Move is to comply with state law passed by Governor Ron DeSantis that prohibits public funding of DEI programs

Archived version: https://archive.ph/2NkY3

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    929 months ago

    “Higher education must return to its essential foundations of academic integrity and the pursuit of knowledge instead of being corrupted by destructive ideologies,” Florida’s commissioner of education, Manny Diaz Jr, said. The actions, he added, would ensure taxpayer money won’t be spent on DEI and “radical indoctrination that promotes division in our society”.

    This is coming from a commissioner of education? Wow I am glad I don’t live in the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      279 months ago

      Appointed position. Which was a change that voters voted for. It’s all stupid all the way down.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Well, it is a rather divisive ideology, simply as a matter of fact.

      Here’s New Jersey, not exactly a Republican stronghold:

      Overall, 42% of employed New Jersey adults considered diversity among their peers “essential,” 29% said it was “important but not essential,” and 28% said “not essential.” While 64% of employed Democrats regarded it as “essential,” only 42% of employed independents and a mere 17% of employed Republicans echoed this sentiment; 52% of Republicans say it is “not important,” compared to 9% of Democrats.

      • @rambaroo
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        71% of all adults say DEI is important but your take is that it’s a divisive topic?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I found another poll specifically about DEI programs:

          A majority of workers (56%) say focusing on increasing diversity, equity and inclusion at work is mainly a good thing; 28% say it is neither good nor bad, and 16% say it is a bad thing. Views on this vary along key demographic and partisan lines.

          And a poll specifically about the Florida ban:

          1. Do you support or oppose laws banning diversity, equity, and inclusion programs from colleges and universities?
          • Support 39%
          • Oppose 50%
          • Neither support nor oppose 7%
          • Unsure 4%

          So you do have a point. Apparently even the average Republican doesn’t have strong negative feelings against DEI programs, with only 30% calling them a bad thing. In Florida, opposition to DEI is stronger than average, but even there more people oppose the ban than support it. I would still say that 30% to 40% opposition makes the issue relatively divisive, especially since the opposition is so concentrated in one political party. However, I admit that it apparently isn’t as divisive as I thought it was before going through these polls more carefully.

          (I’m not sure how to reconcile the results of these polls with the way Republicans actually vote.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I think the devil is in the details. Most people support DEI as a concept; very few people believe diversity, as a concept, is bad. I’m personally supportive of DEI in general, but I have mixed feelings about it in practice.

            My employer has a pretty broad and active program. They hold informational sessions hosted by the different DEI groups throughout the year. Those sessions provide visibility for the groups, but the content is pretty shallow. I assume it feels good to have those sessions for you if you belong to one of the groups though.

            The actual things the DEI program effects are a mixed bag of results. Women and some racial minority groups have increased representation in the company since the groups were created. That’s good. But if you’re a white cishet male, you’ll never encounter any of our recruiters. Recruiting works with the DEI groups to target their special-interest recruiting events. There aren’t any inclusion groups that allow white cishet males, so we end up not going to any events they’re allowed to attend. Of course, anyone can apply through public channels, but direct recruitment gets priority over web applicants. This effectively means we will only consider a white cishet male if there’s nobody else. This structure would be wildly illegal if it were any other group that was excluded in that way, but instead we see that situation lauded as a good thing.

            I don’t have access to any career coaching or employee support groups because those things are all offered through DEI groups, and I’m not welcome to join any of the groups (I’m only allowed to attend virtual webinars as an ally). There are lots of outside of work team building events as well, but I’m not invited to those either.

            I keep hearing that equity isn’t a zero-sum game, but it sure feels like it is from where I’m sitting. I want to speak up and say I should have access to the same resources and benefits as everyone else instead of being excluded based on my race, gender, and orientation. But DEI programs have taught me that whites, males, and cishets take up too much air in the room and I should always yield to literally anyone else in the name of equity.

            TL;DR DEI feels divisive when there is no inclusion group that includes you

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      promotes division

      You just gotta love that “we’re trying to have everyone be treated equally” gets spun as promoting division. It’s the exact fucking oppost

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Just curious which part of this statement makes you happy that you are not in US?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        The part where he calls diversity and inclusion a destructive ideology or radical indoctrination. I wouldn’t want my education officials saying stuff like that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          49 months ago

          radical indoctrination that promotes division

          It’s just bizarre.

          “Inclusivity promotes division!”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          I believe you are in the EU, where Viktor Orban has run Hungary for 13 years. You have no room to talk.

          If the US has to answer for its constituent states, so does the EU.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            The US is a country of its own with internal states, like Germany also has internal states.

            The EU is not a country. You cannot compare the EU and US like this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              You mean that you don’t want to compare them, not that it can’t be done.

              US citizens outside of Florida have no impact on electing Florida’s government officials. Federal law doesn’t affect their elections because they have a state constitution. In many ways the EU is similar to the federal system in the US. Where do you think they got the idea?

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          He did not call it that. Don’t bent his words. And there are problems in American universities from both sides. When researchers in universities are forced to write essays how their physics or chemistry research advances diversity and inclusion, there is something wrong with that too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    689 months ago

    As an autist i am not explicitly targeted by facism but i have always been aware of how these dominoes fall.

    After lgbt and people of color i am next in line.

    Fuck this Nazi scum

  • Nate Cox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    329 months ago

    I am about as far away as one can be from Florida while still residing in the US, and it’s just not far enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      219 months ago

      Washington here. And I’m inclined to agree. Though I used to live in FL, so it’s very conflicting for me. I miss friends and places, but simultaneously want it to be sent out into the ocean and sunk like Atlantis.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    239 months ago

    The crazy thing is how they don’t see how this will only make the view of those educated in Florida as less than that of say NY. Companies like, Google, are pretty selective and if this part of their education is gone this isn’t going to give anyone a leg up in the selection process but rather will explain why graduates from FL have a harder time getting along with, relating to, and working with their team members.

    • @RamblingPanda
      link
      169 months ago

      Not going to lie, if I had an application on my desk that came from a Floridian, I’d check them very closely to see if they’re sane. Besides potentially having a lacking education.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      Christians: “#Hegetsus! Jesus had a diverse group of friends and loved everyone!”

      Also Christians:

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      199 months ago

      Privilege is a thing you know. Being fair doesn’t mean letting the one with the headstart just run and wait for others to catch up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They’re not irrelevant though and thinking they are shows that you don’t understand the issue.

          In the case of gender, DEI programs should actually be helping men at this point because women are attending and graduating college at a much higher rate than men. But the programs haven’t caught up.

          As for race, imagine a foot race where a white runner and a black runner are competing. The white runner starts 50 feet ahead of the black runner because the white runner isn’t dealing with the effects of socal inequities (things such as school funding, quality of teachers, extracurricular activities availability, stable home life, jobs, etc). So a black student of equal talent, but worse grades on paper has had to work much harder than the white student to get ahead. DEI programs are trying to make up for the fact that a black student has had poorer access to proper education.

          Because without DEI, those white kids who statically have access to better schools would always come out ahead when strictly comparing test scores.

          These programs also affect white students in poverty by helping them out too.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              59 months ago

              It’s not about someone coming last making first place. It’s about recognizing that grades and school performance is very much a function of the opportunities you’re afforded, the quality of education that’s available to you, and the support you receive. Hundreds of years of institutional oppression have prevented that kind of quality and support from reaching POC communities.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              Grades aren’t the only thing that determine your potential. Being in a diverse school with others from different backgrounds helps expand your viewpoints and actually prepares you for a larger life after academia.

              One of the many problems with our rural states and towns.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You wouldn’t let me into the olympics on the basis of the fact that I wasn’t a runner for 99% of my life

              Of course not, but we’re more likely to put you on a Wheaties box over someone with similar results because you’ve overcome more adversity. It was more difficult for you. You achieved more.

              We also might be more likely to start up a running program in your town, because clearly we’re missing out on great runners, who were never able to succeed because they were never able to get off the starting block.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  So, that’s the actual problem. If you don’t look at factors like wealth, race, primary language or gender, you can congratulate yourself in your process not being biased, but you will see biased results. Like it or not, people start in different places and face different obstacles, and the goal is to try to adjust for these so the results will be merit based or at least fair, and not racist or sexist.

                  If we’re playing baseball and I start off third base and score, is that the same merit as you getting up to bat, getting on base, working your way around the bases, and also scoring? Any coach would judge you to have shown higher merit despite our scores being the same

          • phillaholic
            link
            fedilink
            59 months ago

            The entire thing is based on their refusal to think anything other than the starting point is equal. When you base your view on that, everything they are crying about makes sense. It explains a lot. They think being gay or Trans is a choice too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          No, you even the field for everyone so that academic progress can happen based on talent and work.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            79 months ago

            Sure, but that isn’t going to happen overnight. School DEI programs are the best we have until schools are funded equally across the board. But that’s never going to happen, especially not if the Republicans get their way with Project 2025 and the school voucher program they want to implement.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Guess we don’t fix racism with more racism. Meritocracy FTW. It is already illegal to discriminate by race, Federally. Smart people can come from any race.

      If I am reading the source right, it is not stopping people from applying for jobs. It is getting rid of DEI departments. Which could or likely have white hires, too.

      In Harvard, they were making up lies about Asian applicants and their characters in order to prop up black student’s lower scores via personality traits, which was well, DEI in action. This part did not make the news much.

      This was found in the court case through discovery, everyone should read it. It was wild, and seemingly the main reason and drive why Affirmative Action was cancelled and overturned.

      Road to hell paved with good intentions and all that jazz.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          79 months ago

          It’s not about preferential treatment. Because if it was preferential treatment, well, white folks have had that for centuries.

          It’s about leveling things up. Yes, smart people come from all backgrounds. But if that smart person has a cognitive burden of worrying about basic stuff that other smart people don’t have too, he/she will be at disadvantage when seeking opportunities to advance.

          I’m not saying I’m an expert, and that you’re totally wrong and I’m totally right. It’s just that the topic is not that simple as black and white (heh.)

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  In which contexts? Because I’m sorry, you seem to be against affirmative action, and affirmative action definitely gives more advantages to minorities in the U.S. than Europe, which has none of that.

                  You’re now contradicting yourself. Is preferential treatment the problem or not? (and it’s spelled preferential with one f.)

                  So clearly you’re talking about something else. Please elaborate, if you’d like.

        • @Spazz
          link
          19 months ago

          Stop lying, you know full well that’s not what’s happening

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          Your theory does not account for systemic racism, history of oppression, and socio-economic disadvantages that minorities face in America.

          If the only race who gets a fair shake in America is white people, albeit rich white people, then those will be the only ones to get into College based on meritocracy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Why would it account for those things?

            Maalus sees uni as a place to learn and expand human knowledge.

            You see it as a tool of social and political change.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        Both, actually. Genes and experiences are both responsible for elements inside human behaviour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      I’m okay with them considering things other than strictly academics. It should be up to the uni to decide what kind of institution they want to be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          If someone wants to doom their university, I wouldn’t support using force to stop them. I don’t think that means I’m okay with it.

          I feel like there’s a limit in there somewhere that I’d change from meh to “fuck those guys” on the racism front. A degree from a uni that doesn’t focus on academics should warrant a reduction in the perceived value of their degrees.

          I kind of think we’ve been distracted here, though. We’re not talking about DEI or the ideologies that drive their activities. We’re talking about AA. You can have AA policies without DEI staff or their question begging theories.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              I was referring to any amount of racism from 0-100. I’d just consider them all pieces of shit at 100 and only a little misled towards the other end.

              I guess I feel like I’m willing to let peeps experiment a bit with their own shit so we can see the outcome. When what you’re doing leads to more kids failing, that’s obviously a bad policy.

              I mostly take issue with the ideology that leads us to use AA that harms pretty much everyone, including the people it’s designed to help.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  19 months ago

                  In state funded schools I agree. Oh. That’s the context of this post and I should have been more clear on that. For private institutions I don’t think it matters much.

    • @Spazz
      link
      19 months ago

      What a giant load of right wing bullshit you’re spewing.

      You know full well what’s wrong with this, stop lying, stop pretending

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      I sometimes look at the states that constituted the CSA and realize I wouldn’t really miss much if were kicked them all out

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        What problem does that solve? You’re effectivelty advocating for them to be free to make their own laws and decisions like is already being done here.

        • JJROKCZ
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          They’re no longer a drain on American resources at that point, all of those states take more resources from the fed than they give

          • FraidyBear
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            There are people in these states who have called it their home for their entire lives, they can’t get out and have no family anywhere else. Sane people who are terrified of what’s happening and are literally begging for help but all anyone sees is this shit so they think we are all the same. I’m literally begging the US or Europe to come and fucking help the southern US, do fucking ANYTHING at this point, please.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    29 months ago

    Might as well have Brendan Small and his cadre of death metal musicians be governor of Florida now.