• Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    I know little about the game industry. I saw one person say it’s because of the high interest rates. Games cost so much to produce, they have to borrow most of it and the rates have screwed them.

    No idea if thats true.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        I think you need to look at most companies. They are heavily in debt. So the profits just Ktlo and keep the payment paid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      The problem is capitalism, in general. But more specifically, it’s the current era of capitalism where line must always go up. Growth must be infinite.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        Well under communism you wouldn’t have games or at least nothing like we have today. So I’ll take the capitalist approach. The idea of starving just doesn’t appeal to me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          Horseshit.

          You’re saying this in a thread about a game that is literally free and has been the passion project of two brothers for nearly 20 years.

          You might not see games like GTA or CoD. Might not. But even that’s still possible.

          • Neuromancer
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            In twenty years they produced about a million in income. The budget for call of duty was 250 million dollars. Apples and oranges.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              under communism you wouldn’t have games or at least nothing like we have today.

              My brother in Christ, I was refuting your point.

              • Neuromancer
                link
                fedilink
                18 months ago

                So we’d have some half ass game that took twenty years to produce? Well comrade, that refutes everything I said.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Just as one entertaining example, here in ontario the government sells weed, but at black market prices, and then when they couldn’t sell what they had, they let it sit so long it had to be destroyed rather than simply lowering the price. So, we’re 1. not interfering with the black market, 2. no longer accounting for supply and demand through price adjustment… and there’s no real reason why but pride. People are proud when the cost of the item they produce goes up, enjoy the income, and forget that it works the other way too. Flooding the market with cheap, good shit is considered shitting the bed, so to speak. Pandering twats…

        It used to be called collusion, but hey, usury used to be 3%. /shrug

        /end drug addict rant