• lmmarsano
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yang botched it by chaining = wrong.

    100 − 10 = 90 + 9 = 99

    ❌ cringe

    100 − 10 = 90
    90 + 9 = 99

    ✔️ based

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Don’t they teach math in the US anymore? Or do you get a pass on basic subjects if you are on the football team?

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yeah he totally cooked Yang. That guy has NO IDEA where the 9 came from.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Just noticed if you also decrease something by 10%, then increase by 10%, you also get a net loss of 1. Math itself is biased towards loss.

    Anyone convinced in the malevolent creator theory yet?

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is clearly about the US stock market crashing. In that case it’s always the days gain/loss, in which case Yang is the only person who is right.

      This is important because a lot of people saw “down 10%” and now “up 10%” without realizing that’s still day over day loss.

  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 day ago

    TBF Yang really did write the equation in the sloppiest way possible.

    Like I know what he MEANS but no math professor in the world would let this shit slide.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Yeah if you put it:

      100 - (100 x 0,1) = 90

      90 + (90 x 0,1) = 99

      It comes quite obvious. And I know the brackets are redundant, but my coder mind forces brackets to all math formulas for readability.

      Was it on purpose, maybe.

      • lmmarsano
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Decimal commas ain’t 'merican: you’d totally throw them with your weird euro math.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Even

        100 - 10% = 90

        90 + 10% = 99

        Works better than what he did, because that’s how you’d enter it on a standard calculator.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          100 - 10/100 ≠ 90

          I’m not a fan of this at all and wish people would treat percentages as if they were a unit. x% is x of y per 100 total.

          x% = x yi / 100 ytotal

          Where yi is the species in question.

          My cup is 90% full: My cup contains 90 unitswater / per 100 unitscup

          This is why I don’t like Baker’s percentages. I guess it makes sense, because it’s still per cent, but they’re mixing the meaning used practically everywhere else these days.

          50% water for baking isn’t 50 unitswater / per 100 unitsdough, it’s 50 unitswater / per 100 units**flour**. In my mind that means you have 33.33% hydration, not 50%…

          Just feels weird to not express that as a ratio. But I guess it’s a shorthand that works for them :/

          • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yes I understand all that but I’m telling you standard calculators literally work that way.

            Just launch the calculator app on your phone or computer and give it a try, you’ll see.

            • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              This is very upsetting

              Thanks for the heads-up. I would have been happier never knowing haha

              The implied brackets. THE IMPLIED BRACKETS!! The horror.

              Thanks for the response kind soul

              • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                No worries. Yeah I get that it’s a bit weird if you know how to do it properly but it’s actually a fairly helpful trick for quickly calculating discounts, which I assume is the indented use. Remember, calculators were designed for lazy business folks who suck at math.

                This is exactly how someone who failed HS math would think about the problem, and conveniently, it just works.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Um you can type like that into a calculator? Any answers please specify an actual calculator vs computer.

          • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Sure can.

            And yes I was stunned as well when I learned it, because that’s not how it’s taught in schools. I used to do exactly what the previous commenter did, and then one day I saw some illiterate mouthbreather type it in like that and I was like “nuh-uh, that’s not how that works, gimme that thing and let me show you.” And I typed it in the long and “correct” way, and whaddayaknow? Same result.

            But it makes sense when you think about it, calculators were literally invented for business use (and most business people are notoriously bad at math), and one of the most common uses in business is figuring out how much something should cost after applying a discount.

              • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                It works on both. I tried the calculator apps on iOS and Windows and they both worked that way. And if you still have a regular old digital calculator, it should work on that too.

              • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Both? The cheap simple calculators I used decades ago would work if I typed 1 then 0 then 0 then - then 1 then 0 then %. Granted, I have experience with maybe 3 calculators in my life, so I might have just gotten lucky.

      • OCATMBBL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Readability is important. I do the same thing, because just because something is technically correct doesn’t mean there isn’t a better way to do it. I’m very pro-bracket.

  • klu9@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 day ago

    Some bureaucrats in Mexico City tried this years ago.

    An important ring road had two lanes in each direction. To increase its capacity, they didn’t actually widen the road; they just repainted the lane markings to turn two lanes into three, and claimed a 50% capacity increase!

    Everyone immediately screamed about being crammed together just centimetres apart, accidents increased and the city officials quickly u-turned; they repainted to have just 2 lanes in each direction again.

    But they then tried to claim that as that was a 33% decrease, and that because they had earlier increased it 50%, that meant they had achieved a net 17% increase in the road’s capacity!

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not even close to that anyway, the dow jones for example went from 44k to 37k back up to 40k. Still hasn’t even regained half the value it lost.

  • dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I might as well throw the same comment in here. You learn this pretty quickly when you bet on meme stocks. Down 90% then up 100% I can assure you, you are no where near where you started.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same with crypto. You’ll get a notification something went down 10%, then up again 10%, but if you zoom out you see it’s just been slowly going down on average since the last huge spike.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    pegglegg back in fifth grade: ‘why i need to learn this math stuff. i aint never gunna use it’

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        you still need to know what buttons to push on the magic box, and in what order…

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            “It’s not like you’ll regularly have a little box in your pocket with access to the sum of all of the knowledge in the world but you’ll have to sift through an equal amount of incorrect knowledge and have the ability to differentiate the two.”

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That kind of math didn’t start for me until letters started showing up in it. This is basic shit though!

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s only the same if it’s up 10% compared to the original number. It all depends on your time period, you could be up 30% compared to 7 years ago.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tesla stock prices are good example of this. They are down ~50% since december and up ~70% since lowest point in april last year.