• SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ummm…why would you not consider that a mass shooting? Do you not have neighbors? It kind of seems like that really could be anybody considering many people have at least one unhinged neighbor around them.

      • kase
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Where does your definition come from? I’m not saying it’s wrong, it’s just not the same as what I and people I know use. For context, I live in the US.

          • kase
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I’m confused. Is your position that yours is the most generally-held definition, or that it should be?

              • kase
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Alright, thanks. What I’m wondering is why you believe this is the average person’s idea of a mass shooting. Is this based on your gut feeling, or is there any kind of evidence you can point me toward? Like I said, it just doesn’t match my personal experience, that’s the only reason I ask.

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well that’s nice that you made up your own definition…

        Your distinction can make sense but not how you are looking at it. Saying murder is ancillary is ridiculous. The killers in those cases are not just wildly shooting in the air and it just so happens to hit people and kill them. Killing them is their intent. You could make an argument to split our random mass shootings vs targeted but there is still a pretty obvious base reason for both of those: ease of access to guns.