• SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    That’s not how most people define a “mass shooting”.

    That’s is I and many others define it…

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        No. It just takes some basic intelligence to figure out that mass shootings are shootings of multiple people. Sorry that concept is hard for you to understand.

          • SeaJ
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ummm…why would you not consider that a mass shooting? Do you not have neighbors? It kind of seems like that really could be anybody considering many people have at least one unhinged neighbor around them.

              • kase
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Where does your definition come from? I’m not saying it’s wrong, it’s just not the same as what I and people I know use. For context, I live in the US.

                  • kase
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    I’m confused. Is your position that yours is the most generally-held definition, or that it should be?

              • SeaJ
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well that’s nice that you made up your own definition…

                Your distinction can make sense but not how you are looking at it. Saying murder is ancillary is ridiculous. The killers in those cases are not just wildly shooting in the air and it just so happens to hit people and kill them. Killing them is their intent. You could make an argument to split our random mass shootings vs targeted but there is still a pretty obvious base reason for both of those: ease of access to guns.