• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      887 months ago

      Funny, just yesterday probably I was arguing with someone in another thread that was saying the people here don’t actually think Boeing had these whistleblowers killed, it was just making “implications and jokes.”

      And here, very clearly, with a massive number of upvotes we have someone claiming that Boeing had them killed and that resulted in brave souls coming out afterward. lol

      However, this also exposes another huge complaint I have with your typical lemmy-er (lemming? lemmite? what do you call a user of lemmy?): Almost no one reads the fucking article.

      This isn’t about new whistleblowers coming out, but their lawyer claiming he is afraid that current whistle blowers will be “scared away.”

      But, of course, what I’ve learned on reddit and even more so on lemmy is that the facts don’t matter, only the narrative.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Almost no one reads the fucking article.

        You are describing the human species. Through its entire history.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 months ago

          Agreed. Although I will say… While people not reading the articles was extremely common on reddit… Sadly, I feel like Lemmy is even worse about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            47 months ago

            When I first started on reddit many years ago, while it was clear some people didn’t read the article, usually the top comment in the thread usually showed that they read the article, unless it was some kind joke. Over time it definitely got worse.

            I was hoping when jumping to Lemmy that I would be able to recapture some of that magic.

            Lemmy has a lot of good things going for it, but what I got in that regard is the top comment, with 100% upvotes, clearly not having read the article and spewing some unsubstantiated conspiratorial claims. It’s like being in r/conspiracy sometimes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Yeah if you think we don’t do our due deligence, you should go to more right leaning social media, it’s all sound bites and knee jerk reactions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yes, varying people have different opinions on subjects. It is easy to think a comment with upvotes is the way the hivemind goes, but the hivemind has multiple factions.

        I, personally, have no opinion on the matter. The dude was septic and had a stroke. While it seems unlikely that was murder, I guess it is possible if you have infinite resources to make it look natural. But that is one HELL of a coincidence to have two whistle-blowers die . … like. … pretty fucking insane. Watch these next ten all die and no one important bats an eye.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      497 months ago

      Yes but our current society vests power in the corporation doing the killing. It’s a problem as old as civilization, but one we still haven’t solved. The problem is that these institutions and the technology they wield has never been greater.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        317 months ago

        We need an impartial lawnmower. Something external to the species that comes in and cuts the biggest ones in half. And it needs to be incorruptible and powerful enough to do this.

        Damn, I think I just invented god again.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Yep… Times will change and eventually the faceless bureaucracy world we have now will morph into something more like Roman imperial military dictatorship or European absolutist monarchies. I only hope we can organically build social mitigations to the centralising power of information technology before that happens. Because as bad as it is now it would be much worse then

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            197 months ago

            Well isn’t there a ruling in aircraft design and safety, that you calculate the probability of a certain failure and judge by its reoccurence if it was just random, or more than likely systematic?

            I think i read this in context to the two MAX planes crashing in the exact same way. The first one was ruled as maybe just being some very very freak thing to happen, but it happening twice made it entirely implausible to be without systematic cause.

            And well now it is happening twice in a few years with Boeing that weird things happen twice in a row with little time in between in relation to critical security flaws.

              • @[email protected]B
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

                years

                Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

                I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                I agree, that we cannot rule either death to be an assassination by itself. But their distinct occurrence in this context, e.g. that they prevent whistleblowers from testifying warrants an in depth investigation into both of them. In particular given the circumstances it is sketchy if Police or other officials are eager to close the case and rule it as non assassinations, without actually analyzing what was going on.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              37 months ago

              I don’t know if that’s a rule of thumb or not, but it certainly makes sense.

              First, the world of reliability runs on data and math. Lots of statistics, of course.

              And second, aircraft are over-engineered for safety margins on top of safety margins. The test data might say you need a part that’s X thickness of aluminum in order to be 99% sure to never fail in the field. So let’s just make it 3X thickness to be safe!

              So from that standpoint, back to back failures should pretty much always draw a bunch of attention in this industry.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            57 months ago

            I did do the math on it and the second guy only had a 1 in 3630 chance of dying of natural causes in that time window.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          97 months ago

          Yes. What you are listing are coincidences.

          Also understand that it is pretty rare for a whistleblower to have any future in the industry they are blowing the whistle on. That is throwing away years of schooling and often decades of experience. People tend to not do that if they aren’t already ill and not expecting a long life.

          As for “if I die, it is not suicide”: Gonna get real dark for a moment. A lot of people are just looking for a way to make their life, or death, matter. Someone realizing they don’t want to put themselves and their family through a very long trial might very well use that as an excuse to take the easy way out.

          All that said: Obviously these need to be investigated. But there is a big difference between investigating a suspicious death and immediately jumping to conspiracy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              And suicide rates go up drastically when people are overly stressed and think they have no future. Sort of like… having contributed to incredibly dangerous air travel and burning bridges with an entire industry.

              Similarly, like I said, a lot of whistleblowers are ill to begin with. Because, again, it is throwing away your future in an industry. It is a lot easier to consider that when your future on this planet is measured in years or even months.

              A LOT of documentaries/youtubes/whatever love to point out “the big evil company is ruining this man’s life when he is just trying to get his chemotherapy so that he can have a few more months with his family”. Which is indeed horrible (and why any good lawyer gets the testimony on record ASAP because people ARE pushed to suicide). But also kind of ignores that said company didn’t give them cancer… Unless we are having a repeat of the COVID conspiracy theories too.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                You don’t compare the stats to the population in its entirety

                You do for disease and suicide as it can happen to literally anyone.

                If working for a specific company or being a whistleblower affects those statistics, the company should be held responsible anyway.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            How is your take also not a conspiracy theory? You just pinned it on the little guy instead of a megacorp

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          There’s 2 kinds of evidence.

          • Circumstantial evidence - relies on an inference to connect it to the conclusion (e.g. guy saying before hand he won’t kill himself).
          • Direct evidence - no additional inference/evidence is needed (e.g. video of a guy going up to the car and shooting him).

          The guy saying he won’t kill himself requires inferring that he’s being truthful when he said it and that he didn’t change his mind. It’s not non-evidence, it does point to suicide being less likely. But it’s far from conclusive. If there’s no sign of entering the vehicle or that a struggle occurred, then I’d argue that far outweighs his prior statement.

          They just happened to work at the same company and die right before they could testify on the same thing.

          That’s also a common misunderstanding, at least regarding the first (I’m not as familiar with the second). I’m a bit unclear on the details of the deposition - which side wanted it and was asking the questions, etc. (detailed here) but whatever the case, it was Boeing that demanded he come back for one more day. So if Boeing wanted him to not testify that day, they’d just send him home as originally planned. The only reason they’d do it then was to silence him generally…but doing it in a way that draws so much suspicion to them seems like an implausibly bad decision. Then again, it is Boeing. (Note that this is also circumstantial evidence, and requires assuming that Boeing isn’t so dumb as to kill a witness in the middle of their own deposition, which may not be warranted).

          Edit: corrected my own misunderstanding of deposition

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            Its also inferring his friend is being truthful when he said that’s what the guy said.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            there’s no sign of entering the vehicle

            Hey.

            Yeah?

            See this gun?

            I do.

            Kill yourself with it or I will kill everyone in your family. Here is a list of their names and addresses.

            What if I kill you instead?

            Guys who sent me will send someone else.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 months ago

          That guy also had a history of mental issues and anxiety. He was away from home experiencing high stress environments, like a court room, and he was looking at another court appearance that day.

          It doesn’t take a genius to see that maybe, just maybe, this is a coincidence instead of murder. He had already given the bulk of his testimony, so I really don’t see the motive here.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Can I have source plz

          I’m not doubting you it’s just that’s so comedic I need to see it for myself

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There is plenty of evidence of foul play you smartass. They willingly risked lives over many years and are still currently flying many planes with defective unsafe parts. Going from that to assasination is not a big leap.

        Multiple of the whistleblowers and their colleagues have also independently said that their workplace was directly and deliberately sabotaged in order to continue using defective parts.

        Yes the last one doesnt really look like a typical assasination but it doesnt matter in the slightest if it was or not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          197 months ago

          Well…the first dude did say something about Boeing killing whistleblowers and the bravery of others to step up in defiance of that.

          So that whole line of thinking is conspiracy theory stuff with no real proof and it is being parroted here. Granted, usually the assassination stuff is usually tongue in cheek, but the top comment seems a bit crazy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I agree that calling it “killing whistleblowers” is a bit too early, but for the point that the top comment was making, it doesnt actually matter. Because his point was about the bravery of the other whistleblowers coming out and for that it doesnt matter if they actually got killed or not.

            The 10 other whistleblowers are brave because there is a good chance that at least one of the whistleblowers was killed. They are still brave even if it turns out that the dead ones died of natural causes or suicide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              If the “bravery” and admiration comes against the idea of assassination, then it completely matters. Idk why you’re hand waving the nonsense here

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                If the whistleblowers truly believe that the previous ones were assassinated, then they are brave for speaking out. They might be stupid, foolish, whatever, but they would be even more stupid if they didnt consider the possiblity of it being true.

                Intent is what matters here not what is actually the case. This is obvious when it comes to law. For example if a judge decides that you truly believed that your life was in danger in a situation and that you had to act in self defense, you can usually not be sentenced for murder, even if it turns out that your life wasnt in danger after all.

                Really this is a grammatical framing problem, but i think its totally fair to call these people “brave” either way, because even if their lives arent in danger, then at least their livelihood is.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  1: I wholeheartedly believe being a whistleblower is a courageous and brave act. Full stop.

                  2: drawing conclusions as to why these people decided to speak up when they did without hearing it from them is nonsense.

                  3: assuming and repeating a John Gresham novel from news articles between corporations and their whistleblowers is not only buying into a conspiracy theory, but is also parroting it.

                  4: partaking in these conspiratorial shenanigans helps no one and isn’t something to be waved away as harmless - otherwise, what’s the difference here and qanon?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 months ago

        Even if the dude that “killed himself” did do it to himself, he did so because he was harassed by a company for doing his job. Even in the non conspiracy version of the story, the corporation still acted in bad faith and should be held liable for it’s actions. Why is this the hill you want to die on?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          OK, but that’s a pretty big difference from hiring a hitman to explicitly murder him.

          Yes, it is different.

          No one is saying Boeing execs shouldn’t be prosecuted.

      • Hegar
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        It’s very naive to think that a weapons dealer who also kills it’s commercial airline passengers for profit isn’t also killing whistleblowers.

      • the post of tom joad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Bolexforpoop back wih pigshit again. The reason i don’t block you is your neverending entertainment value. Keep posting king.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 months ago

      I mean If it was an organized thing then I’m not sure it’s so dumb

      They can kill two people but if ten more people die it would look really bad on there part and would become undeniable

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      I was talking to someone the other day who was really bent out of shape over an extremely unpleasant customer. The kind of interaction that sticks with you for years.

      I told my perspective on people. We tend to remember remarkable things - stuff that really stands out from the normal. The news media does the same thing. Normal, everyday stuff isn’t “newsworthy.”

      So when an asshole customer stands out that much, it’s because it’s such a rare experience. People are mostly good, so the goodness doesn’t stand out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      Anyone saying humans suck and are terrible is likely a terrible person themselves. Decent people tend to see the better aspect of humanity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        This is a leap. You can be a good person and also see that people as a whole can be both wonderful and absolutely terrible. This is a story about a mega corp murdering two whistleblowers, so far. In this case, the people involved in making this a headline suck and are terrible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      Counterpoint. There was one whistleblower killed, there are lots of people on this case like Boeing staff, government employees, the police, senators, the president, who haven’t done shit. Now there are two murders. Any of the people who SHOULD be doing something about it doing anything? No. Now there are 12 brave people against the thousands of shit people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1637 months ago

    One death is coincidental, two is suspicious, any more and it’s gonna become plainly obvious, and now there’s 10. That’s just delicious. They can’t silence them all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        So in other words, very plausible deniability.

        https://allthatsinteresting.com/heart-attack-gun

        We had that tech in 1968. I’m pretty sure it would be a matter of a phone call and some change from the couch cushions for Boeing to create the recent outcome.

        Does this mean they did it? No.

        Does it warrant the reaction folks are having about it? Absolutely yes. (Edit - In light of their current troubles and the fate of the prior whistleblower.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          77 months ago

          which could cause death in minutes without leaving a trace.

          Aside from the puncture wound.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            97 months ago

            From the article:

            All that would be left behind was a tiny red dot where the dart entered the body, undetectable to those who didn’t know to look for it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                37 months ago

                Well that’s it. Case closed. The existence of a heart attack gun in 1968 proves Boeing killed 2 whistleblowers in 2024. Good job gang.

                Literally no one has made that statement, including me, the guy who brought up the heart attack gun. Take a breath man.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            77 months ago

            They may have ironed that out, this article is talking about tech that is more than half a century old. We got from first aeroplane to man on the moon in less than that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Does this mean they did it? No.

            Does it warrant the reaction folks are having about it? Absolutely yes. (Edit - In light of their current troubles and the fate of the prior whistleblower.)

            I stand by that statement, and don’t feel like trying again to connect the dots on the relevancy of my example for you. Whatever you are arguing about is - not the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        157 months ago

        And it is suspected that thousand of elderly people are murdered every year, but it is ruled as a natural death, because the demographic is prone to natural deaths and nobody bothers to check further.

        At the very least demanding a throughout investigation in both cases is absolutely reasonable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 months ago

      The first wasn’t coincidental. He said “hey they might murder me” then he died right before testifying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Well, iirc he didn’t show for his deposition, or the day after, or the day after that, at which point the lawyers sent people to find him and found he “committed suicide”.

        This is after he said “I am absolutely not going to commit suicide over this. If I die and people say it was suicide, I was killed.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Even one death under these circumstances is not a coincidence, and that ought to be coded into law. You’d better fucking well hope the person who blows a whistle on you is healthy - that’s the world we should move towards. Not that that couldn’t also be abused, but the pendulum is way too fucking far this way.

    • AggressivelyPassive
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      Can’t or won’t?

      Seriously, though, I wouldn’t be surprised, if a bunch of suicides or “retractions” are happening soon.

      How about 2 million if you shut up? No? How about we publish this dirt on you? Would be a shame, if some nameless robber orphans your children.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      Any serious issue should have a paper trail of some sort. Emails, meetings, part rejections, that sort of thing. There are processes in place to allow anonymous reporting of some of these things.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      But you wont argue that 10 dead whistblowers can still be a tremendous coincidence, right?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1557 months ago

    Gotta love my fellow millennials - battered old souls that only the offer of getting murdered gets us properly motivated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      577 months ago

      Most of us see that as a perk. “Wait, I can die right now, painlessly? Like totally painless? Where do I sign up?”

      • pachrist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        667 months ago

        I mean, if the choice is instant, painless death or decade after decade of your parents asking why you don’t own a house, I guess death is fine?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        I mean, I dont care abut pain as much as time - like I would settle for something interesting, like getting sucked off to death … into a jet engine at max speed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          He’s always taking the train to his missions, that’s the reason for the long time between the 2 kills

        • applepie
          link
          fedilink
          87 months ago

          Are you telling us that there is a chance some whistlebowers have a chance to live into 2025.

          Believe or not still not enough time for FAA and other fed soups to do their job

    • gregorum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You could just say ‘assassin’. “Hitperson” makes it sound like some HR-designated position, awkwardly titled in some neutral, milquetoast way as not to offend anyone.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        217 months ago

        “Hitperson” makes it sound like some HR-designated position, awkwardly titled in some neutral, milquetoast way as not to offend anyone.

        That was intentional, I’m happy someone noticed.

        • gregorum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Like the title of a Wes Anderson short, lol

          It’s just a single shot of Bill Murray driving a car on a highway. He’s filmed from the passenger seat, and he’s telling a story of his dad, who worked as an engineer designing jet engines. And he’s all proud and going on and on.

          And as he keeps talking, and as he keeps driving, you keep seeing shots of highway signs showing that you’re driving through rural Maryland on your way to Washington DC. You keep driving and he keeps telling a story about his father and how proud he was and eventually comes out that he worked for Boeing.

          And you keep driving and he keeps telling a story and eventually you pull up in front of the building in Washington DC, and he gets out and the camera keeps pointing at the driver seat, but he walks out of frame and he walks into the building and you can hear some screaming in a couple gunshots and then cut to the credits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1147 months ago

    Article author seems to have completely fabricated the “10 more”. There are no quotes from anyone even hinting at more whistleblowers existing, let alone ten more.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    957 months ago

    Wow, ten more suicidal people that really want to off themselves and also suddenly all started talking about Boeing, all at the same time. They’ll also all off themselves in the coming weeks.

    What are the chances of that happening?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      307 months ago

      For real. If ever there were a time to hop on an Amtrak, I think this would be a good one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 months ago

        I would want the motherfucking Navy to take me around South America, the passenger train system in the US is sadly so sparse it makes it too easy for someone to find someone else based on odds. And Amtrak doesn’t have anti air weapons

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Hope it carries Lockheed s planes nstead of… Boing

              (Typo intentional, get off grammar Nazis)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                Navy and Air Force still have plenty of Boeings that were made properly. They’re talking about fitting the B-52 with warp engines rather than ever retire the thing

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  37 months ago

                  B52 with warp nacelles in an aircraft carrier? Hhhhm let me check something in midjourney and I’ll be back soon

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          You think they will make a boing machine just drop in on the train? I mean at the rate those planes are failing, I would not be surprised if that happens by chance even. Damn, this was their plan from the start, wasn’t it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      217 months ago

      It’s okay, they are all going to commit suicide by jumping off together. The plane will have no issues.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        The will get off the plane and then get on the shuttle never to be heard from again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      187 months ago

      Oh the plane will be fine. Being a whistleblower is very stressful though. I would not be at all surprised if many if not all of them find it just too hard to go on and end up committing suicide by shooting themselves twice in the back of the head before jumping off a building.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Jumping off a building is the Russian way.

        American way is walking into a school in the middle of a shooting.

        Australian way is going to the mall to bet on the ponies and running into a stabber. (I’m really sorry this is too soon, but next week nobody would understand the joke)

  • JackFrostNCola
    link
    fedilink
    English
    737 months ago

    “what are they going to do, kill all of us?” - dead whistleblower

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        317 months ago

        Criticizing the Israel government is okay (until our government outlaws it at least). Suggesting the people of Israel are some special kind of corrupt is not okay. Our corruption is our own.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        237 months ago

        Explain in detail how you associate Israel in a debate of the unrelated context of correlating American corruption to corporate greed.

        Is this just some underhanded antisemite sort of bullshit invoking Israel but really trying to associate Jews with corporate greed? Cuz thats what is seems to infer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          I mean, suggesting that a lot of bigger US companies are infested with Israeli intelligence and suggesting that Israel is interested in corruption levels in the US not being reduced is not antisemitic. It seems sane actually.

          But I haven’t seen the original comment before it was deleted.

      • Queue
        link
        fedilink
        English
        187 months ago

        Mate, I hate the genocide and shit, but shut the fuck up with this. The two are unrelated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      Investigators work for a company named Boeing.

      As ofc do their assassins.

      Same department and job title actually. Spawn kill basically.

  • Onii-Chan
    link
    fedilink
    477 months ago

    It’ll be such a surprise when it turns out all 10 have been suicidal for years and/or extremely susceptible to infection.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    467 months ago

    “the sudden announcement of Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun’s resignation by the end of 2024 was interpreted as a response to the company’s persistent safety issues.”

    I hope Boeing has serious bonus claw-backs in their contracts, because this idiot’s “cost-savings” have actually cost Boeing a fortune, and destroyed their reputation. The entire board should go.