U.S. President Donald Trump, in an interview with NBC News on Saturday, said there would be “serious consequences” if billionaire Elon Musk funds Democratic Party candidates to run against Republicans who vote for Trump’s sweeping tax-cut bill.

Trump declined to say what those consequences would be in the phone interview, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Musk.

Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, “I would assume so, yeah.”

  • decapitae@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because in a functional democracy, threatening opposition is encouraged and often leads to a healthy society. /s

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      He’d sorta have a point about people shouldn’t be able to just dump a few millions on elections to influence them, but since Elmo did literally that for trump it’s not only too late, it’s also hypocritical as shit

      Which makes sense because for Republicans it’s always them accusing Democrats of what they are doing themselves

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not worried about the hypocrisy here. I couldn’t give a f*** about Trump being hypocritical. But I care an awful lot that he’s threatening to do something terrible to someone he considers a political opponent.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The fact that a billionaire bought an election and can easily buy it again is so plain for all to see and it is repugnant. The rich shouldn’t be.

  • mossberg590@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Musk is going to fund Republican candidates in the primaries, non-MAGA Republicans. The idea he would fund Dems is laughable. It will be interesting to see which way the Republicans go, money or MAGA.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Non maga repugs are terrified of Trump and won’t sand up to him though, there’s no reason to fund them either

  • evenglow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump doesn’t want to get blamed when Democrats start winning elections. If it happens Musk will gloat for credit and the finger pointers will say Trump should not have pissed off Musk.

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    And, since the Supreme Court has ruled money = speech with the Citizens United ruling, Trump has just set Elon up for a First Amendment case if anything happens. One that the taxpayer will likely foot the bill to defend.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Threatening action as a government official is taking an action. Under the rules of CU, he has standing. Then again, the Roberts court doesn’t care about stare decisis or the letter of the law or the spirit of the law, just what can keep the grift flowing.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          ok? still, that’s how you got into this, with people checking out. i didn’t say you did, since it wouldn’t make sense after you said you wanted to check out now. my point is that these cunts want to tire people enough to make them check out so they can do whatever they want without any pushback.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              dude, go fuck yourself. this is a public thread. if you don’t want comments don’t make public comments online.

                • pyre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  the what? what does being a hero have to do with anything? and “someone’s upset” is rich coming from the dude who immediately took things personally and started cursing defensively.

  • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m sure billionaires will be funding Democrats hard, which is why we need to treat the party like neo-feudalists from now on. No matter what they say, they cannot be trusted to do anything but further raid the working class. They’re more of a long term enemy than Trump, and we cannot give them an easy time. They will never be saviors, only new masters.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      they actually fund both, but they fund the gop more when they can get tax cuts, or thier investment wont get taxed to hell.

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The game is fundamentally different now in a worse way. We’re looking at a future of neo feudal politicians once this fascist flame burns through the nation. The end of the US as a unified whole is a genuine possibility. Feudalists gaining control and creating a hellish dystopia with the power of the empire is the alternative. Post Trump America will be never be as successful a liberal democracy as 2024 America was, and 2024 America was absolutely bottom of the barrel.

        America needs to burn and probably will, but that will more likely to be awful than not. It will be a monumental lift to bring about a positive future.

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    We’ve had the quiet dictatorship. But what about the loud one?