce (but not purge) situational depression among the populace. I did not disagree with you, I added nuance; no need to repeat your statement.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you’re not talking about the study, why did you quote the headline almost word for word?