• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I still don’t get why rural voters latched onto a clearly narcissistic big city property developer who lies constantly and treat rural people like shit as a response to big city politicians who rural voters think lie constantly and treat rural people like shit.

    Just because he said words they wanted to hear? Politicians do that all the time! How is he the one they believe?

    All the points in the article are accurate, but it just doesn’t make sense that the personification of everything they hate about cities is who they end up worshipping.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4810 months ago

        Except he didn’t fight for them and he lied constantly about fighting for them with no results.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          2310 months ago

          And dementedly burning down everything one sees and grabbing pussies doesn’t make one “a fighter” - just a narcissistic asshole criminal.

          Hooray what a hero.

          Even if I grant all the arguments are true for the sake of discussion, the fact that they’ve seen how incompetent and ridiculously stupid he is for FOUR YEARS not to mention he tried to destroy their fucking government and they’re all “yay we upset city people” Okay Granpa Jones but that makes you objectively a complete fucking asshole moron and your continued support of this rapist fraud criminal is not helping you in any way at any level. Try again. Got someone smart? Articulate? Anyone? We’re open - any age, any gender, any race - anyone? No? This guy huh. He’s your guy is he. Yeah.

          That’s what we thought.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1010 months ago

            But they didn’t see who he was. Their news media fed them a different story about liberals getting in his way and the immigrants making things worse and the government not letting him fix things. It’s all the “lazy” city people voting for big government handouts that’s making the world worse.

            Anything he’'s accused of is just liberal politics and a hoax.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            And dementedly burning down everything one sees and grabbing pussies doesn’t make one “a fighter”

            Yeah it does.

            Like, by definition. He fights.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          910 months ago

          It’s not about facts though. They didn’t logically choose to support him based on facts, figures, and results. It’s all feelings.

      • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
        link
        English
        3010 months ago

        It’s a good explanation. And it confirms the core nihilism motivating these voters. “Burn it all down” is an abdication of responsibility and self-infantilizing by forcing that responsibility on everyone else.

        Their frustration and motivation, while I can understand it, is an insult to those of us continuing to keep it together as they make everything worse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          “Burn it all down” is an abdication of responsibility and self-infantilizing by forcing that responsibility on everyone else.

          Left wing doomers and “revolutionaries”: sweats profusely

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If only there was a group of people who told us neoliberalism and NAFTA would be disastrous!

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Seattle_WTO_protests

        Since NAFTA, Americans have watched the economy grow, but its stability plummet.

        https://depts.washington.edu/wtohist/testimonies/comesatime.htm

        Interesting reflection in today’s world where we keep getting told that the current administration has done great for the economy, and yet the wealth devide keeps growing, and more and more people are living paycheck to paycheck.

        There’s an also an interesting linguistic difference that is very noticeable between this movement and today’s repercussions of the inaction that followed. While in English we often speak of “anti-globalization” in French they say “alter-mondialisation”. A different globalization instead of against globalization. The French term much better described the left wing movement of the time, while the media only spoke of anti-globalization which now became a calling cry of the right.

        Fun fact, a Twitter was originally conceptualized as a result of the 1999 protests^1 due to the difficulties and successes people on the streets had with coordinating via SMS (which at the time was rather new and novel).


        Anyhow, I guess we should all vote for the neoliberal again, surely that will fix it!

        [1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3485447.3512282

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5210 months ago

      I still don’t get why rural voters latched onto a clearly narcissistic big city property developer who lies constantly and treat rural people like shit as a response to big city politicians who rural voters think lie constantly and treat rural people like shit.

      Because he gave their bigotry a voice.

          • Hemingways_Shotgun
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1510 months ago

            Occam’s Razor is a philosophical thought experiment, nothing more.

            That’s why the important part of the phrase (that people tend to ignore) is “…all things being equal”.

            It means “if these multiple answers/solutions were to exist in a vacuum, and context was of no importance, the simplest answer/solution is probably the right one.”

            Here in the real, non philosophical world, absolutely nothing exists in a vacuum. Context always plays a role no matter how innocuous or silly the decision might be.

            At it’s simplest, I can say “Do I want to eat an Apple or an Orange right now.”

            Occam’s razor tells me that the Apple is closer, so that’s what I should eat.

            But WHY is the apple closer? Did someone take it out of the fridge and leave it, so now it’s spoiled?

            Is it in a fruit bowl that happens to be out of oranges? That means someone might have eaten the last one, so getting up and going to the fridge to retrieve and orange could lead to disappointment and wasted time.

            etc… etc…

            Nothing is simple. Anyone who says it is is trying to sell you something.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Are you firm on the stance that it’s only bigotry, and not, like, I dunno, motions wildly to the article a complex set of multidimensional issues?

            What’s the logical fallacy called when you misuse a logical fallacy?

            E: “fallacy fallacy” or “argument from fallacy” (also known as: disproof by fallacy, argument to logic, fallacy fallacy, fallacist’s fallacy, bad reasons fallacy [form of])

            Description: Concluding that the truth value of an argument is false based on the fact that the argument contains a fallacy.

            Good philosophy.stackexchange discussion about it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Hey, if you want to believe it’s just simple noble country folk that support Trump and not a bunch of fucking bigoted shitheels, that’s your benefit of the doubt to give.

              If you want to convince me, you’ll need to do better than an op-ed in Store Brand Mad Magazine from someone who is airing his grievances that New Orleans got too much attention after Hurricane Katrina.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Are most of the people who voted for Trump bigoted shitheels? Possibly. Is everyone who voted for Trump in 2016 a bigoted worthless life? Absolutely not. Not even close. He campaigned on a multitude of issues, if you’ll recall. And before that thought enters your head, no, I voted for Sanders in 16 and Biden in 20.

                I know it helps to simplify things, but you can do better. Think outside of the Monkeysphere, or whatever you need to call it so you don’t feel like you got the idea from Store Brand Mad Magazine.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Is everyone who voted for Trump in 2016 a bigoted worthless life?

                  Perhaps not, but January 6 left no doubt about the supporters who remained with him.

                  Lemmy: where everyone to the left of Biden must be a Russian Chinese Shill bot child, but let’s give actual Trumpists the benefit of the doubt.

                  • @[email protected]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    210 months ago

                    Perhaps not, but January 6 left no doubt about the supporters who remained with him.

                    I’m not sure about your associates, but about 1/8th of the people I know voted for Trump now claim to have not done so. They have so much shame and regret over it that they lie about ever doing it. Post-2019, most who were big Trump supporters aren’t anymore. There are still a couple doucheknuckles who have firmly twisted themselves inside the asshole of the propaganda well, but they are the loud few.

                    For this at least, we can be thankful.

                    Lemmy: where everyone to the left of Biden must be a Russian Chinese Shill bot child, but let’s give actual Trumpists the benefit of the doubt.

                    You and I have very different Lemmy subscriptions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2510 months ago

      I read that rural voters often feel like the government isn’t for them, they feel disempowered. And in response, they seek to undermine and break the system that disempowers them. They do not look to improve or change the system, they want to destroy it. So when people yell at them for threatening democracy by voting for a lunatic with dictator fantasies, they feel empowered.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1610 months ago

        I get that for voting, but not for how they gush and fawn over his rambling nonsense like he is the second coming.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          They are not mutually exclusive. They idolize Trump, in part, because he is the middle finger to everyone who has made a mockery of their existence.

          To them he’s not a man, he is a symbol.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Because rural voters are stupid, because Republicans have spent the last 30+ years destroying public education, especially in rural and minority heavy areas.

      This isn’t an insult, its a fact.

      When you’re uneducated and have little experience of the outside world… well, youre extremely easy to convince with rhetoric over actual policy results.

      Then combine that with the massively super effective Republican media machine (Rush Limbaugh, Bill O Reilly, Sean Hannity, Ben Shapiro, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones) which reinforces the religion + culture + politics of the rural Republican areas, and there ya go.

      I dunno, it seems obvious to me, but thats probably because I was raised by a ditto-head (Rush Limbaugh’s term for his followers) who later became a Q Anon, illegal-firearm-manufacturing-in-his-garage wacko, in a poor, technically suburban but realistically rural area.

      Why latch on to Trump in particular?

      Because he made it ok for them to mask off and hate all the things they hate but have been lying about hating for decades.

      Its a kind of catharsis for them, that manifests in collective hatred of inferior enemy groups.

      You know, standard fascist shit?

      It doesnt matter that Trump himself is the antithesis of what an idealized Republican person would be. What matters is he lets them feel comfortable expressing themselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2110 months ago

      Who they worship doesn’t matter. Based on the article, they voted for a brick to be thrown into the window of the elites. It really doesn’t matter who that person is, just as long as they inflict damage on the elites who have been marginalizing them for years.

      It was a super informative article and I hope people read it, and not assume from the title or read the summarized version like we usually do.

      If we keep labelling them ‘deplorables’, it’ll make things worse. We need to reach out and listen while also helping as best we can.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think it’s partly his ‘strong man’ persona, but also that he was one of the only candidates hitting on all the things they needed to hear. We need to do more for our rural communities. Help the farmers! Help the coal miners! Keep oil production flowing! He touched on the lifeblood on these rural towns, which is something other conservative politicians weren’t doing as much. That let his message spread wider organically, from people who were quite literally willing to devote their life to him. He ‘stuck to his guns’ (on the issues they cared about anyway) which is what let them ignore the other things he said and did. There was also one of the largest state-sponsored propaganda campaigns in Internet history backing his election. In many or most small towns it became an Us vs. Them (Trump being the Us) and if you know how small towns work then you know it’s “When in Rome…” creating a massive echo chamber across conservative America. When the mob is rallying for something, you stay quiet or face the consequences. Many didn’t stay quiet and became outspoken, which furthered the division.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        He said those things and did nothing for rural areas. Why are they still in love with him?

        I knownthe answer is Fox News and repetition, but how do they not see through the obvious facade?

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          410 months ago

          You said it yourself. Propaganda works.

          It’s probably not a coincidence that the essay anchors on fictional movies as a foundation.

          We really should have understood television while it was the only thing out there. We deliberately did not. (Well, there were nevery any tv shows about it. With the possible exception of TV Nation)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      I still don’t get why rural voters latched onto a clearly narcissistic big city property developer who lies constantly and treat rural people like shit

      I’ll go with the easy answer/low hanging fruit: he said the same racist and xenophobic shit they think instead of trying to couch it politically correct speech (which is one of the most ironic things I think I’ve ever said). The perfect encapsulation of this is a well known Lee Atwater quote:

      You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*****, N*****, N*****.” By 1968 you can’t say “N*****”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N*****, N*****.”

      Unfortunately, republican mindsets haven’t changed in the last 60 years, so we’re still dealing with the same bullshit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        It’s tempting to just boil it down to racism and call it a day, but it’s far more complicated than that.

        To quote the article:

        The rural folk with the Trump signs in their yards say their way of life is dying, and you smirk and say what they really mean is that blacks and gays are finally getting equal rights and they hate it. But I’m telling you, they say their way of life is dying because their way of life is dying. It’s not their imagination.