• SnausagesinaBlanket
    link
    fedilink
    1549 months ago

    I have enough to last 8 months after working 45 years and having a heart attack and having to spend my life savings on medical bills.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          209 months ago

          What a strangely hostile response to a perfectly reasonable question. If you don’t want people to comment on what you say, you really shouldn’t participate.

          • PatFusty
            link
            fedilink
            189 months ago

            Is them saying 45 years of working not enough? If they would have thought their job mattered they would have said that. You guys are just horny to say they did something wrong and they are cutting you off.

            • SnausagesinaBlanket
              link
              fedilink
              159 months ago

              You guys are just horny to say they did something wrong and they are cutting you off.

              Nailed it!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              It is interesting that you assume that people are looking to break this person down, it really comes off as projection. In fact, we are curious about the type of job he had because that changes things. If he was a government employee, then retirement is required. If he was in public sector, then what you get will depend on employer. If you’re a contractor, then it is fully up to you to put money into it. We have no idea who this person is or what their experiences are like. Assuming the worst from us says more about you than anything.

              • PatFusty
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                Are you shidding and farding about what I said enough to send me 2 messages on this?

                🚨Creep alert 🚨

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              You’re projecting. I actually don’t care about the person or their story, but noticed someone have a little temper tantrum when someone asked a question in response.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            159 months ago

            It wasn’t that hostile. And they never said people couldn’t comment, that’s a straw man you built entirely on your own.

          • SnausagesinaBlanket
            link
            fedilink
            139 months ago

            you really shouldn’t participate

            Participate in posting my personal work history which as zero to do with this thread and would do nothing to add to it except to invade my privacy? Ok Chief.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            59 months ago

            Clearly the guy is ashamed of his job for the majority of his life and the reason he didn’t want to share it is probably the reason they let themselves get stuck there for decades.

            It’s a shame more people don’t accept help from others even in the form of discussion

            • SnausagesinaBlanket
              link
              fedilink
              169 months ago

              |Clearly the guy is ashamed of his job for the majority of his life and the reason he didn’t want to share it is probably the reason they let themselves get stuck there for decades.

              I was never stuck at any job and when I had my Heart Attack I was doing quite well.

              Lmao.

              What help>? To be criticized for not owning Apple stock?

              Get over your disappointment of not being able to pry into my life,

              and go get one yourself.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You’ve hit it on the head and all the naysayers here are just being oppositional. This is sort of like that fake Libertarian rage you see periodically.

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            You could say the same thing about this comment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        179 months ago

        It’s unclear why people took exception to that question. Retirement is commonly tied to your type of employment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 months ago

      Did you have retirement savings before the heat attack? How about insurance with a max you’d have to pay?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1339 months ago

    Regular Americans are struggling to survive in a nightmare dystopia. News and weather at 11.

    Not surprising that a lot of boomers got left behind. The American system is designed to grind everyone to zero with overwhelming debt to keep everyone working at nonliving wages.

    Making sure income can’t match debts is a form of wage slavery. Company towns with mines back in the day. This current “economy” is that bullshit on steroids.

    • FenrirIII
      link
      fedilink
      219 months ago

      Marketing and the media are also to blame. We’re constantly bombarded by advertising and people telling us that what we have isn’t enough. We’re so status conscious and aware if how much is out there that they have us chasing dreams straight into massive debt.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        149 months ago

        I’m in my 50s with no savings. It isn’t lifestyle or marketing driven though. I just have had very few years where we had any extra. Also three teenagers and the price of food is killing me, cost of cars too. It’s just surviving that’s gutting me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 months ago

          “It isn’t lifestyle”

          “Also three kids”

          You do realize having 3 kids was a choice right? Some of us choose no kids and can’t afford shit still

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            It’s still a bad argument. You should be able to have kids and not starve. The fact that people choose no kids and still starve shows how fucked things are. We are all fighting the same fight, though our positions may be different.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            A society in which the poor can’t afford 3 kids and retirement savings is a failed society. I’m not one of those birth rates people but you absolutely should be able to afford to have the replacement rate number of children

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 months ago

        Companies spend millions of dollars to influence your behavior and have mountains of studies to prove that it works, but it’s your fault if you’re swayed by advertising.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Those its “my money and I need it now!” commercials…devious now that a lot of folks dont have anything saved.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    779 months ago

    For some fucked up reason SS tax is only up to something like $165k income. So a textbook regressive tax. Ridiculous. Don’t put a limit on it. There. The shit is funded until climate change creates starvation and mass human migrations of such size that there is a break down the social structure.

    • TheWoozy
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Aktchually… SS benefits are pretty progressive. Those with lower lifetime earnings will see a much higher income replacement percentage than higher earners up to that $165k-ish limit.

      Lifting the taxable income cap would not fully eliminate the funding gap. We’d also have to pay out more to those higher earners too. If we didn’t, it would change SS from insurance to wellfare. And that would lead to (Republican) lobbiests fighting even harder to privatize, limit, or end SS.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        Benefits may be progressive but the funding is regressive. Actually enduring the prerequisite significantly harder life? Also regressive.

        Lifting the cap would increase funding.

        It is welfare regardless, but lifting the cap and then paying the extra revenue out to people who don’t need it would not do much, so good call there.

        We are perfectly capable of taking care of one another, so technical explanations of why people actually have to suffer because yacht construction stimulates GDP are inherently suspect.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Plus don’t forget there are special rules for taxing social security benefits, where most recipients are not taxed but as your income increases, more of your benefits are subject to income tax. Also quite progressive.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    699 months ago

    That’s because DEMOCRATS keep trying to SAVE Social Security! Why can’t we just GIVE that money to BILLIONAIRES instead like REPUBLICANS want to do?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    539 months ago

    I put money into my 401k for decades only to find out I had enough to cover two months of rent. Shits fucked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      739 months ago

      Were you putting in a nickel per paycheck? The market has killed it over the last 30 years, even with a relatively low contribution, if you contributed consistently for 30 years you should have way more than that

        • DearOldGrandma
          link
          fedilink
          529 months ago

          Either you weren’t contributing for decades, or you literally only contributed $10-$20/mo for ~30 years. If your job provides a 401k option, with tax write-offs and everything else you should have been contributing a lot more to maximize its future utility. This is assuming your employer wasn’t even matching.

          Either you aren’t telling us the full details, or you haven’t fully been contributing for decades.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                https://lemmy.world/comment/8024551

                I don’t even know what that is, man. I worked, I didn’t play with stocks.

                4th option confirmed. Everyone that has a 401k in some capacity, and isn’t sure how they work, please go check your 401k elections right now. It isn’t really “playing stocks” but just putting it somewhere that isn’t cash equivalent. Otherwise your money is depreciating in value from inflation. This is your chance to learn from WarmSoda’s mistake and hopefully will keep you from making the same mistake!

                • 🖖USS-Ethernet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  29 months ago

                  Figured. A lot of people just straight believe everything they are told and remain ignorant to how things work. If your job offers any type of benefits, fucking read all of the documentation and if you don’t understand something, ASK QUESTIONS! So many people I work with are oblivious to some benefits available to them and when I try to explain, “hey this one thing is basically free money”, they shrug it off. Whatever, your loss.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You know what you should do? Instead of heeding our warnings you guys should attack us and tell us we’re wrong.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              199 months ago

              Look stranger, no one is saying you’re wrong to call out the problems with the economy. Everyone is on your side there.

              They’re saying that you personally made a mistake, and that’s one that other people can and should avoid for themselves. If after 45 years you REALLY TRULY only have like $2k USD in your retirement account then you messed up somewhere. That’s almost impossible the way compounding interest works.

              Many 401ks are not actually invested by default, it’s up to the account holder to assign those funds themselves. Guessing that’s what happened to you. Unfortunately this isn’t widely known for some reason and companies don’t bother to educate employees about it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Right right, being called a fucking idiot, accused that I’m lying, absolutely goes along with what you’re saying. I too enjoy blaming the victim. Everyone’s on someone’s side alright.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            119 months ago

            how the fuck do you set aside 15% of your paycheck to invest in something you won’t see for another third of a century? you mansa musa or something?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              179 months ago

              I am so confused here–this is what you do to prepare for the future. I guess you could blow it on women or something.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                10
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                no i mean who HAS 15% of their paycheck available to spend. i ain’t bill gates, i have FOOD and RENT

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  59 months ago

                  Most people here decided they’re better than those with less money than them and it’s fine to blame those less fortunate for “thier mistakes”. It’s pretty depressing.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  39 months ago

                  I think you just figured out why we’re doomed. Don’t assume I have spent my life doing this, I’ve tried to stay out of poverty for most of it. Now that I can, I do. Those who have good pay right after college spend their lives paying in.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago
                  1. It doesn’t need to be 15% right away
                  2. Use the power of time

                  The trick is to set aside something, anything, no matter how small, to start. Then whenever you get a raise, set aside part of that so you will never have seen it or spent it.

                  Your most powerful weapon is not how much you can set aside now, but how early you can start. Investments over the length of your career can turn a little into a lot. Get started now, no matter how small, and use time as your greatest weapon.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                109 months ago

                Living expenses > income. It’s not complicated math. You can’t save when you don’t have enough to live and already putting off things like car repairs, health care, hair cuts, buying clothes…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              59 months ago

              I’ve always made decent money, so admittedly it has been easy for me, but my first job, on the advice of our security officer (of all people lol) I immediately put 10% of my income into my 401k. So I went from making no money to 90% of what I had negotiated and learned to live on that. Every raise I got, I increased the amount so my raise was smaller, but my savings larger.

              This is how you make it work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      279 months ago

      Did you fuck up and leave it all in the cash-equivalent fund instead of actually investing it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Nope. Company matching and everything.
        You can doubt all you want, but I’m the one sitting here without anything to show for being in the workforce my whole life.

        You seem to be in complete disbelief that other people have a hard time, questioning anyone that relays 401k does almost nothing for them. It must be nice for you to be in a better position, a huge portion of the population is not though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          399 months ago

          If you put “money in for decades” it would be almost impossible to only have enough for “two months rent” at this point. Either you’re not telling the whole story or you were literally robbed.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            109 months ago

            This still doesn’t explain the “only 2 months rent” part, but I’ve had friends who thought they were investing in a 401k but were seeing virtually no growth. Upon looking into it, they hadn’t allocated funds but were required to do so, so the money was sitting in a cash reserve pile earning the typical .02% interest.

            So, this could mean losing out on 30 years of gains if it were to go on long enough. But 30 years of deposits should still have been way more than 2 months rent so dunno what to say about that part

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          169 months ago

          I put 4%, matched by my employer, for 5 years and have 40k in there. Have you sorted out where the money all went? It’s wild that you can contribute and have nothing.

          Or is your rent like 80k/month? lol

          • PatFusty
            link
            fedilink
            69 months ago

            A lot of people don’t even know they need to invest the 401k funds. So they throw money into a bucket and it only grows as much as they put in.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They can just eat the weeds growing between the cracks of the sidewalk, what’s the problem?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      I’m going to take this opportunity to recommend that no one scrimp and get the budget fiber. It’s not worth it bro.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    249 months ago

    I’m Only 30 but I have no plans for retirement savings. How can I when half my paycheck goes to a roof over my head and a quarter goes to taxes and another quarter goes to food, clothes, and other necessities?

    By the time I’m fifty it will probably be 60% to a roof, 30% to taxes and 10% to food and clothes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      119 months ago

      It’s time for a revolution because it looks like most of the population’s in the same boat. The war between the super rich and everyone else has been fought and we lost. They’re leaving us with two options: revolution or die starving on the streets.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      You may not have much money, but you still have a huge amount of time you can invest. You only need to figure out a few percent of your income, much smaller than taxes, rent, or food, then let time do the work for you. Use the power of compounding returns

    • Bibliotectress
      link
      fedilink
      819 months ago

      I’d kinda favor 401(k)s or something more like that

      I’d rather not have to rely on market gambling to survive in my old age. Many people probably agreed with you until about 2008, when a LOT of retirees lost most of their retirement money during the recession and a lot of really old people went back to work. It was pretty bad, and I’ll never forget it.

      Not that it matters. I can barely afford to live week to week now, let alone save money for retirement. I’ll probably just die, I guess. 🤷‍♀️

    • partial_accumen
      link
      fedilink
      499 months ago

      Social Security has each generation depend on the next generation paying for its retirement.

      This is a true statement but misleading.

      Social Security deductions from worker’s paychecks just go into the general government coffers, not specific savings for Social Security recipients. The government spends this regularly, and separately takes part of the money out of the general coffers and pays today’s Social Security recipients. For decades the government has spent the Social Security surplus on non-Social Security stuff. If it hadn’t, there would be plenty of money in the Social Security “savings account” without having to reduce benefits to future Social Security recipients.

      Al Gore was going to set this up in the year 2000. Instead Florida couldn’t count votes cast properly and we had President George W. Bush.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Instead Florida couldn’t count votes cast properly

        Properly depending on whose side you were on.

        I would say it was properly done for its intended purpose. Unfortunately.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      279 months ago

      SS is insurance you cannot outlive. 401K’s only work for the middle class and up that are able to out save living and medical costs. They are not the same thing and do not work as a replacement.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        Exactly. Problem is no one educates anyone on that and instead just push for you to put more into 401k

  • Valentine Angell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119 months ago

    I’m GenX, been working since I was a teenager. And since I was a teen I always figured I’d have to work until I die. It still seems that way today.

  • [email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    This is exactly why state pensions are the norm in Europe, and I think many other places around the world.

    Here in Portugal, your taxes accumulate pension credit similar to social security in the US, but when you retire you receive around 80% of your highest salary over your career, instead of a few hundred dollars or whatever from American social security.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      I mean, social security will help you get enough medicine as long as only take 1/4 of the prescribed amount and there’s lots of fancy cat food out there…you can eat like a rich person’s pet for only $2-$3 a can!

      On the bright side, between the too-poor-to-retire elderly and kids, we think we can fill all the open jobs created by covid deaths without having to let any immigrants in.

      On an unrelated note, we’re on track to invent the “trillionaire” within the next decade. If that’s not innovation, I don’t know what is.

    • UristMcHolland
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      Pensions in the U.S. were largely replaced with 401k’s. Now we have hedge funds playing the stock market with trillions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I appreciate seeing this information but lines like this will dissuade non believers. “while 1 in people are fighting to survive on less than $15,000 annually.”

      The editor or whomever submitted the article missed it during revisions.

      I assume they meant to say 1 in 10?

      Edit: updated typo lives to lines