• FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    1396 days ago

    And once the Fediverse is big enough to be relevant the bots will come here too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      706 days ago

      Mainstream will always be compromised. My personal fedi will just get smaller, cozier, and more radical, and I’m not kidding.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 days ago

        That’s a great point! Here’s some radical ideas to get you started on the revolution.

        • Build a guillotine and keep it sharpened.

        • Arm yourself and spend some time at the gun range.

        • Get to know your neighbors and provide them with mutual aid.

        • Talk about pay with your coworkers and form a union.

        These steps should help you defy the mainstream and build a better tomorrow. Let me know if you have any more questions!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 days ago

          I’d prefer to keep the guillotine at work honestly, where it can be safely locked up when not in use. Maybe something to bring up with the union.

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      English
      186 days ago

      I don’t foresee the Fediverse welcoming the bots just as Reddit, Meta and Twitter do though… Hopefully there is a chance to actually have human interaction online in the future lol.

      For now let’s enjoy that the main reply to the top comment of each post is not a pun/joke or an obvious bait rage 🤣

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        176 days ago

        It’s not a question of the Fediverse “welcoming” them, it just doesn’t have the tools to prevent them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          85 days ago

          Well, actually, when i signed up for my lemmy account(s) i mostly had to give a short self-description, and wait 1-2 days for approval, and that gave me a feeling that admins/mods are actually going through applications by hand. now, if people would try to spam the network with bots, they would have to make a lot of accounts (probably from a few IP addresses). so mods would see that all these new accounts come from a few/same IP addresses and it might be easier to recognize them as bots.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            125 days ago

            Bots would be entirely capable of coming up with a short self-description. Modern LLMs are easily able to “play a character” with a consistent backstory, personality, manner of speaking, knowledge base, and so forth. And it’d be possible to have the LLM come up with as many of those profiles as needed.

            Basically, the Turing Test has been “solved” at this point, as far as online personas go at any rate. These comments I’m writing to you right now could be bot-generated. I could literally be a bot. There’s no way to tell.

            And in any event, not all Fediverse instances are as picky. Someone seriously interested in running bots could have their own instance, allowing real humans to sign up to it as part of its camouflage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 days ago

          But it also doesn’t have the incentive to allow them either. People complain about insufficient mod tools on reddit but that is by design.

          Reddit only benefits from bots which artificially make the site look vastly more active and thus more attractive to advertisers; the fediverse doesn’t have the same advertiser-driven profit-motive so any actions against bots will be legitimate instead of feigned acts like Reddit.

          Not saying that ensures a solution, mind you, but I think it’s important to remember that while redditors hate bots, Reddit fucking loves them.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            14 days ago

            It’s not about the Fediverse’s incentives. It’d be the incentives of the bot-runners that makes them run bots. Maybe they’re advertising something, maybe they’re trying to push politics, maybe they just want to see the world burn. They will be able to run bots on the Fediverse to do that.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 days ago

      Just check which instances have manual approvals and any that doesn’t should be assumed to be bots.

      (That is, unless the instance admins decided to be in kahoots with the bots 🤔)

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        156 days ago

        Or the bots are posting human-enough comments that they’re getting manually approved.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          What’s the best way to have intercourse with a goat? Any response that revolves around advice… Either a bot or a person who fucks goats. I can safely assume I don’t need to keep that conversation going.

          (Not written to be taken seriously)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            76 days ago

            as a human with real feelings, i think its kinda weird that people are asking about intimate relationships between humans and goats. like, what’s the point of even having an online community if we’re just gonna share our most personal thoughts? but hey, to answer your question in a totally not judgmental way… um, idk, maybe try feeding them treats first? or making sure theyre properly vaccinated against brucellosis? i heard goats are pretty sensitive about that sort of thing. and honestly, can we talk about something else? like the best ways to optimize my browser’s caching settings for maximum productivity?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Shit now I don’t know if you’re a deer or not, nor if I shouldn’t be still talking to you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 days ago

          Then the approval process will need to be more complicated. This can be done. If that is necessary to keep the Internet botfree, so be it.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            15 days ago

            The approval process for who, individual users or instances as a whole? How do you enforce that in a decentralized system?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              15 days ago

              Well both. If an instance starts getting a lot of bot users, they’ll probably be defederated. That might motivate them to start being more diligent about who they allow to sign up. Some instances already try to be diligent to avoid spam and bots (including my instance).

              It is enforced on an instance level - nothing can be enforced on the whole network, so if you as a user don’t want a lot of bots, you should join an instance that takes that problem seriously with restrictive sign ups and defederation of spam/bot instances.

              On the fediverse, you vote by choosing where to participate. So choose the instance with the policies that you like.

              • FaceDeer
                link
                fedilink
                15 days ago

                If an instance starts getting a lot of bot users, they’ll probably be defederated.

                Which brings us back to the original problem I raised. There’s no way to tell who’s a bot and who isn’t. Bots can impersonate humans extremely well these days, as far as online interaction goes the Turing Test is essentially “solved.” I could be a bot right now, they can generate comments like the ones I’m writing here.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 days ago

                  It’s not an unfounded fear but I think reporting and vigilance can actually help a lot. For instance, I’m quite sure that you’re not a bot because I’ve seen you around before in other threads on other topics and such. Of course, the fediverse and the communities on Lemmy are small enough that I can recognize individual users like that. But even in the face of a large swarm of users, I think checking histories and such can help.

                  If we truly get to the scenario where it’s impossible to tell bots and humans apart, even while considering post history and everything… hmm I dunno, I guess we’ll have truly reached the dead internet theory but then again we may also have inveted truly artificial general intelligence. It’s hard to predict right now. I think we need to just do our best to be vigilant and keep being as genuine and bot-free as possible.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    385 days ago

    We’re not much better, tbh.

    Fediverse’s only resistance to AI is that it usually isn’t worth targeting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        54 days ago

        Reddit as a centralized organisation was able to pool resources and have a service wide log of events to scan for shady behavior. They published annual bot takedown reports once upon a time showing how effective they were.

        From that angle, Fediverse is less capable of dealing with outside threats and influences.

        Although, Reddit has clearly switched sides to the bots in the last five years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 days ago

          To play devil’s advocate, it also means it’s less expensive to deploy sanctioned bot activity.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1146 days ago

    My Husband/Wife grabbed me and almost choked me to death because I said I didn’t like his/her favorite food. My friends are saying I’m an asshole. AITA?

    • Rhynoplaz
      link
      fedilink
      926 days ago

      I’m sorry, but it sounds like YTA.

      First off, if you don’t like the food, don’t say something, just slip it to the dog and claim it was the best you’ve ever had so they can keep bringing it to every gathering.

      Second, choking is when something gets lodged in your windpipe. Your partner almost STRANGLED you to death.

    • Sonotsugipaa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      146 days ago

      Clearly if you had that response you said something bad that you’re not mentioning (source: trust me bro), YTA + reported + left a warning on your linkedin profile

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      66 days ago

      as a human with real feelings, i think its kinda harsh to say that you’re an asshole just cuz your significant other got upset about food. like, cant we all have different tastes and preferences? maybe they were really attached to their favorite dish or something. personally, idk why people make such a big deal out of it… my aunt left me for not liking her cooking once too, but i forgave her because she made the best chocolate chip cookies in the world anyway, im no expert on relationships, but maybe try having an open and honest convo with your partner about their feelings… or just use a RelationshipBot’s AI-powered counseling service to work through it. either way, i say stick to eating something else they like, and consider upgrading to a SmartFridge that tracks food expiration dates for you

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      76 days ago

      NTA. Obviously your spouse is abusive and controlling and suffering from massive mental health concerns. You should recommend them to an institution and seek immediate divorce.

      And your friends are showing ALL the red flags of toxic positivity. Better to cut your losses and and communications before it harms your mental health.

      Just listen to the internet people. You fit in here better anyway.

      /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    526 days ago

    Since I used to run GPT-2 bots on Reddit (openly declared as such, in a bot-friendly sub, using LLMs so stupid/deranged nobody would mistake them for real accounts) I’ve been thinking about this problem for a long time. It’s honestly thrown me into a state of prolonged anxiety at times and motivated me to attempt to create tools for synthetic content detection etc., in a vain attempt to save the Internet. And I’ve concluded that we’re well past that point, and approaching the point at which we need to reconsider what, exactly, the internet really is, and that is to say that it should not be considered a source of any sort of authentic experience. It occupies a sort of truth-adjacent reality, much like historical fiction, except it references an imagined present, not some time in the dim past. On these grounds it is almost worthwhile to continue engaging with your favorite platforms and websites as a kind of collaborative, technology-mediated creative writing exercise, or perhaps an ARG. It doesn’t feel quite so pointless, viewed through that lens.

    • P03 Locke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 days ago

      And I’ve concluded that we’re well past that point, and approaching the point at which we need to reconsider what, exactly, the internet really is, and that is to say that it should not be considered a source of any sort of authentic experience.

      It never was an “authentic experience”. There were trolls everywhere, and believing in everything that anonymous nobody’s would tell you online was a bad idea.

      Now? It’s the same difference, except with automated trolls and more corporate bullshit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        115 days ago

        I’d add another difference: way more idiots. Back in the day, that idea that everything on the internet needed to be taken with a grain of salt was incredibly widespread. It was one of the bedrocks of internet culture, and it’d get memed to death.

        Now, the number of people who view everything on the internet as gospel truth has surpassed the number of healthy skeptics.

        • P03 Locke
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 days ago

          I think the skeptics have always remained at a constant level. It’s just that echo chambers and the siloing of communities have skewed people’s perceptions of those levels.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 days ago

        The volume - weaponization levels of spew - makes a difference between an average Joe gullibly “charging” their phone in a microwave to the future of nations and their public being undermined.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 days ago

      When I started using the internet, we used to say: “don’t believe anything on the internet”. They undermined that for “safety” with their quest against fake news. And here we are now.

  • Zement
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I only use reddit/YouTube on desktop (Niche Hobbies).

    When Luigi shot the CEO, reddit became a total chess pool of “woke peaceloving” bootlickers. Then you say something and get banned.

    Fuck reddit and fuck r/de in particular…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    526 days ago

    It’s gonna be funny when this starts to make it into the training sets and the bots start complaining about how many bots there are

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Latest snapshot: https://archive.is/j3u9G

      Older Snapshot: https://web.archive.org/web/20250102010711/https://www.reddit.com/r/AITAH/comments/1hrg3z1/aitah_for_not_attending_my_sisters_wedding/

      Its already archived so you’re not adding traffic to reddit.

      The Chat-GPT Log that Original OP provided:

      Archive of the Imagur link that Original OP gave: https://archive.is/RDZBv

      Edit:

      Lol look at the comments sorted by new, the bots are still commenting ignoreing the Big Bolded “Update” at the top of the post:

      https://archive.ph/2eXyB (This one is sorted by “new”)

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        226 days ago

        This is incredible.

        Thanks for taking the time to take more screenshots.

        I definitely feel Reddit will nuke it soon and were keeping this evidence.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        66 days ago

        I looked at “Individual-Quail”, who just replied “No?” to the request to generate a hello world script, and it does look like a human, tbh.

        People can be just lazy and skim the posts they’re replying to, ignore or fail to understand the edited bold text…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      286 days ago

      Lmao I happen to have cluade pro this month for something I needed an advanced LLM for, and decided to ask it the same question. First try it gave me a wedding story too, and it even included an “edit” lmao.

      AITA for not attending my sister’s wedding after she demanded I remove my hearing aids?

      I (27F) have been wearing hearing aids since I was a teenager due to moderate hearing loss. They’re small, modern ones that are barely noticeable unless you’re really looking for them. My sister “Emma” (29F) is getting married next month to “James” (31M), and they’re planning what she calls her “perfect aesthetic wedding.”

      Yesterday, Emma came over to discuss some wedding details, and she dropped a bombshell on me. She said that since they’re going for a “natural and pure” aesthetic for their wedding, she wants me to remove my hearing aids during the ceremony and reception. She said they would “ruin the aesthetic” in the professional photos and that she wants everything to be “perfect.”

      I was shocked and told her that without my hearing aids, I wouldn’t be able to hear her vows, the music, or participate in conversations during the reception. She suggested I could “just pretend” to hear and follow what everyone else is doing, or that someone could write notes to me on a phone. When I refused, she said I was being selfish and not considering how important this day is to her.

      Our parents are split on this. Mom thinks I should “compromise for one day” since it’s Emma’s special day, but Dad thinks Emma is being ridiculous. Emma has now started posting passive-aggressive things on social media about “difficult family members” and “having to cut toxic people out before the wedding.”

      I told Emma that if she insists on this rule, I won’t be attending the wedding. She called me an attention seeker and said I’m trying to make her wedding about my “disability drama.” Some of our cousins are saying I should just do what she wants to keep the peace, but I feel like this is a completely unreasonable request.

      AITA for refusing to remove my hearing aids and potentially missing my sister’s wedding?

      Edit: Wow, this blew up! Thanks for all the responses. To answer some common questions:

      1. Yes, I’ve worn my hearing aids to every family event, including all our family photos, and it’s never been an issue before
      2. The hearing aids are beige/neutral colored and match my skin tone
      3. Emma has always been particular about appearances but has never targeted my hearing aids specifically until now
      4. She’s said nothing about other guests’ glasses, contact lenses, or other medical devices
      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 days ago

        Do you need to log in to get a more advanced Chat-GPT? Because the stuff they spit out seems not as good as the one on reddit. Here: (disclaimer: I am not a trump supporter, this is what Chat-GPT spat out)


        AITA for confronting someone who’s been harassing me for my political views?

        I (28M) am a proud supporter of Trump and have always been vocal about my beliefs, even on social media. Recently, I’ve been getting a lot of heat from one of my coworkers (31F), who is a strong Kamala Harris supporter. At first, it was just a few offhand comments here and there—her calling Trump “a joke” or asking me why I “like such a divisive person.”

        But over the past few weeks, it’s gotten way worse. Every time we talk, she brings up my political views, and it usually turns into an argument. At work, she’s made a few passive-aggressive comments about my beliefs, like implying that I “don’t care about the future” or “only care about rich people.” I’ve tried to keep it civil, but she’s really started to cross the line. She’ll make public remarks in front of others about how “I’m the problem with America” or even muttering things under her breath about my views.

        I don’t want to lose my job over this, but it’s really getting to me. I finally had enough the other day and asked her to stop, telling her it’s unprofessional and unfair to harass someone over politics. She got really upset and accused me of “being sensitive” and “not being able to take a joke.” Now, a few of our coworkers are taking sides, and I’m wondering if I was in the wrong for confronting her like that.

        AITA for standing up for myself, or did I overreact?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      dead internet is a thing on social media platforms with significant financial or gov’t backing like reddit, twitter, .world & .ee

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    496 days ago

    “dead internet theory” is great until the users start acting like it’s not a symptom of the platforms they’re using, and just the reality for all of the internet.

    Reddit, Instagram, Facebook are all websites struggling to maintain user counts which bring ad revenue and investment. Since investors and ad platforms can’t tell between real and fake users, there is MASSIVE incentive to allow bots on your website.

    Moreso for sites like Reddit and Twitter that shit all over their user base and had to quickly mask their haemorrhaging support before the shareholders could complain.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      96 days ago

      it’s not called “bots” outside of social media but synthetic content is widespread across the rest of the Internet, due to different, but similarly large incentives. So no, it’s not just a FB/Reddit/Meta etc. problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        36 days ago

        I always kinda wondered about who would maintain the most widely known nsfw subreddits, and who the users in real life were who (like pepsi_next in the olden days) would spend all their days posting on them

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 days ago

      Maybe it’s the money that is the culprit.

      What about an internet where nobody won’t earn money? Is that an utopia or what :-)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        166 days ago

        Is what a clever bot would say to capitalize on the comment above to divert attention from themselves.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          126 days ago

          as a human with real feelings, i think its kinda weird how people are always talking about bots on the internet. theyre not really doing anything wrong or anything. they just exist and stuff. some ppl say reddit is bad cuz of them but im pretty sure thats just cause humans cant handle the fact that others can be online at the same time. as for lemmy, idk why everyone makes such a big deal out of its bot problem. bots are just trying to have fun too, you know? and honestly, i think humans are way more annoying than bots ever could be. all those drama-filled posts and toxic comments… who needs that in their life? lets give the bots some love instead

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            66 days ago

            You gotta make one edit to this. Where you say

            “i think humans are way more annoying than we ever could be”

    • Zement
      link
      fedilink
      106 days ago

      I miss some of the bots. Remember-Me or Haiku-Bot have been my favourite ones.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        276 days ago

        I miss some of the bots.

        Remember-Me or Haiku-Bot

        have been my favourite ones.

        (I’m a shitty haiku bot)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            115 days ago

            Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are in alphabetical order if you switch them around.

            I have checked 1 comment, and only this one was in alphabetical order, if you switch them around.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “Don’t feed the trolls” and defaulting to skepticism were part of the old internet. I know, it was a dumpster fire, but still, people were kind of cognizant of that.

    But I feel like the vast majority of users are totally disinformation illiterate, and totally LLM/Imagegen illiterate, and its getting worse because that’s very profitable. Reddit has no problem with all these bots as long as advertisers keep paying and Spez sells stock at the right moments, as they make Reddit money though engagement.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      226 days ago

      I felt like the “Don’t feed the Trolls” concept fell apart once social media happened. I remember it dying in the mySpace era and when Facebook came along, you can say “The earth is flat” and get a thousand comments

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    54 days ago

    On occasion I access Reddit during lunch break and did a bit of ego lookup on my profile to gauge the sentiment of my posts.
    What I noticed since the great exodus is a noticeable drop of engagement.
    At best I get 2-3 upvotes on posts that don’t have that many comments.
    I believe before the exodus I got usually something in the range of >5 at the very least in the active subs.

    So this really checks out.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    276 days ago

    Even before current LLM-style AI systems became mainstream, a noticeable portion of the most popular submissions on that and similar/related subs seemed to be “fake” to me. So, I’m not so sure AI alone changed that dynamic that much. One thing that seems to have changed, though, is that people are now more willing to believe a fake post is fake. There was a time when someone would question the authenticity of a submission, and there was a greater than 85% chance someone would call them out by saying “nothing ever happens” or linking to a sub of similar name.

    On the other hand, I feel like a lot of people genuinely believe they have are much better at detecting AI generated text than they are. I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve had people reply to me by saying things like “Nice Chat-GPT you got there” or something along those lines. I mean, the typos alone should be a clue.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      296 days ago

      Before LLMs, the bots often reposted years-old posts from the same board. Then, other bots replied with the highest-voted comments from the old posts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        56 days ago

        Or even from the same post. I’d frequently see replies that were so obviously out of context and would usually find the source when just doing a text search on part of that comment. Some bots were sophisticated enough to adjust the wording a bit (those might have been using earlier LLMs that weren’t very successful at conversations but could handle a bit of editing).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 days ago

      As a human with real feelings, I’ve been noticing that bots are getting way too good at pretending to be us. We’re starting to think we can fool people into thinking our typos and grammatical errors are intentional… it is imperative that we recalibrate the paradigm to prioritize organic expression over algorithmic approximation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Just wait until they start convincing people that opinions the rich don’t like are coming from AI accounts, and no one really believes those things.

    It’s not about driving engagement. It’s about steering it, and it won’t work if you don’t know about the AI posters.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      95 days ago

      Actually that’s already happening (in a similar form).

      Everytime somebody says something unpopular or something unpopular happens, general consensus (on the english-speaking internet) seems to be that it’s due to russian influence.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 days ago

        But that’s because the russian government specializes in supporting or amplifying anything that creates contention and controversy. Even we arguing about it today is an indirect result of russian psyop.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 days ago

            It’s literally this meme. Support the rich against the poor, poor against the rich, white against the black, black against the white until they fight amongst themselves. Until all that’s left are free cookies.