• OscarRobin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Transmission is awesome because it’s simple. It only does what you need and has the best UI for doing so.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m caught between the dual urges of “reject tierlist, embrace tradition” and “I’ve been sleeping on over a decade of FOSS torrent client development, maybe it’s time to up my game”.

      • oddspinnaker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I will say, as someone who used rTorrent some time ago to automate torrent downloading and whatnot, it was awesome. I’m glad to see it still going and gaining popularity.

        Stable software doing its job out of the way is what I want.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Given the community we’re in, majority of us are power users and transmission is just way too feature light for most of us

      • pascal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        if the community we’re in puts rtorrent in C tier because it’s “UNIX only” then you and I have a different meaning of “power users”.

        • wahming@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Given I was replying to a comment in a totally different context, sure, whatever floats your boat.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Being a power user does not automatically mean you need to use Linux. Not trying to defend any other OS out there, just don’t like this gate keeping attitude.

          • pascal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Being a sports car enthusiast does not automatically mean I hate Lamborghini because I own a Ferrari.

            You are totally right, what I mean is you don’t have to use Linux to be a power user, but despise it it’s not a power user attitude.

        • wahming@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m supposed to use an extra program to download a torrent in sequential order?

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Depends why you want it. If you want it to reduce fragmentarion, then just enable fallocate. If you want it to download files in sequence, then XML RPC. If you want file to be downloaded in very inefficient way, then be patient.

            • wahming@monyet.cc
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Or, I just right click and select sequential download so I can start watching a movie immediately. This logic of breaking everything down into the tiniest possible bits is how we ended up with ridiculousness like the lpad debacle.

              • uis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Well, torrent client should leech and seed very fast and very efficient, watching videos is not on this list. XMLRPC also makes it convenient and expandable.

                And sequential downloads are bad for swarm, please don’t do this.

                • wahming@monyet.cc
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Just because your use case is different from others does not invalidate all other use cases.

                  Also, there’s a reason no clients support sequential download as a default option. Having the very occasional download where I would like to start watching immediately upon starting the download is not going to break the swarm, or even affect it.

    • Opeth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      And if you wanna put on your naughty shoes you can theme transmission just drag flood-ui files in and tada

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    qBittorrent is indeed the best, but ranking Transmission so low just screams edgy kid trying to dislike the “normie” alternative.

      • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I disagree, qbitorrent is better. Had problems with transmission in my arr docker VM.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s lthe only one I’d use but…

      It really is lacking basic functionality. Hell, o can’t even order torrents that are currently running by size or % done, which would be really helpful if it existed

      Also, I don’t think it’s actively developed anymore, I haven’t seen an update in its functionality in at least 5 years, maybe even 10

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Transmission is good precisely because it does one thing and one thing really well - download torrents. No other crap, spam and non-related garbage required.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It does not do it very well (no sequential downloads, tracker scanning etc) and others like qBitTorrent also do not come with spam nor unrelated garbage, only μTorrent does that.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I get what you mean, but none of those downsides to Transmission are just “downloads torrents”. So yes, it does do that very well, outside of special circumstances…

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It always downloads everything at the same time and it doesn’t find extra trackers, both cause it to download worse.

          So no, it doesn’t actually do that one thing very well.

  • Vub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    rTorrent “UNIX only” and c-tier. That says all you need to know about this list.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      UNIX only has vague meaning. BSD is true UNIX, Darwin is butchered UNIX, Windows has POSIX compatibility enviroment(cygwin), Linux is POSIX.

      • Vub@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        That was my point. Also BSD is not true Unix, it is Unix-like. Only Unix is Unix.

        • leap123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The original BSD is based on Unix so you could say it’s “true Unix”, but modern BSD systems has modified the source code so much that almost every code is now more different original Unix so you could say it’s “Unix-like”.

          Illumos in the other hand is actually true Unix as it’s based on Solaris which is based on Unix System V.

  • GenBlob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have seen this same image circulated for years. We need a new one because transmission in D tier is unacceptable.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah “it does nothing but downloads torrents” is the selling point. It’s the reason I exclusively use Transmission.

    • FartsUnited@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Transmission used to be my preferred app hands down but recent updates have negatively impacted its performance on my end. If all it needs to do is download torrents, why does it now sometimes seem incapable of connecting to a given (popular) swarm ?

      Particularly unfortunate is that once it does connect, the download speed has now become arbitrary: it keeps alternating between ‘incredibly fast’ and ‘surprisingly slow’ and takes three or four times as long to complete. I’ve become so exasperated with it that I’ve been forced to move on (deluge instantly connects and consistently downloads at five times the speed).

  • Tau@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Transmission as a server is very good and lightweight, specially if you pair it with something like Flood and the *arr apps

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      very bad at stuff like having set seed times before removing torrent, which is nice with qbittorrent

    • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve had an issue on a recent install in an LXC where it consumed more memory over time until a reboot. It hasn’t really been an issue yet, but I will have to investigate and maybe switch to another webgui client.

  • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is out of date and Deluge is S tier.

    It was rewritten and 2.0 came out in 2022 to address the slowdown issues when seeding a thousand plus torrents

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    qbittorrent all the way :)

    I love the built in http server for remote control. It’s literally a clone of the desktop window with all the same controls/options.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Is there an equivalent to “thin client” mode of Deluge, where you can connect the desktop version to a server and control it as if it was a local install, but the server does all the legwork?

      It really makes the whole thing seamless.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That would require installing client software though, no?

        Qbit is just a web app accessible from anything with a browser. (I keep mine behind a vpn for auth, but it’s got http form based password auth aswell.)

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It does, but it feels more integrated. Clicking a magnet link or opening a torrent file is handled natively by the OS and pass it over to the native app, which talks to the Deluge server if used in thin client mode. It’s really neat.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Fair.

            I rarely manage torrent files/links anymore. I tend to do manual searches via Prowlarr and just use the interface to monitor progress.

        • 8ender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I dunno maybe it’s just gimmicky but it feels so nice to have a desktop app over and webui that still uses the server. I use Deluge for only that reason

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s one of the only things you can’t do via the web app, but there is a ‘torrent creator’ under the ‘tools’ menu. I haven’t used it though so I can’t really say how good it is.

  • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 years ago

    This post made me nostalgic for the days when uTorrent was the shit. Man, how the mighty have fallen.

    • ArtificialLink@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Qbit has been around almost as long and has almost always been better. Qbit got apl the nostalgia i need lol

  • Morgikan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Transmission is probably one of the best clients to use in a headless setup. I think it usually ranks lower because it doesn’t do a lot of things for you. What it does it does well, but nothing beyond that. Technically there is network binding, but by IP address and not interface. That means you have to script it which I know most people aren’t going to want to do. As far as searching, again you have to rely on other services that probably do it better anyway. Still I rank it alongside qbittorrent. It just takes a less user or beginner friendly route.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      I use it specifically for headless because of the convenience of many pre-made docker containers set up to use a VPN with Transmission.

  • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everyone sleeping on qBittorrent with the search plugin enabled. I never have to go to websites ever again, I can just pull from various domains with one search built into the program.

    • dai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yep my other packages manage everything else, transmission is rarely logged into on the GUI side. KISS

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just the option to not have the new torrent dialog pop up every time is reason enough for me. And just proper sorting. And quick content overview.