• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      That doesn’t make a murder/suicide a “mass shooting”. I’m sorry apporoaching this rationally has you so upset

      Thanks, I love this reply. It’s only two sentences, but its so fantastically revealing.

      The first sentences calls your very own example a “murder/suicide”, a term which is unquestionably more misleading than “mass shooting”. The “murder” isn’t even plural, despite there being 4 of them.

      If you gathered up a million people, told half of them it was a murder/suicide and half of them it was a mass shooting, then asked them to guess the number of people killed, the latter would easily be closer to the truth.

      The second sentence just makes it clear you’re a fuckstain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          This isn’t high school debate class. Ad hominem means you’re not inherently wrong just because you’re a fuckwit. You can still be wrong and you can still be a fuckwit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              They’re a lost cause too because before I called you a fuckwit, I pointed out that you were only interested in being misleading in your favor, not actually stopping people from being mislead.

              You took “ad hominem” as an easy out and as an added bonus, you were misleading about what ad hominem means.