• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 hours ago

    It shall be unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material

    Genetic Material is DNA. Dry skin falling off is technically discharging genetic material. As is bleeding…

    Technically a woman would be grossly violating this with every period… or by giving birth.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 hours ago

    10k just be be able to jerk it 3 times? This guy is a loser. I’ll jerk it all day for free. He can’t charge me a fee

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 hours ago

    (4) This section shall not apply to the discharge of genetic material: … ( b ) Discharged with the use of a contraceptive or contraceptive method intended to prevent fertilization of an embryo.

    So basically it’s illegal to do so without the intent to fertilize an embryo… unless doing it as part of a contraceptive method? Isn’t abstinence - e.g. not having sex - a legitimate method?.. wouldn’t masturbation be a way to manage abstinence?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 hours ago

    (a) Donated or sold to a facility for the purpose of future procedures to fertilize an embryo;

    This means it’s legal to pull out and fill a jar to donate to such a facility.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    🤣
    SECTION 1.
    (1) This section shall be known and may be cited as the “Contraception Begins at Erection Act.”

    (2) It shall be unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo.

    (3) Upon conviction of a violation of this section, a person shall be fined:
    ( a ) One Thousand Dollars ($1000.00) for a first offense;
    ( b ) Five Thousand Dollars ($5000.00) for a second offense; and
    ( c ) Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for a third or subsequent offense.

    (4) This section shall not apply to the discharge of genetic material:
    ( a ) Donated or sold to a facility for the purpose of future procedures to fertilize an embryo; and
    ( b ) Discharged with the use of a contraceptive or contraceptive method intended to prevent fertilization of an embryo.

    SECTION 2.
    This act shall take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 2025

    • Nomecks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 hours ago

      Shit, I vomited without intent to fertilize an embryo

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 hours ago

      I know its Mississippi but this guy has to realize this targets women with a bias. Men: “Don’t masturbate or have sex for fun!”… Damn that sucks… Women: “Don’t masturbate or have sex for fun!.. oh and don’t ever release an egg again”. Wait I cant exist as a woman pre menopausal? Nope

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        That and I would worry that if people took it too seriously, it could lead to a lot more rape.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Unfortunately, since their joke is badly written, it might be interpreted has you said. Yet, please notice, with the title of this law ( “Contraception Begins at Erection Act” ) that it is targeting was supposed to target men.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Both the clitoris and the nipples can become erect. (I know it’s a joke but I can help but smile thinking of an erect clitoris) Lol

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 hours ago

            Yes it’s fun to look at this joke in different ways and to think of how it could be written in much better ways.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3313 hours ago

    Sure, some may say it’s absurd, but masturbation inspector is a good paying, high quality American job that cannot be exported overseas, and not a job I’d trust to AI.

    That state senator is a visionary!

  • djsoren19
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9817 hours ago

    If the Democrats aren’t going to be useful, I’m glad they’ve at least decided to be a little funny.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 hours ago

      It’s a race to the bottom now. And the Republicans have a huge head start. Dems are nosediving to catch up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    To highlight how absolutely stupid this bill is, it sounds like it would outlaw menstruation and nocturnal emissions.

    Land of the free.

    Edit: it sounds like this is intentionally facetious to point out the absurdity of other pro-life bills.

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I didn’t see the party of the politician in the article, so no idea if it is written in jest or just regular old Republican whackiness.

    The most entertaining part is that it is written as applying to men, but as written it is gender neutral and would penalize menstruation.

    Edit: It is a Dem having a lark.

    • @RedditRefugee69
      link
      English
      36 hours ago

      You can vote against a bill you introduce. Look at Moscow Mitch.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      615 hours ago

      i’m afraid that the fascists would take the bill up and actually vote to ban masturbation. especially the bible thumpers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 hours ago

        There are a number of active laws that were rendered unconditional by Lawrence v. Texas. In addition to the anti-sodomy laws, this invalidated most laws restricting sex toys.

        Lawrence was explicitly called out as being on the chopping block in the Jackson decision, so these are slated for a comeback. The only real limitation is that SCOTUS needs a case, and the challenger needs to show standing.