• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    5844 months ago

    Any moment now, the ‘don’t vote for Biden’ group will be in here telling us not to vote for Harris. And if it isn’t Harris, they’ll tell us not to vote for whoever it is.

    Anything but stop the dictator and his plan to commit genocide against Latinos and queer people.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1374 months ago

      Even if Trump wasn’t going to do awful things, I can’t stand his stupid face or his stupid voice or his stupid stupidity. That’s enough to vote for someone who’ll beat him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1074 months ago

      I didn’t want to believe it but they’re already in the comments. We need to be vocal. Kamala is a great candidate.

    • dadarobot
      link
      fedilink
      694 months ago

      Most of the biden haters i know on the left are upset about his support for israel. Harris has been much more critical of the genocide. We’ll just have to see.

      I didnt want to vote for biden, but was still going to vote blue no matter who. Im glad i dont have to vote for genocide anymore.

    • Queue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      60
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I may be a weirdo, but I was on the “I’d consider not voting for Biden.” but I’m currently more interested in Harris. Nowhere near as bad of a track record as Biden had. From being racist, to supporting rapists getting into the Supreme Court, to backing massive removal of constitutional rights.

      Harris’ record isn’t perfect, and while I’m in California, I don’t recall any bills she pushed/voted for as Senator that was anything as bad as the USA PATRIOT Act. I don’t like her record as our AG at all, but Senator is a different story.

      If she picks a good VP pick, I’d be down. I’m wanting maybe Newsom, but that’s just he biggest Democrat I know, as he’s my Governor.

      Edit: I don’t know how to make it clear: I live in California. If I voted for a ham sandwich for oresident it would have the same impact as voting for Biden. My state’s EC is clear and chosen, and popular vote doesn’t decide the president otherwise we’d never have Trump. I was considering going Greens, but I’m looking forward to Harris. Get mad at undecideds in Swing States and Trump supporters, not a registered Democrat in California.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      554 months ago

      I’m really hoping if Harris still has to be on the ticket that she’ll stay VP. It would be nice to have a decent prez option.

      But I’ll be voting anti trump either way.

      • Hegar
        link
        fedilink
        36
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It would be nice to have a decent prez option.

        It would also be nice not to live on a burning planet controlled by decrepit rich psychopaths but I don’t think either of us will be getting what we want.

        I’ll still vote for whatever the democrats decide to run, of course, since minimizing or maximizing fascists’ access to government is the only question on the ballot this election.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          since minimizing or maximizing fascists’ access to government is the only question on the ballot this election

          Why?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      234 months ago

      Absolutely they will. When the gEnOciDe stopped working/got boring, they switched to- oLd!

      Give it a day, they’ll have their reasons not to vote for her too.

    • NoIWontPickAName
      link
      fedilink
      234 months ago

      Nah, I said I would support her if that’s what it came down to.

      She needs a good VP though with her record.

      That debate and the putin -Zelensky trump-Harris mixups so short together.

      Pull in Buttigieg and you have a white male as a backup to calm people down and maybe pull in the gay vote.

      I understand how the last sentence could be seen the wrong way, but it’s the cynical reality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Harris isn’t ideal, but she’s an improvement. She’s less on board with genocide than Bidenyahu, and she can fog a mirror.

      Vote for Harris. Don’t make the party regret listening.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      174 months ago

      Hi, I think you’ve seen me in enough places saying not to vote for Biden.

      Go vote for Harris.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You wanna know how to shut those people up? Replace First Past The Post voting with something like Ranked Choice voting. Then they would have to make their own party and show us how it’s done. (No spoiler effect to)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      124 months ago

      Cool strawman you’re beating up. I think the majority of us that didn’t want Biden is because he didn’t have a good path to victory. We didn’t want to just stand by and watch the train wreck happen. Harris isn’t much better, but at least she is better, and I will be on board with that of that’s who is chosen. I would rather see Whitmer be on the top of the ticket though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      124 months ago

      The reason we haven’t seen it happen yet is that they weren’t prepared for this. They need to make some memes and talking points, make sure everyone is on the same page. Give it a day or so, and we’ll start seeing a strangely concerted effort against Harris.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      The criterion is very simple: Don’t vote for genocide committers, enablers or planners. That excludes Biden and Trump.

      If the Dems manage to produce a non genocide loving candidate, then vote vote vote and drag everyone who will vote for the non genocide candidate to the polling station.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3444 months ago

    An aside, I hate that this was posted to twitter before it was posted to Biden’s own website or the White House’s website first.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3024 months ago

    WHAT AM I GOING TO DO WITH ALL MY BIDEN HATS, FLAGS, T-SHIRTS, AND STICKERS?!

    /Just kidding - not in a cult 😅

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      774 months ago

      As a very vocal Biden hater I’ll stomach Kamela far better and would be thrilled for someone else

      • Xhieron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Stomach isn’t enough. If you’re not actively campaigning and donating for her–or whomever the candidate is–then you may as well have been a Republican.

        EDIT: Nevermind. Clearly the hivemind wants to stay in our armchairs. Who can blame us, right? We’ll continue this conversation in November. I hope it’s not I-told-you-so.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              344 months ago

              In what way? I’m saying insulting people is not a way to get them to campaign.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                64 months ago

                Any moment now, the ‘don’t vote for Biden’ group will be in here telling us not to vote for Harris. And if it isn’t Harris, they’ll tell us not to vote for whoever it is.

                Anything but stop the dictator and his plan to commit genocide against Latinos and queer people.

                Then why are you insulting people here by making up a strawman argument and insinuating that the people who don’t support unpopular candidates are somehow rooting for Trump? This is like the DNC’s 2016 arrogance all over again and look how that turned out for the country.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  84 months ago

                  It’s still not a strawman argument that people who were posting all over Lemmy that no one should vote for Biden are now posting in this very thread that people shouldn’t vote for Harris either.

                  Also, I’m not trying to get people who aren’t planning on voting for Harris to campaign for Harris. That would be silly. So I have no problem with anything that I said.

          • Xhieron
            link
            fedilink
            English
            64 months ago

            Squid, I appreciate your contributions to putting content on the platform, honestly, but I couldn’t be any less interested in that take. My history speaks for itself, and anybody can read it who cares to. Everybody must vote. I don’t think I could be any clearer about that. I was a staunch advocate for Biden, and I’ll be a staunch advocate for Harris, Newsom, Whitmer, or anyone else who carries the Democratic party forward.

            But every single one of them polls down from Biden. To the extent any of the whining on social media since the debate hasn’t been astroturfed, advocacy for Biden to drop out resulted in this news, and it means that the party has now voluntarily given up the single biggest proven advantage a candidate historically has in a presidential election: being the sitting president.

            I’m encouraging people to vote, but you know as well as I do that people who were going to vote anything-blue were going to vote for Biden no matter what anybody said on almost-reddit. Harris has to move the needle further than that, and that means that all the armchair it’ll-be-better-if-he-drops-out analysts now need to step the fuck up if they want this news to mean anything other than “The DNC just handed Trump 2024.”

            Everybody knows that the kids screaming “oh if the candidate were just younger, the Dems would have it in a landslide” were full of shit, and now we’re about to see just how big a deficit we’re actually running. I’d love to be wrong! I’d be delighted, ecstatic, beside myself to discover that next weeks polls put all these convention front-runners up 10 points on Trump. But I’ve studied this stuff, and it doesn’t take a veteran pollster to realize it doesn’t work that way. Actual campaigning has to happen.

            If you cared enough to want Biden out, but not quite enough to want Harris to win, then you were going to hold your nose in the ballot box either way and it doesn’t fucking matter: Trump would still win. That’s not discouraging. That’s statistics.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              494 months ago

              Telling people that if they don’t go out and campaign, they might as well be a Republican is just counterproductive. Insulting people is just never a way to get them to do what you think they should do.

              I don’t know why so many people think that’s the right tack. Have you ever been insulted into doing something?

              • Xhieron
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 months ago

                The few words of hyperbole is what you took away? I expected better, but I guess that’s on me.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  204 months ago

                  The few words are the problem. And I doubt people are viewing it as hyperbole.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          234 months ago

          We win if we get enough votes, and every vote counts.

          Anything beyond voting is just gravy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          224 months ago

          The “hive mind” probably just can’t figure out what the fuck you’re even trying to say. So, what, everybody who doesn’t actively campaign for their preferred candidate just supports fascism by default? I’m guessing your stance isn’t anywhere near that stupid, because that is an extraordinarily stupid stance. So maybe you’d have a better reception if you clarified your point.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          204 months ago

          With people like you it shows why Trump won culturally even if he doesn’t win the election. He turned a substantial part of the vocal Democrats into Blue-MAGA-hats. It is the same attitude that attacked people who pointed out the mere fact, that Biden is not mentally fit for office anymore. If the Blue-MAGA wasn’t so big, Biden could have left the field to a younger and better candidate half a year ago.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              234 months ago

              So you think calling everyone that does not campaign and donate to the Democrats a secret Republican is somehow normal?

              To me it is the same cultish bullshit like the blatant denial of Bidens old age and mental decline. It is the same “follow your leader no matter what” insanity that is apologetic for Trump on the other side. So yes, this kind of behaviour is MAGA behaviour and if it is done for the Dems instead of the Reps it is blue MAGA

        • Queue
          link
          fedilink
          144 months ago

          I guess the poor and disabled and people who are too busy with struggling to survive are secretly republicans now.

          “Hey I have a weak immune system, so I have to work from home and that limits my income and my free time.”

          “I smell a Republican!”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          54 months ago

          Absolutely not. I will spend my time and energy and money supporting my local Democrats. The national level isn’t as important to me because Republicans in my state have veto-proof majorities in both houses and they hold the governorship. Regardless of what happens at the national level, implementation of Project 2025 began in my state about 3 years ago.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          You couldn’t browbeat us into voting for Biden and you’ve started it right up with Harris? And now it’s not just voting it’s working the phones and door to door campaign? Am I expected to get airfare to PA too? What do I tell them when they ask where I live?

          People should support her campaign to the utmost they can, and for some people that’s right here, with their internet connection.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I was vocally saying biden would never drop out and we just had to swallow the poison pill. I was dead wrong. I will be voting for [insert DNC candidate] and will be excited to do it!

    • NoIWontPickAName
      link
      fedilink
      354 months ago

      Harris ain’t perfect, but she’s not on the same mental state as Biden is.

      He did a lot of good, but he just wasn’t there anymore, he’s getting pretty old and just had the most stressful job in the world for 4 years.

      Plus he just backed Israel through every thing.

      She’ll probably do the same, but I KNOW that he’ll do it.

      Tbf I changed my mind to voting for him after he finally managed to get Ukraine more aid, so idk how everyone else will go.

      Hopefully she grabs a good VP to calm people down

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144 months ago

      While I don’t think Kamala is the best the Democratic party has to offer (I would have much preferred Biden endorsing Hakeem Jeffries, for example), I’m over the moon that he’s finally decided to step aside. And you know what? Harris is better than Biden in pretty much every metric that matters. I was going to vote for the Dem nominee either way, but him stepping aside in favor of a better candidate has me feeling all kinds of relieved.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1104 months ago

        Senator Mark Kelly, he can do this

        He flipped AZ to blue

        He is an astronaut, all American, former servicemen

        He can get red votes and blue alike

        • alienzx
          link
          fedilink
          English
          334 months ago

          Isn’t senator Kelly the one that created the mutant registration act?

        • ALQ
          link
          fedilink
          154 months ago

          Hmm…not bad. Not amazing name recognition, but that could be remedied.

          Having Gabby campaign for/with him, especially after the DJT assassination attempt, could be beneficial, too. (Or could look like a disgusting political plot, but that’s really all our politics.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Kelly or Mayor Pete seem like the best options.

          Buttigieg and AOC ticket? That would be the youth candidacy. Kelly and Buttigieg or vice versa would be more centrist but probably be the most robust candidacy.

          I hate to say it, but in this political climate and with the threat of Trump, the best shot is probably two young-ish white guys.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          Damn that would be a great pick. I’d like to see AOC but Kelly probably has more broad appeal with all the things you mentioned.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          I highly doubt Kamala will want to pull a sitting Democratic senator away from the 50/50 Senate given the elections coming up.

          I think there is a greater chance that she picks one of the governors. My pick is J.B. Pritzker.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            That is true, I really was just spitballing, I’ll have to look into JB Pritzker, I’m regrettably unfamiliar with him

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            134 months ago

            I find this so insane. People talk about who gets to keep the money, who has which rich asshole routing for them, which strategy has been successfull in the past, like always setting up the current president for reelection…

            We need to focus on who has actually inspiring policies and ideas. We need to focus on these, because that is what the Reps lack. All they offer is “not the Dems” while the policies they propose are actually unpopular with many of their base. And the whole “Not Trump” strategy of Biden just fell apart.

            Is there noone in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

            • Pandantic [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              54 months ago

              Is there no one in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

              This is why I think Pete Buttigieg should throw his hat in if they do have a primary. He just had a Bill Maher interview that just went viral because he knows how to talk to the common people. I think his visions are inspiring, he’s done a lot of work for his department, and he isn’t afraid to walk across party lines and go on Republican shows to talk about the real problems. He’s smart enough to smash Trump in a debate, calling out all his lies, and even if Trump is too scared to debate him, he has no problem laying out Trump’s lies elsewhere coherently and cognitively.

          • SeaJ
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            No, they don’t. The Democratic Party can give the donated money to whoever is the candidate. Not sure where people are getting that.

            Edit: After reading up, I am mistaken kind of. If Harris is still the VP candidate, the money could be used. Otherwise a PAC would have to be setup to funnel money to the candidate…maybe. Bloomberg was simply able to transfer his campaign funds directly to the DNC since it was part of his campaign money…even though the vast majority of it was his own money.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              144 months ago

              The money Biden has raised directly however can only go to the people that were on his ticket at the time the donation was made

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                34 months ago

                That’s correct, but nearly none of the money is the direct donation stuff - it’s almost in PACs which are (due to a legal fiction) entirely independent of the candidate.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 months ago

                  There are still more restrictions however on spending on other candidates and they would have to act like any other PAC, only helping via donating/running ads in support of (but importantly not directly by) any other candidate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The $100 million warchest belongs to the Biden/Harris campaign, not the Democratic Party. They are separate organizations, and Biden/Harris only answers to Biden and Harris.

              The DNC has its own funds of course, but nowhere near as much. And DNC funds are supposed to be shared with multiple Democrats, not just the one running for president.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                54 months ago

                And notably even if Biden/Harris were supporting the alternative, they’re an outside group. They can spend like a super PAC, but can’t pay bills or do direct advertising.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              On the one hand: “you can’t have her she’s ours!”. On the other, she’s out in 26 regardless, and she’s pretty good so maybe we can share with the rest of the country.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            I just don’t think she can beat big orange. I’m not saying she shouldn’t … but I don’t know … doubtful

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              9
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              He was a prosecutor for years, so she has plently of oratory chops, and shes 20 years younger than trump to boot.

              Her only liability is the she is a she and there are plently of sexist fucks out there. Thats it.

              • ALQ
                link
                fedilink
                134 months ago

                You forgot that she’s a POC and there are also tons of racists fucks out there.

                Even before getting to her actual credentials (some great, others really not), people will be assholes. I still have hope that she, as a former prosecutor, could mop the floor with the fascists.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          174 months ago

          Half of America lost it’s mind when Obama was elected, and we’re still dealing with the fallout from that lovely dose of racism. There’s no way Kamala could win in this country.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            194 months ago

            Obama won. And then won again. Stop pumping up the reactionaries as some unstoppable force. They’re a minority and have been on a long term losing streak.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            194 months ago

            like all that aside, a lot of folks aren’t appreciative of her background as a cop… but yeah that’s a cherry to what you already mentioned

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              154 months ago

              And a lot of swing voters will probably like that she was a prosecutor, a “law and order” type.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                34 months ago

                I think most of the “law and order” types might have a bigger problem with her being a black woman.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  She aint “black” as much as “brown.” Its an incredibly stupid hair to split, but indians are generally considered a “model minority” by racists, so it will likely hurt her but not as much as you may think.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t particularly like her, then again I detest nearly all politicians. That being said, I’m more motivated to vote, that’s for certain. I didn’t mind Biden, but it felt like elder abuse lol. He’s been better than anyone in my lifetime. Good God, I’d rather have her than Hilary as the first woman in the spot. Biden was just hard to watch and that position needs someone that will have to live with the consequences of the decisions in office. Will be curious to see who else puts their name in. 4 years ago he said he wouldn’t run again and he seems to be keeping that promise too. If they were clever, they’d put Biden as VP or as an advisor.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          She’ll have to be. Anybody else would be starting from square one, and that’s a luxury we don’t have right now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        104 months ago

        This late in the game, it’s almost certainly Harris. Probably picks a swing state governor like Whitmer or Shapiro.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          Or Mark Kelly. Regardless, it’s probably going to be a white male from a swing state to appeal to as broad of an electorate as possible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      37
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Literally any straight white man center-right democrat born after 1968 would wipe the floor with trump.

      And before anyone jumps down my throat, that’s not what I want. I want president Cortez. But presidents are chosen by money and by about 10,000 generically stupid swing voters in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    914 months ago

    Bernie 2024, even if he dies of a heart attack first day his appointments would change the country for good and I don’t trust any party politicians on Palestine.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        404 months ago

        Biden just endorsed Kamala, so that much is likely. The VP will probably be one from a shortlist of 5 or so governors/senators from swing states.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          134 months ago

          Maybe, but then the swing state could end up with a GOP governor. That’s one reason why VPs are often from safe seats, eg Harris, Pence, Biden, Palin, Quayle…

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            The shortlist I’ve seen thrown around a lot so far is pretty much Whitmer, Shapiro, Cooper, and Kelly. Maybe someone like Beshear, but I’d call that slightly lower odds than the others. I think they will probably lean away from a 2 woman ticket too

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            This is why I’m really hoping they don’t pick Shapiro. Having three democratic governors in a row is a fluke in PA and I don’t think we’d avoid getting a Republican next.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That would be cool but I suspect it will be a white, straight man to balance out the ticket for the racists and sexists. Maybe someone from a swing state.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          54 months ago

          Yes more pandering from the DNC to the far right individuals who would never vote for a Democrat to begin with.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            Pandering to the right, yes - but this is just how coalitions work. Obama’s ability to appeal to rank and file white workers in places like Michigan is part of how he won. A lot of Obama voters in those states voted for Trump.

            Not everyone on the right is an ideological zealot (even if those are the most visible and make up the base). Being able to pick up some votes among “center-right” voters is a long-standing electoral strategy for the Democrats.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        134 months ago

        As an outside observer I find it hard to believe that a place as right-wing as the US would elect a woman of colour as president. Isn’t that double red rag to the nutjob bulls?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          We elected Obama already, and the people who are so racist/sexist that they wouldn’t vote for Harris are mostly voting Trump. Plus, her being a woman means she can go way harder on Abortion, which is a winning strategy atm since support for abortion rights is insanely high and Republicans are actively trying to ban it completely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        104 months ago

        Hot damn I had forgotten about a new vp pick in the middle of all this. AOC won’t be it but needs to be.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        that would be great, but there’s no way they double down on minorities and women in the same ticket. get ready for a biden jr as the VP.

      • John Richard
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        Seeing AOC oddly shill for Biden before he dropped out… which I’d expect from Pelosi, Schumer & Schiff, but not from her. She may actually be trying to get the VP spot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Or you could read her arguments, which were direct and pragmatic. She was talking about how difficult this would be logistically, and that it would have been better to do 6 months ago, you know, when the progressive wing of the party raised the issue.

          AOC was “shilling” for some consistency, backbone and party unity out of a pragmatic need to beat back fascism. Now that this choice has been made, I’m betting she will continue with the same intent.

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            84 months ago

            Biden was going to lose and he was making other Democrats lose. What did you expect the party to do, unite behind losing to Trump?

            AOC was prob smart, saw Biden didn’t believe he was going to lose and saw an opportunity before it played out.

          • TipRing
            link
            fedilink
            English
            64 months ago

            Further, Bernie and AOC are rather well aware that the progressive wing of the party would likely be blamed for “party disunity” if Biden stayed in and lost. They will not do anything to let the DNC scapegoat their caucus.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          104 months ago

          Which is hilarious because Pelosi, Schumer, and Schiff were all against Biden continuing in the race…

          AOC understands politics and thinks things through, that’s it.

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            74 months ago

            AOC has always been considered an outsider to Democrat leadership. She prob was thinking things through, but I don’t think it is because she thought Biden was going to win.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          Imo she’s trying to shield progressives from being the scapegoat, like how we got the blame for dem dysfunction in '16.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          54 months ago

          Politics is about getting the things you want, not dunking on people that disagree with you on a couple of things. You gotta compromise with people to get what you want. People feel like being uncompromising is somehow admirable, but in politics it means you get nothing. MAGAs are uncompromising, and they get a lot of likes on social media for it, but they’ve accomplish exactly nothing after winning the House in 2022.

          Biden has been good for the progressive wing of the party, and they may not get as good of a deal with Harris as they did with Biden. They will have to negotiate compromises with someone new and may not get as much.

          So do you rather politicians compromising and getting something to benefit you, or grandstanding and accomplishing nothing except providing a small amount of entertainment for you?

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            Biden has seriously hurt the party. If they enthrone Kamala without doing some balanced process to have her debate or compete against anyone else, and she somehow beats Trump then… I fully expect Republicans to take the House & Senate because of the damage Biden did to the party.

            Politics is about compromise. I fully agree with you on that. To get things passed, you actually have to call up Republicans and ask them if they’ll try to work with you and what their vision is, and what they’d like to do… and try to come to an agreement.

            AOC has likely done the same here. She saw an opportunity to get something or to help progressives in some way, which required taking a backseat for a little while, but ultimately she’ll get something in return. I get it and understand that. It was just surprising.

            The DNC & Clinton seriously damaged the Democrat party in 2016, and Biden has restored some consistency, but it shifted significantly the right after that. Lest not forget Biden gleefully supporting a genocidal maniac and sending weapons to kill thousands of children. Its pretty sad when Democrats argue that more children would have died under Trump, so that somehow makes it okay.

    • JackFrostNCola
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      I think bernie could wipe the floor with any sitting senator of any age he comes up against but with bidens age and recent performance there is no way you will convince everyone with bernies age factor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        754 months ago

        Biden wasn’t viable because he has cognitive decline. Kamala will mop the floor with Trump in debates.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            94 months ago

            Absolutely. They had no reason to debate Biden again. They sure as shit won’t put him on stage against her, or ANY other candidate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 months ago

              This would be awesome. Give Harris a two hour uninterrupted prime time spot to let the former prosecutor make a case against electing a convicted felon and follow it with 2 hours of the oldest candidate in US history rambling. 😆

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                I’d love to see it. Prosecutor going after a convicted felon and rapist sounds like a great time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          274 months ago

          Trump will visibly age on stage like Palpatine from the absolute roasting Harris would do to him

        • DarkGamer
          link
          fedilink
          18
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Both candidates are experiencing decline, and if Biden were elected and incapable of doing the job it would have resulted in a Harris Presidency anyway. It’s such an odd thing to object over. We’ve had presidents in decline before and the country kept running just fine, (FDR, Reagan.)

          Biden did a fine job in office, I’m especially proud of his union support, and his policies were spot on in my opinion. To throw him under the bus like this seems really shitty.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Do you think debates are really going to sway voters at this point? Like the people considering Trump don’t already know what a blowhard he is?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            64 months ago

            Debates can energize the voter base which is what we need right now. And who knows, the debates might even convince some people.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        94 months ago

        To be fair, most people really don’t know much about her yet. She’s mostly stayed in the shadows as a VP. That could change, for better or worse, when they know her better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        This is a hilarious misreading of polling data. Kamala may not win, but her percentage chance to win might be double or more of what Bidens was.

        People I follow were estimating Biden at 10-15% by the time the election rolled around. All the models assume that a candidate would run a normal campaign. Something that he is not capable of doing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    434 months ago

    As much as I think that he was too old for the position… JFC. If the Dems don’t nominate Kamala Harris as his replacement, the entire Democratic nomination will be filled with so much infighting that they will lose the faith of their electorate and the next election.

    If only more Dems were left-of-centre such that Bernie was a viable option. Unfortunately almost all of them are right-lite.

  • Hello_there
    link
    fedilink
    394 months ago

    I’m going to donate to DNC to signal that this was a good idea

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    354 months ago

    Welp they must have looked at the data and saw Kamala or someone else would do significantly better. Hope they’re right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      It’s basically 50/50 with either Biden or Harris at the top of the ticket. Everything is in the margin of error, and polling has been notoriously inaccurate with Trump on the ballot.

      So you have to basically ignore the simple Trump vs. Biden or Trump vs. Harris or (Trump vs. anyone else you can think of) numbers because it’s pretty much unknown. But the data says a majority (even an majority of Democrats) want someone other than Biden on the ballot at election. BTW a majority of voters also want someone other than Trump on the ballot too.

      There’s also some data to suggest Trump is making some inroads with young male Black and Hispanic voters. Harris will negate a significant amount of that immediately and potentially even more when the GOP can’t resist blowing their racist dog whistles and show voters who they really are.

      So it’s kinda about looking at the data, but I think a large part of it is simple campaign facts. In times past a Presidential candidate would do two (sometimes three) rallies in two different states per day. And do interviews while traveling between campaign events. Trump isn’t capable of that pace. Biden most certainly isn’t capable of that pace. Harris can do that. We really haven’t seen a 100% balls to the wall presidential campaign in a while because it’s been two old guys in the last election and in this one… until now.

      Remember Biden also had to do the job of being President of the country while also campaigning. That’s a lot of work for even someone young, and Biden is so very old. Sure Harris is VP, but that’s mostly just getting some briefings (too keep up on events in case she might need to take over as Prez) and breaking ties in the Senate (which probably won’t be needed between now and election day). She can devote almost all of her time to campaigning while Biden couldn’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      I hope so and if true we have to trust the data. My vote is solid blue based on virtues and most policies. There’s probably a lot of others like me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    264 months ago

    In 2016 it was a “Vote Against Trump Regardless Of Who It Is”. It’s shaping up to be that again, but this gives me hope that maybe we’ll have someone we can vote for that we like… Even if just a little. Harris is no Obama in charm, but it’s a step in the right direction.