• @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          30
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I think a lot of conservative “Christians” think that if they pretend like they are following the way of Christ according to their bastardized version where they hate queer people, that they’ll somehow be able to declare themselves right and be able to stay the mean shits that they are. When in reality Jesus would not approve of their behaviour at all.

          Edited to add: I actually practice Christianity and go to a very progressive church. I love queer people, I think conservatives are a cancer on society, and I believe in birth control and abortion rights like I invented them. I am not wild about Jesus or the Bible, and I mostly attend because I believe in a God and I think attending a community space where we want to be better humans together in a happy and life giving way is a vital part of life. I do not in any way expect people to believe what I do and I welcome most points of view, conservative trash and Nazis excluded. I have sort of a gnostic view I guess where I think intelligence and the ability to act accordingly is what saves you as a human.

          But everything conservatives are doing religiously to me is utter self serving rotten trash.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            204 months ago

            I’m a “progressive” Christian as well. Quoting Bible verses to MAGA’s is a fun exercise. They often get this guilty looking expression for a minute and then just kind of shake it off and go back to whatever hypocritical BS they were up to before.

            It’s fascinating to watch.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            More of the right will identify as Christian’s but the left is much closer to the teachings of Jesus because the fruits of the spirit are: love, compassion, empathy, understanding, kindness, gentleness, truthfulness, brotherhood, forbearance, faith, joy, just to name a few.

            When thinking of those “fruits” not many people think of the conservative Christian’s. It bothers me more than anything they hide behind their “beliefs” to push their personal agenda that goes directly against the teachings of Jesus. Gives Christianity a bad name, then again I would say each religion has it’s own group of extremist that make the whole look bad.

            Edit: Spelling

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            54 months ago

            I had a neighbor come to my door wanting to read some bible verses. I was initially combative because I’m trans and have a pride flag in my window and was ready to be preached to about how I’m a sinner. I’m not religious but we actually had a really nice conversation about exactly this. I told them that I don’t believe in Jesus but do believe in the message of the bible, being a loving and caring person to everybody, and how conservatives have completely twisted the meaning to attack people like me. They read me a couple verses supporting that and how conservatives go against everything the bible says. It really gave me hope and what I was expecting to ruin my day actually made it instead.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              Honestly there’s some lovely Christians out there who love queer people without question. It absolutely does not have to be the conservative way. My church has gay people and two trans ladies, and the one time I overheard one of them talking to a bunch of the guys about the local football team. Like it absolutely does not have to mean a thing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Sorry if this comes off as rude, but without Christ, you’re not a Christian. Christianity is the state of being saved, and you can’t good-person your way into salvation. There are three problems with that approach:

            • If you believe you can save yourself, that’s an issue of pride. How can your living works ever compare to God’s own son dying for you?
            • If you willfully ignore Christ’s salvation (the easier option) in favor of doing good works, that shows an unwillingness to repent of your sins.
            • If you try to meet God’s standards (or even just what you think they are) through your works, you’ll never catch up, and you’ll exhaust yourself.

            Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying there’s no point in good works or being a good person. They’re the fruits, but they’re not the tree. You can put effort into showing fruits, but without the tree, it’s not going to do you any good in the long run. Or you can grow the tree, and if it’s real, the fruits will come naturally (and if they don’t, the tree is dead[1].)

            It’s only by humility that you can come to salvation. You must recognize your sin and be willing to turn from it (and keep trying whenever you fail.) Otherwise, you’re ultimately not that different from the conservative politicians who pretend to be Christian while sticking to their hateful ways (only in your case, the ways in question might not be hateful.)

            I say this not to condemn you, but in hope that you can be saved. Please don’t ignore it.


            1. James 2:17, though on further consideration, the whole chapter is fairly relevant. ↩︎

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              23 months ago

              This is a made-up version of Christianity that didn’t exist until the last few hundred years. It’s heresy and unless you repent, you’re going to hell.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 months ago

                Is 20 a few? The idea of salvation being through Christ alone is literally in the Bible. What are you talking about? I’ve repented of my sins, and belief in the Bible is not a sin.

                Are you talking Catholicism? Even then, you still have Ephesians 2:8-9 “For by grace, you have been saved through faith. And this is not of yourselves, for it is a gift of God. And this is not of works, so that no one may glory.” (CPDV) and James 2 still making it clear that faith without works is dead.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  It’s false that your heresy has existed for 2000 years; it’s only been the last few hundred. Salvation is through the Church, not through Christ, and outside the church you’re damned. Sorry.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Funny you mention this because I was about to bring it up but as a bad thing. They don’t care about Jesus or his teachings or any of that because they see the whole “all of your sins will be forgiven” as “I can do whatever I want and then just have to tell a priest about it before I die and then I get into heaven”. Why they think they can pull a fast one on a being they believe is omniscient is beyond me, best guess is maybe they have a really simplistic view of rules and think exploiting loopholes can be done in good faith?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                34 months ago

                The Bible actually has things to say about that mindset. Namely, if you think “I can go back to sin and just get forgiven afterwards no biggie,” and then do so, you’re not going to get forgiven (Hebrews 10.) But that doesn’t get preached much, probably because it’s easy to get it twisted and think that an inadvertent slip into sin will have the same effect.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          Same for the rest too.

          They like trump because he’s a great “business man”. Yet he’s not.

          They like kid rock because he’s a ‘country rock rebel.’ Nahh he’s just old and stale.

          They like elon because he is a ‘genius.’ LOL no.

          They just vibing and can’t be bothered to actually give a shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          That’s exactly the case. Christianity follows Paul, not Jesus, and only keeps the “Christ” part for marketing

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        I wouldn’t have thought so either, but I bet there is a lot of spill over from Trump > Elon and a lot of Trump supporters are religious nut jobs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      I used to be a fan of kid Rock…

      It was the early 2000’s.

      I’m still down with a lot of music from that time, I’ll still rock Smash mouth, I sympathize with what happened to their lead singer, but kid Rock is entirely self inflicted and instead of the world moving on from him (like smash mouth) they have him on a pedestal. Why should anyone from my generation be on a political tour because of music they made? It pretty much all sucked. They didn’t write any of it themselves… Barely any of them even performed it live. I respect Nickelback “Rockstar” for calling this out.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        264 months ago

        Dipping communion wafers in ranch dressing for the win!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          94 months ago

          I think the Aramaic spoken at the time would have been pronounced closer to Yeshua or Yeshu.

          The sentiment still stands dude was pretty chill, except that one time he fliped the tables of the money changers and hucksters turning a house of worship into a house of commerce. Still pretty based of him.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            54 months ago

            He did get so fuckin pissed he cursed a tree forever because it didn’t have any fruit for him to eat that one time.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      184 months ago

      I honestly think Jesus would be a little embarrassed to have people hanging on his every word and ascribing meanings to it in the form of a book report on them every Sunday that he probably didn’t mean. It’s nice to teach us how to treat others and so on, but people loudly assuring others that Jesus loves them; well I have trouble believing Jesus thinks a lot of child predators and rapists myself. And I like what Jesus taught, but I don’t think everyone in the world is salvageable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        124 months ago

        I’d be curious AF what he thought about all these depictions of him as a white dude with straight, light brown hair

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          84 months ago

          I suppose it’s fair to say that some of the early artists who painted him probably never saw a brown Jew, and were handed down the stories of the Bible same as anyone, and just painted what they know. I can’t fault anyone for that, but the fact that the world very much knows better now and continues with this is obnoxious.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            54 months ago

            Close to the truth. The original use for a white Jesus was to express purity and divinity. From there, it just kind of snowballed…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 months ago

        He would probably be more annoyed at having a bunch of existing stories changed to make him the protagonist.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    224 months ago

    Don’t agree. I’m not Christian, but I would replace Jesus with Steve Jobs. Or just the apple logo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      Jobs is a bit too dated a reference. I’d probably replace what’s his face on the top left with someone more relevant, though (or Apple as you suggest, they are indeed annoying).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        The first three go into the same bag. So the fourth should also fit. Maybe an American flag? Or better yet, an AR15!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      Kinda felt the same way, but I found a middle ground solution

      spoiler

      From the movie Dogma, Buddy Christ

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Why catholics hate queers so much if Jesus was into drag?
    Some questions history can’t answer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      Fun fact. Joseph’s coat of many colors is more accurately translated as a coat with long sleeves. That likely references an outfit made from a mother’s bridal gown and passed to the daughter.

      That is: Joseph was an effiminate youngest child who didn’t do men’s work and wore women’s clothing. He was also persecuted by his brothers for it.

      He also ended up being the de facto ruler of Egypt and savior of the Jewish people.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        As fun as that fanfiction is, there is no textual evidence for the Joseph’s kitonet pasim being made from his mother’s bridal gown (especially as first marriage bridalwear was plain white cloth, something Joseph’s cloak was famous for not being.) Additionally, Joseph’s story is chronologically VERY VERY early in what wasn’t yet even Hebrew culture, so would likely bear zero resemblance to post-Canaan Hebrew culture.

        The reference to ‘long sleeves’ has to do with his brother’s jealousy at the quality and material excess of the garment. Not the source the garment was made from.

        It’s kind of bigoted of you to assume that he was gay just because his brothers picked on him.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          “Pasim” probably doesn’t mean multicolored. It can also mean long-sleeved or fine-quality, and the only other place it occurs in Hebrew scripture is when it’s referring to Tamar’s robe, where it’s described as the type of clothing worn by virgin daughters.

          • Angry_Autist (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            I can see you’re emotionally invested in this because it probably empowers some aspect of your identity, so there’s really no point in continuing.

            Some day you may understand the value of seeing clearly, I encourage you to pursue that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              Dude, it’s literally what’s written in the text.

              Just because Donny Osmund wore a multicolored robe and danced on stage doesn’t mean his portrayal was accurate to the text. The New Testament also doesn’t include Charlton Heston trying to give water to Jesus at the crucifiction.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      It’s easy, gays don’t make babies and the catholic church has run out of countries to convert. The only major growth for their faction is to force more people to have kids.

      So the Catholic Church and the GOP are on the same page of that playbook.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The drag queen Katya insists that the Pope’s tailor is gay, and that he’s into fisting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Why catholics hate queers so much

      Once you explain to a Catholic that their son/daughter can still deliver grandkids despite being queer, they come around.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    174 months ago

    Seriously Jesus. You’re a cool guy, and I know your thing is you take in the broken, but your other thing was suppose to be love. Like you said one commandment, love, and that shit is severely lacking.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      I think the person Jesus actually was loved everyone, but the trouble is conservative people hate gay people and rewrote the texts to say that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, Jesus, the historical figure was trying to reshape Judaism. He wanted to reform things and he wanted the focus to be on loving your brother. He got killed for it and he knew it would kill him because he was hanging out with the religious leaders.

        Then by a miracle he succeeded because he didnt have any transgressions against the temple and he followed Jewish teachings but was still setup to be crucified in the worst way imaginable.

        Then after that he was co-op’d for other purposes but his message is still true. Believing in christ is believing a man named Jesus lived and he was killed by no fault of his own but for the benefit of others.

        Being a Christian means you understand Christ’s message. Its real easy, love your brother, and you live in a way that reflects that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Well… A lot of their biblical evidence is less a rewrite and more of a translation issue. Take the whole Sodom and Gehmorra story about tje two angels that everyone is so keen to turn into a condemnation of the gays.

        In the OG text the words used to describe the angels were analog to genderless forms of the word “master” and because there were two of them they were always referred to by genderless they/them plural… Which is probably why there were two of them. We are probably supposed to imply the perceived gender of the angels was irrelevant to the tale.

        The first Latin and English translations off of Hebrew however used gendered terms for the two angels that coded them as male. Stuff like “Masters” “Lords” that kind of thing in large part because those societies were respectively fairly misogynistic and not primed to interpret either of the two genderless entities as possibility female coded. Then you see the anti same sex interpretation gain popularity in the case of England and France at the time they were going through a population crash via plague which caused amoung other things criminalization of same sex unions as a threat to sexual replacement of a sharply diminished population. So really we can trace this story being interpreted as God’s condemnation of the gays rather then just regular old rapists around the same time the word “sodomy” came into the lexicon in the 1300’s and the first waves of plague.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    144 months ago

    I like how the Amazing Apartheid Boy is trying to do a Trump scowl - and it manages to look just as characteristically fake as Trump’s does.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    144 months ago

    Does Musk still have a fan base? I haven’t seen anyone speak favourably of him for a very long time.