This website contains age-restricted materials including nudity and explicit depictions of sexual activity.
By entering, you affirm that you are at least 18 years of age or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from and you consent to viewing sexually explicit content.
Interesting. ASSUMING all these words in the article aren’t hollow, many colleagues do support AOC. If it wasn’t for ol’ Nancy sticking her finger in the dike this may not have been too controversial.
Problem is this reads, and probably is, a buying time sort of deal. To the old geriatric leadership AOC is a threat to how they do things. More importantly, like with Bernie, she’s a threat due to her supporters.
She would have been a direct threat to them…
That’s why instead they went with 74 year old with terminal cancer, he’s recently violated insider trading laws, he won’t go after Dems because they likely have dirt on him
Like how a new cop has to participate in stealing money/drugs before the old cops will trust them.
There has to be dirt both ways so you know they won’t snitch.
AOC hasn’t participated, so they won’t let her into leadership roles, definitely not the Oversight committee
There are a few words in this article I hope are entirely hollow
This is the exact wrong thing to be doing and not something she can compromise on