• SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      No. It just takes some basic intelligence to figure out that mass shootings are shootings of multiple people. Sorry that concept is hard for you to understand.

        • SeaJ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ummm…why would you not consider that a mass shooting? Do you not have neighbors? It kind of seems like that really could be anybody considering many people have at least one unhinged neighbor around them.

            • kase
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Where does your definition come from? I’m not saying it’s wrong, it’s just not the same as what I and people I know use. For context, I live in the US.

            • SeaJ
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well that’s nice that you made up your own definition…

              Your distinction can make sense but not how you are looking at it. Saying murder is ancillary is ridiculous. The killers in those cases are not just wildly shooting in the air and it just so happens to hit people and kill them. Killing them is their intent. You could make an argument to split our random mass shootings vs targeted but there is still a pretty obvious base reason for both of those: ease of access to guns.