Signature /= footer

Resist

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1281 month ago

    This is so stupid. I know plenty of cishet people who include their pronouns in their sig because they have a gender neutral name.

        • nocturne
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          That is why I do it three!

          My name tag at work also has my pronouns on it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Of course it’s daft to mandate what people can and can’t put in their email footers but I don’t get why people put pronouns in footers.

        I’m cis male and he/him. Others can call refer to me as it/them or she/her if they wish.

        I dislike bananas but I don’t put that in my email footer.

        I haven’t seen it in a while anyway. I thought it was a fad from the late 10s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Ok, me and everyone else who doesn’t publish their preference for bananas in their footer I guess.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Is your dislike of bananas an important part of your identity, both personally and how you are treated by society at large? Does making it known that you dislike bananas either verbally or through your appearance lead to a realistic possibility of facing abuse and opression, not limited to potential loss of livelihood or life?

              If not, perhaps, you can see how the two things aren’t very comparable.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                No, but how people refer to me in the third person is also not an important part of my identity.

                Someone’s choice of the pronoun to assign to me says more about them and the nature of our relationship than it says about my identity.

        • Sas [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          430 days ago

          “I don’t care about misgendering” says person of the always assumed gender.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            130 days ago

            I think that’s kind of reductive honestly.

            Like most people I try not to be an ass, and generally try to get through the day without offending anyone.

            If I know someone well enough to care about their gender obviously I’d do my best not to misgender them.

            OTOH if I’m emailing customer support to ask where my order is I just couldn’t care less what the person’s gender is.

            • apotheotic (she/her)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              329 days ago

              A persons right to identity is not dependant on how much you care about the interaction, or any other factor. Say you have to escalate the customer support ticket, and you want to say “your colleague X was helping me. He said X was not possible blah blah” this is easier if those pronouns have been visible to you, you don’t have to make an assumption or default to gender neutral pronouns which may not be appropriate depending on the individual.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                129 days ago

                I’m not imposing of anyones right to identity and frankly to suggest otherwise in any professional context would just be silly.

                Like a great many people I send and receive emails all day, corresponding with people from all sorts of organisations.

                An infinitesimal portion of people include pronouns in footers, and I suspect the people who do are cisgender with vanilla pronouns.

                I get that I’m the only one here being blunt about it, and I’m happy to take the downvotes, but honestly how does anyone navigate the day to day without imposing on people’s “right to identity” if no one is announcing their pronouns in their email footers?

                The obvious answer is, very few people care very much about this.

                • apotheotic (she/her)
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  329 days ago

                  Why would you assume that the people who have their pronouns on display are cisgender? That’s baffling

                  Trans people, like myself, put their pronouns on display so that they can avoid being misgendered in the exact way I’ve described to you.

                  The only cis people, I’d imagine, who bother to do the same are people who are doing it in allyship with trans folk.

                  Very few people care very much about this

                  Sure, okay, yeah. And the people who do care, put their pronouns there for you to respect.

                  Quite frankly, if an infinitesimal set of your emails even include pronouns in the footer to begin with, why is it such a bugbear for you?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          I know a guy who saw skin tone bandages at a school and lost his mind. He ranted about it for days. People I know still refer to him as the “skin tone bandage guy”

          Believe it or not, there are a number people who are “upset at pronouns in email guys” who lose their minds over this and its actually a public service to identify people with anger issues before they do real harm

          This is why those policies exist. If everyone has their pronouns in their bio/email, the people with uncontrolled anger issues don’t have clear targets.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            128 days ago

            Assuming everyone with an opinion contrary to your own has uncontrolled anger issues is probably a pathology. Maybe get that looked at.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              128 days ago

              There’s no assumptions. The guy was red faced and ranting for days over. Because he saw bandaids marketed at diversity.

        • apotheotic (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          130 days ago

          Its awesome that you use any/any pronouns but some people have massive feelings of gender dysphoria from being misgendered. I understand it can be difficult to relate to an experience you’ve never had, but it is a real experience and shouldn’t be minimised.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Eggs costing a lot is a good thing. Fossil fuels too. Switch to something better for the climate

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    771 month ago

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why they care about someone’s sexual orientation or their pronoun.

    I ran the numbers on sex changes and it’s like .001 of the population. It’s a non-issue.

    The real issues are homelessness, inequality, Internet privacy, poisons in our food and workers’ rights…

    Not fucking pronouns.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 month ago

      For the life of me, I can’t understand why they care about someone’s sexual orientation or their pronoun.

      They don’t. It’s classic divide and conquer tactics to package up the general population into nice bite-sized chunks that they can destroy individually with minimal resistance from the others. Exact same shit is how the Nazis rose to power.

    • Rozaŭtuno
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 month ago

      They don’t care. The tactic is to have a minority that you can blame for all the bad things.

      100 years ago it was the jews secretly running the world, today it’s the evil trans people and immigrants conspiring to destroy The West™.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      Got to distract from the real issues somehow. Gotta keep that wealth extraction and concentrating system of exploitation alive. Can’t have the slave rising up to overthrow their masters again…

    • ArchRecord
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Two core reasons:

      1. Demonization. They need someone to demonize, that distracts voters and the general populace away from their own misdeeds, and lack of functional policy. If you’re too busy getting angry at the trans people, you won’t strike against the Billionaires.
      2. Insecurity. If the world isn’t actually as simple as you thought, your entire ideology is based on putting people into given labels and boxes to make your life easier, idealizing a nonexistent past, etc, then the world changing in any non-standard way is seen as something to be extremely afraid of. This is also what drives their concerns over immigrants (“replacing” their community’s racial dynamic), homeless people (“not wanting to work” like they did), climate change (this couldn’t possibly happen because then the industries and consumption you had your whole life would have to change), progressive education and scientific growth (learning new things about how what we used to think was wrong), etc. It’s all rooted in just wanting things to stay the same.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      230 days ago

      Well, eggs are back to $1 a dozen and everyone has housing and excellent healtcare coverage, so you can focus on renaming gulfs and prosecuting minorities…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      They need an ‘enemy’ to rally people against and all the usual suspects are no longer politically expedient

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      230 days ago

      They don’t care, they just need an other to blame to get everyone scared of.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      https://thenewinquiry.com/the-scapegoating-machine/

      Peter Thiel has many times loudly stated his goal since 9/11: Create scapegoats so the public has somebody to blame for their suffering and his fervent belief this will keep billionaires safe. My guess is most billionaires see it this way.

      if you want to see a way to defeat this idea look up Thiel’s interview with Piers Morgan after Luigi Mangione allegedly killed Brian Thompson

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I, too, dislike being employed.

      But seriously most people will not risk their livelihood for it. It is almost guaranteed to end up in court like so many other of Trump’s bullshit policies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        They’re getting fired eventually anyway, they had pronouns in their sig in the first place.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Got a source for that, or are you making up your own inflamatory “facts” again?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            …Trump offered all federal employees 7 months salary to quit. He signed two executive orders today to unilaterally dissolve some federal agencies.

            You logically cannot believe hes not in his night of long knives period. Someone with the care to put pronouns in their work communication isn’t loyal to Trump, and thus logically wouldn’t survive the firing and agency shutdowns Trump is currently actively doing.

            I get you disliked China and Chinese people but are you really letting that poison your logic to the point you’re ignoring reality. Is your insistence that Chinese people are wrong in all things worth not paying attention to the half dozen executive orders a day which is actively getting the US government?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              So no. Just more lies and distortions. Trump is plenty bad without making up lies.

              My antipathy is towards those who, like you, consistently advocate for the authoritarian CCP, whilst also trying to incite people against their own governments.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                I quite literally lied about nothing. I’m sorry you don’t have access to any mainstream news sites in the US, or any commentators for us news.

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 month ago

    Does that include Mr. Mrs. and other gendered titles?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 month ago

    Doesn’t go far enough, remove pronouns from the email body too.

    To it may concern. Notice did not complete task before deadline. Please can provide update? Look forward to reply.

  • ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    And yet again, the Tangerine Palpatine is focusing on stupid shit.

    Farmers unable to gather their harvest? The working and middle classes being squeezed into oblivion? Grocery prices skyrocketing? Unknown drones taunting our military bases? Military helicopters colliding with commercial jets?

    Nah, none of that stuff matters! Instead we just focus on fucking pronouns in emails!

    What an absolute fucking joke.

    Edit: fixed a typo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      Nah, none of that stuff matters!

      No, not to him, that’s the point.

      How much more deliberate in their oppressing and exploiting do those in power need to be before people stop expecting any different?

      They’re there to serve themselves, not society

  • oleorunOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 month ago

    What about the people who often have DDoD, OCIS, NCIS, CCNA, CCNP, A+, Ph.D, MA, MBA, BA, BS, K12, SCRUMDIDDLYUMPTIOUS after their names? Can we get rid of title abuse then never focus on pronouns?

    • ThePowerOfGeek
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      App can go except for “SCRUMDIDDLYUMPTIOUS”. Because that one is SCRUMDIDDLYUMPTIOUS!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Man, I spent a lot of money and time for my post-nominals, I don’t care if they’re 100% irrelevant to what I do, they’re getting used in every god damn email.

      (Helps that I only have one, though. And to be clear, I am happy to vehemently argue this point for months/years to steal focus from pronouns).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 month ago

    Sorry to all the Blakes, Dylans, Ashleys, Francises, Shannons, Frankies, Charlies, Rorys, Blairs, Leslies, Angels, Billies, Sams, Kellys, Danas, Harleys, Adins, Caseys, and all the other non-binary/gender neutral names that I can’t think of right now.

    -signed a person with a non-binary name

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 month ago

        Even for gender cishet people a Dylan, Casey or Sam might be a “he/him” or “she/her” and its just not obvious from the name.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            141 month ago

            So?

            Does that mean all have to waste time with pronouns?

            Can think of only one time thought a female was a male from name. Was not a problem. The name was Noel

            Seems like the name argument is no argument at all

            Sounds good ma’am. Have a great one

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            we, our, and I are all pronouns. Yes, we pretty much need to use pronouns.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            waste our time with pronouns?

            What does this even mean?

            Why use pronoun when no pronoun do trick?

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This would make a great pronoun or title attached to your name. Sign off every email with …

      John Doe
      Jesus Fucking Christ

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        I sometimes wish I were petty enough to legally change my last name to be she-her (i don’t think that slashes are allowed?l

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 month ago

    Small government regulating pronouns in worker’s email signatures.

    Regulations For Thee but Not for Me

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 month ago

    MAGA voters couldn’t identify a pronoun in high school. How are they supposed to figure it out now?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 month ago

    Does that mean no-one can call him ‘President’ Trump or ‘Mr’ President any more?

  • H Ramus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 month ago

    The communist leader of northern Venezuela is mandating how to conduct your business, how to write, how to speak.

    Party of small government, rule of law and free markets.

    • Steve Dice
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Mexican here. We’re Northern Venezuela. We’ll let you have Northern Cuba.