• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 hours ago

    I’m surprised to see this comment and the amount of upvotes.

    Doesn’t this break the PC bubble, where every person who works a mediocre job is a good person and no matter how disgusting the company is, you should never take your frustration out on them, yada yada yada.

    But if it’s an insurance company it’s okay to commit violence?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yup, thats it. People are literally saying that its okay to commit violence against anyone who works for any kind of insurance company. Even the cleaners of a home insurance firm.

      Well done you for understanding the situation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 hours ago

      I have no idea what you’re talking about. I don’t think anyone has advocated violence here, have they? That’s certainly not in my comment.

    • Zement
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Eeeeehhh… depends on negative individual impact on society and personal gain? I think the barely surviving insurance Employee should never be the target, what are you implying here? Have the insurance office shootings already taken over the school shootings? What meta level of could should have we reached to Dodge the ban?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 hours ago

      Different people

      I believe a revolution that is gained through blood is doomed to become oppressive

      Look at China for instance

      Other people disagree and feel change cannot happen without violence

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 hours ago

          France had a pretty rough go of things before Napoleon was elected

          Then had another rough go of things until Napoleon III died and they abolished the monarchy