• SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Ummm…why would you not consider that a mass shooting? Do you not have neighbors? It kind of seems like that really could be anybody considering many people have at least one unhinged neighbor around them.

        • kase
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          Where does your definition come from? I’m not saying it’s wrong, it’s just not the same as what I and people I know use. For context, I live in the US.

            • kase
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 months ago

              I’m confused. Is your position that yours is the most generally-held definition, or that it should be?

                • kase
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  210 months ago

                  Alright, thanks. What I’m wondering is why you believe this is the average person’s idea of a mass shooting. Is this based on your gut feeling, or is there any kind of evidence you can point me toward? Like I said, it just doesn’t match my personal experience, that’s the only reason I ask.

        • SeaJ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Well that’s nice that you made up your own definition…

          Your distinction can make sense but not how you are looking at it. Saying murder is ancillary is ridiculous. The killers in those cases are not just wildly shooting in the air and it just so happens to hit people and kill them. Killing them is their intent. You could make an argument to split our random mass shootings vs targeted but there is still a pretty obvious base reason for both of those: ease of access to guns.