• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    866 days ago

    Citizens: please give us healthcare or infrastructure or education or help the homeless…

    Gov’t: m i s t o r b e e s t

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        That is kind of the gist of basic training though… And the military has free healthcare…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 days ago

            Yeah, I fully expect them to enshittify the military so they can hire whatever Black Water is calling themselves these days instead.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1506 days ago

    The Pentagon also approved funding for content involving YouTube star Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, who was slated to lead a humanitarian effort in Puerto Rico.

    What a headline, what an article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          386 days ago

          He puts himself first with his charitable exploitation porn. I’m sure he deserves to be a billionaire.

          • @RedditRefugee69
            link
            English
            55 days ago

            Still better than Kim Kardashian or Elon Musk.

              • @RedditRefugee69
                link
                English
                65 days ago

                That’s a silly argument. You can objectively compare virtually any two things.

                You’d really not care if someone said they’d clone Kim Kardashian or Elon Musk but you had to choose one?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  85 days ago

                  Well my diarrhea yesterday was chunky and today it’s straight liquid. Both are shit. Kinda like Mr.Beast and any of the other fame whores.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  35 days ago

                  So you’re saying the objective take that billionaires suck is less accurate than your one billionaire sucks less?

            • @YouMayBeOntoSomethin
              link
              English
              64 days ago

              Not really. He treats the people who work for him like complete garbage, denying them basic human rights during some production situations. Not just workers rights, basic human rights like water and access to their own medications.

              You have no reason to defend him.

              • @RedditRefugee69
                link
                English
                24 days ago

                Luckily I’m not.

                Saying a turd sandwich isn’t as bad for you to eat as a glass sandwich isn’t defending the turd sandwich.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          306 days ago

          Only less than the profit he made. He’s also a fraudster and abuser and deserves to be in jail.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            115 days ago

            The sweepstakes fraud is just… Rampant. I’m surprised he’s gotten away with it for so long.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      736 days ago

      He and his team figured out the YouTube algorithm. He then took the money and spend it back on production. Because there are no guidelines or regulations of YouTube videos production, he is able to use any ethical or non-ethical tactics. His videos is treated like a high budget movie where every second count.

      Companies sees his money and everyone want to get piece of the cacke so he is more visible to demographic outside of his target audience.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        266 days ago

        He also invests a lot in localisation which makes his videos appealing to non western audiences.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      He’s a bucky little fuck with dead eyes and a forced smile who practices philanthropy for clout, but up until recently you couldn’t criticize him because of the philanthropy – even when pointing out that said philanthropy is weird and immoral when it’s only being done for fame and self-promotion. Due to this paradox, he had everyone in a sort of stalemate. Fortunately, a lot has since come out about him being a sociopathic piece of human shit, so now we can kick him while he’s down.

    • DarkThoughts
      link
      fedilink
      206 days ago

      Beats me. I keep seeing his stupid ass face in search results that are completely unrelated to my search, and the sheer amount of views. I can’t even comprehend as to why people watch this ass. At least now it is somewhat known that he’s a scumbag. Unsurprisingly & unfortunately it did not seem to have any effect on his popularity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        146 days ago

        That’s an interesting thing I’ve observed–we seem to be past “cancel culture” or it only gets credit when a known scoundrel gets de-platformed. We’re in the age of too-big-to-fail celebrities. If they have a large enough base, there’s unlikely anything they can do to completely lose them or fall that far into obscurity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          116 days ago

          Cancel culture only really is a thing when the person on the receiving end is capable of feeling the tiniest shred of embarrassment/remorse for what they’ve done (not being caught). People fade into obscurity when they get “cancelled” because the massive outcry from the public convinces them they can’t ignore that what they’re doing is wrong anymore. In the case of most fascist hucksters (as well as Mr Beast), they are incapable of seeing that what they’ve done is wrong, so they can never be convinced of the need to stop

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 days ago

          We’re in the age of too-big-to-fail celebrities.

          I think there’s a certain category of net denizen that becomes a more devote fan the more it comes out that the person is a scumbag.

          Reminds me of when I argue with some members of my family and it seems like they wait for me to have a position just to take the opposite of it to be argumentative and contrarian.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I think it’s more “there’s no such thing as bad attention.”

          Any engagement compounds, and at some point, turns into money. It’s not a mystery either, it’s a systemic issue from the way people are fed information now, thanks to the engagement optimization race to the bottom.

          Celebrities can certainly fall, but it’s only if they’re boring.

        • DarkThoughts
          link
          fedilink
          56 days ago

          I don’t believe in “cancel culture” anyway. If I have issues with people, be it for their extremistic political views, or because they’re just asocial assholes, then I’m obviously not going to bother watching their content, or buy their products, whatever the case may be. That’s been just regular people behavior until the US culture war bullshit made a buzzword out of it when people didn’t put up with various MAGA people stuffing their beliefs into everyone’s face. Skip forward some years later and we reach the hypocrisy of them doing / advocating to do the same thing regarding left leaning people.

          The more concerning matter though is just how many people watch not just people who are assholes behind the camera, but in front of it, like all those “pranksters” and whatnot.

    • Blackout
      link
      fedilink
      196 days ago

      I gave his AMZ prime show a chance. After the 3rd self-sacrifice round and a bunch of lame games I couldn’t continue. Something about his smile reminds me of this but without the rack

    • qaz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Things like surviving in a nuclear bunker, surviving stranded on an island appeals to the imagination of kids. The only difference is that he actually* does it.

      *As real as a realityshow, but it’s a big difference with the usual clickbait.

      • DominusOfMegadeus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Oh. I thought he had a kids’ show. That shit appeals to MY imagination. He really does those things? Not that it matters; I can’t stand looking at his face.

        • qaz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Yes, I have no clue how he gets his videos budget but it somehow works out. I have only seen a few videos because the way it’s presented, the constant shouting, and the over the top video effects have prevented me from enjoying them.

          I did watch a recent video from Jeff Geerling in which he helped to set up the stage for a game, it was quite interesting to have a look behind the scenes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 days ago

      And yet of those listed this is a close to not a bad idea they got.

      Flavortown being the least bad is still funny though.